mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-07 18:06:53 +01:00
Adds 55 articles (plus 76 code samples) spanning four new domains and two existing domains, extracted from the internal Business Central review-agent prompt. Content was filtered against BCQuality's remedial-knowledge premise: each article encodes BC-specific behaviour, a CodeCop rule, a platform API semantic, or an anti-false-positive guideline that a capable LLM would otherwise get wrong. New domains: - privacy (11 articles): DataClassification inheritance semantics, the StrSubstNo-defeats-Error-telemetry-classification pitfall, Privacy Notice consent for outgoing requests, anti-false-positives for pages and in-memory data. - upgrade (11 articles): upgrade-codeunit structure, upgrade-tag lifecycle and registration, protected DB reads, DataTransfer for large datasets, InitValue semantics, enum-ordinal preservation, obsolete-workflow, first-install detection. - ui (9 articles): caption capitalization by phrase type, tooltip voice, teaching-tip vs tooltip, tour-tip conventions, character limits, banned terms, ampersand handling, title punctuation. - style (11 articles): label-suffix convention, API page naming, temