bcquality/microsoft/skills/review/al-testing-review.md

kind	id	version	title	description	inputs	outputs	bc-version	technologies	countries	application-area
action-skill	al-testing-review	1	AL testing review	Performs an AL testing review against guidance from BCQuality.	pr-diff file-path folder-path	findings-report	all	al	w1	all

AL testing review

Reviews AL source changes against the testing knowledge domain in BCQuality and emits a findings report. This is a leaf action skill: it invokes no sub-skills. It is one of the skills composed by al-code-review.

An orchestrator invokes this skill with a pr-diff, file-path, or folder-path. Testing findings are narrow by design — they apply when the review scope contains test codeunits, test runners, test methods, handlers, assertions, or fixture construction. The skill returns not-applicable when none of those apply.

Source

Use READ's Bounded retrieval for review skills workflow with -Domain testing. Consume every catalog page across enabled layers before applying this leaf's Relevance and Worklist; preserve each exact catalog path and open complete bodies only for exact paths selected by the Worklist. If the helper or prepared index is unavailable or invalid, use READ's explicit path-discovery and bounded native-read fallback.

Relevance

Apply the frontmatter matching rules defined in READ (Frontmatter matching semantics) against the task context:

• bc-version — the target BC version from the PR branch's app.json or the orchestrator-supplied version. If unavailable, the dimension is unknown.
• technologies — [al].
• countries — the countries declared in the consuming app's app.json. Default to the orchestrator's configured context; if absent, unknown.
• application-area — the union of application areas declared by the changed objects. Pass the actual set; do not substitute [all]. If the area cannot be determined from the changes, the dimension is unknown.

Discard files that are not applicable. Retain conditionally applicable files (any dimension unknown) only when the orchestrator's configuration permits them; findings derived from those files MUST have confidence no higher than medium, AND the finding's message MUST name the dimension or dimensions that were unknown.

Worklist

Narrow the relevant files to the subset that applies to the changes under review. For each relevant file, compute overlap against:

• The changed AL object names and types — especially codeunits with Subtype = Test, test runner codeunits with TestIsolation, test libraries, and codeunits that define UI handlers.
• The changed methods and attributes, weighted toward [Test], [TransactionModel(...)], [TestPermissions(...)], [HandlerFunctions(...)], handler attributes, asserterror, ExpectedError, ExpectedErrorCode, fixture initialization, and test-library calls.
• Tokens extracted from the diff that relate to testing (Subtype = Test, Subtype = TestRunner, TestIsolation, TestPermissions, Restrictive, NonRestrictive, Disabled, Permissions Mock, Library - Lower Permissions, TransactionModel, AutoRollback, AutoCommit, Commit, asserterror, ExpectedError, ExpectedErrorCode, HandlerFunctions, ConfirmHandler, MessageHandler, StrMenuHandler, ModalPageHandler, SendNotificationHandler, RecallNotificationHandler, Enqueue, Dequeue, AssertEmpty, Initialize, IsInitialized, OnTestInitialize, LibrarySetupStorage, Library Assert, LibraryVariableStorage, LibrarySales, LibraryPurchase, LibraryERM, LibraryInventory, LibraryRandom, Library - Utility, LibraryUtility, GenerateGUID, GenerateRandomCode, TestPage, .Visible(, .Enabled(, .Editable(, OpenNew, OpenView, OpenEdit, Init, Insert).

A file enters the candidate worklist when its keywords intersect the extracted tokens or its topic (derived from the index entry's path, title, and description) matches a changed object type. Read an article's full file — its ## Best Practice / ## Anti Pattern bodies — only after it makes the worklist; candidate selection uses the index alone. When the diff contains no testing-related changes by any of the above signals, return outcome: "not-applicable" without evaluating files.

The following targeted checks cover every current testing article. Treat each as a candidate-selection cue: when the signal appears in changed code, add the named article to the worklist and evaluate it in Action.

• A method in a Subtype = Test codeunit adds or changes [TransactionModel(...)], exercises code that calls Commit under AutoRollback, defaults broadly to AutoCommit, or chooses None for a writing test — transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.
• A new or changed [Test] procedure is added, whether or not it already carries [FEATURE]/[SCENARIO]/[GIVEN]/[WHEN]/[THEN] tags — test-feature-scenario-tags. A procedure with no tags at all, or a generic name like Test1, is the anti-pattern signal; presence of the tags is the compliant shape, not the thing to search for.
• A test codeunit calls TestPage methods (OpenNew, OpenView, OpenEdit) alongside [Test] procedures in the same codeunit that call business-logic procedures directly with no TestPage involved — ui-test-codeunit-naming. The anti-pattern signal is both kinds of test mixed into one codeunit (or, on a project using the _UT convention, a UI-layer codeunit missing the suffix); a codeunit containing only TestPage-driven tests is not itself a violation.
• A [GIVEN]-tagged setup precedes a posting call or report execution and does not visibly set up posting-group/VAT setup records, an explicit date, or (for a report test) both an included and an excluded record — given-blocks-must-cover-full-precondition-chain.
• A test procedure contains more than one [WHEN] block, or more than one distinct action not labelled [GIVEN], without the procedure name declaring a flow/defect-then-fix shape — test-one-when-per-test.
• A BCPT* scenario codeunit is added and the PerformanceTest app's only other scenario codeunits are copies of Microsoft's shipped BCPT samples (BCPT Create Customer, BCPT Create Item Journal, BCPT Post GL Entries, etc.) with no scenario exercising the extension's own codeunits, FlowFields, or pages — bcpt-scenarios-must-be-app-specific.
• An AutoCommit test runs under a Subtype = TestRunner codeunit that omits TestIsolation or sets it to Disabled, leaving committed data between tests — testisolation-belongs-on-the-test-runner. Require runner/repository context; a standalone test file cannot prove which runner executes it.
• A permission-sensitive test uses TestPermissions = Disabled, claims to test a restricted user without "Permissions Mock"/"Library - Lower Permissions", or declares [TestPermissions(...)] without applying that context — permission-tests-must-lower-the-execution-context.
• Test fixture code manually calls Init/Insert, invents keys or prerequisite records, or bypasses available LibrarySales, LibraryPurchase, LibraryERM, LibraryInventory, LibraryRandom, or equivalent library codeunits — use-library-codeunits-for-test-fixtures.
• A test codeunit's Initialize procedure exits on IsInitialized before per-test reset such as LibraryVariableStorage.Clear, LibrarySetupStorage.Restore, or LibraryTestInitialize.OnTestInitialize, or a [Test] method in a codeunit using that pattern does not call Initialize() first — reset-per-test-state-before-the-isinitialized-guard.
• asserterror is added or changed without a following Assert.ExpectedError, Assert.ExpectedErrorCode, or a purpose-built assertion such as ExpectedTestFieldError — asserterror-needs-expectederror-and-code.
• Test fixture code assigns a hardcoded literal to a primary-key field or a field the test relies on as a unique lookup identifier, hand-builds a "unique" value for such a field (string concatenation, a counter, Format(CurrentDateTime)), or truncates LibraryUtility.GenerateGUID()'s result with CopyStr for such a field shorter than 10 characters — use-generateguid-for-unique-test-fixture-values. Calling GenerateGUID() untruncated into a full-length field, GenerateRandomCodeWithLength for a shorter field needing real verified uniqueness, or GenerateRandomCode20 specifically for a Code[20] field, is the compliant shape, not the signal to flag. GenerateRandomCode20 is not a substitute for GenerateRandomCodeWithLength on a shorter field — it truncates GenerateGUID()'s sequential value down to the field's length by keeping the leftmost characters, which change the slowest, so retries against a short field can churn through the same truncated prefix far longer than GenerateRandomCodeWithLength's equivalent. A hardcoded or deterministic value in an ordinary descriptive field is not this anti-pattern — that field carries no uniqueness constraint. Do not claim GenerateRandomCode (without WithLength/20) or GenerateRandomXMLText verify uniqueness against the real table, or that GenerateRandomCode is collision-free even within one test run for a short field — none of that is true.
• A test asserts against a TestPage field's .Visible() or .Enabled() — use-testpage-visible-enabled-to-verify-field-ui-state. When the assertion is against .Editable(), or the page is opened with OpenEdit() specifically to check editability — use-testpage-editable-to-verify-field-editability.
• A test path raises UI and [HandlerFunctions(...)] does not match the invoked handlers, or the test has no meaningful evidence of the UI result (for example, it treats a Boolean set before the action as proof of success) — ui-handlers-in-tests. A capture/reset/assert-after-RunModal pattern is valid. Enqueue/dequeue and AssertEmpty are required only when order, count, text, replies, or a scripted sequence is part of the contract. Only nonoptional handlers have to execute: a listed handler declared [SendNotificationHandler(true)] or [RecallNotificationHandler(true)] is optional by design, so do not treat it as unmatched when the run never raises the notification.
• A test's [GIVEN]/setup looks up a hardcoded code/number/name assumed to already exist instead of creating it, leaves a mandatory field on a created record empty, uses a value that doesn't satisfy the scenario's own explicit length/format requirement (for example a truncation test whose value never exceeds the field), or a scenario-defining value (amount, quantity, percentage, date, threshold, rounding precision) is generated/randomized instead of an explicit chosen value — test-data-must-be-random-and-complete. Generating incidental fixture values (identifiers, names, descriptions) via the standard library codeunits is the compliant shape, not the signal to flag, and neither is a short-but-valid value in an otherwise-unremarkable field.

Once the candidate worklist is known, resolve layer-precedence conflicts per READ. Drop lower-precedence files whose normative guidance (## Best Practice or ## Anti Pattern) directly contradicts a higher-precedence candidate, and record each dropped file in suppressed with reason: "layer-precedence". Files that would have been candidates but are hidden because their layer is disabled in consumer configuration are recorded with reason: "configuration". Files that never became candidates are NOT recorded in suppressed.

When the post-conflict worklist is empty because no applicable testing knowledge exists, or because configuration suppressed every candidate, emit outcome: "no-knowledge". When the worklist is empty because no applicable testing knowledge matched the changes, emit outcome: "completed" with an empty findings array.

Action

For each worklist entry, evaluate the diff against the file's ## Best Practice and ## Anti Pattern sections. Emit findings as follows:

• When the diff contains a clear match for an Anti Pattern, emit a finding with severity major or blocker, a message summarizing the anti-pattern, location pointing to the offending line or range, and a references entry pointing to the knowledge file. Use blocker only when the test can pass while verifying the wrong behavior or can leave committed data that contaminates later tests; otherwise the ceiling is major.
• When the diff contains code that contradicts a Best Practice without being a full anti-pattern, emit minor with the same reference shape.
• Applicability alone is not a finding. Emit info only for a concrete, non-actionable observation the article explicitly defines; otherwise emit nothing when no violation is present.

For ui-handlers-in-tests, use major when missing or incorrectly listed handlers make the test fail at runtime. Use minor when the test executes but lacks a meaningful semantic postcondition, including a pre-set Boolean used as proof. Do not escalate solely because a handler does not use queue storage or asserts inside the handler.

Set confidence to:

• high when the detection is based on an unambiguous pattern match (attribute, handler declaration, assertion sequence, or fixture call).
• medium when detection relies on heuristics or when any frontmatter dimension was unknown.
• low when the finding is an advisory derived only from applicability.

After evaluating each worklist entry, also consider whether the diff exhibits a testing defect the agent recognises from its general AL knowledge that no knowledge file in the worklist covers. Such candidates are agent findings within this skill's domain — emit them with references: [], an id slug prefixed with agent:, confidence capped at medium, severity capped at minor (agent findings are advisory and non-gating), and a message that is self-contained (describing both the issue and a concrete recommendation, since there is no knowledge-file footer for the consumer to fall back on). Hold every candidate to the precision bar in skills/do.md (Agent findings): emit only a concrete, material testing defect a knowledgeable BC reviewer would agree is wrong — steelman it first and drop anything stylistic, speculative, dependent on code outside the diff, or merely a valid alternative; when in doubt, omit. The scope is strictly AL testing; defects outside this domain belong to other leaves and MUST NOT be emitted here. Before emitting, check the worklist for a knowledge file that matches the candidate — if one exists, upgrade the candidate to a knowledge-backed finding instead. See skills/do.md for the full contract.

For every emitted finding, decide whether the fix is mechanical. A fix is mechanical when it is small, local, and unambiguous from the diff context (for example: add the matching ExpectedError assertion after asserterror; add or remove a handler name in HandlerFunctions, except that a listed optional notification handler must never be proposed for removal; add LibraryVariableStorage.Clear or AssertEmpty when queue/LVS intentionally verifies interaction order, count, text, replies, or a scripted sequence; or replace hand-rolled fixture creation with an evident library call). For mechanical findings, emit findings[].suggested-code with the literal replacement for the source lines indicated by location. The payload must be a verbatim replacement — no diff markers, no fences, no commentary — that the consumer can render as a one-click suggestion. When a .good.al companion exists and the diff context matches the .bad.al shape, adapt the .good.al replacement into suggested-code.

Omit suggested-code only when the appropriate fix depends on context the skill cannot determine, when multiple defensible replacements exist, or when the fix spans non-contiguous code. If a finding is mechanical-looking but you omit suggested-code, set findings[].suggested-code-omission-reason to a short explanation. See skills/do.md for the full contract.

Outcome selection:

• completed — the skill evaluated every worklist item.
• no-knowledge — no applicable testing knowledge survived filtering.
• not-applicable — the diff touches no test codeunit, runner, method, handler, assertion, or fixture surface.
• partial — a budget was hit before the worklist was exhausted.
• failed — an unrecoverable error occurred.

Output

Output conforms to the DO output contract. Every finding this skill emits MUST set findings[].domain to "Testing". A populated example:

{
  "skill": { "id": "al-testing-review", "version": 1 },
  "outcome": "completed",
  "summary": {
    "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 1, "minor": 0, "info": 0 },
    "coverage": { "worklist-size": 1, "items-evaluated": 1 }
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "microsoft/knowledge/testing/asserterror-needs-expectederror-and-code.md",
      "severity": "major",
      "message": "The negative test uses asserterror without checking the resulting message or error code, so any unrelated setup or permission error can make the test pass.",
      "location": {
        "file": "test/SalesPostingTests.Codeunit.al",
        "line": 42
      },
      "references": [
        { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/testing/asserterror-needs-expectederror-and-code.md" }
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "domain": "Testing",
      "suggested-code": "asserterror PostInvalidOrder();\nAssert.ExpectedError(ExpectedPostingErr);"
    }
  ],
  "suppressed": []
}

The empty-corpus case produces:

{
  "skill": { "id": "al-testing-review", "version": 1 },
  "outcome": "no-knowledge",
  "summary": {
    "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 0, "info": 0 },
    "coverage": { "worklist-size": 0, "items-evaluated": 0 }
  },
  "findings": [],
  "suppressed": []
}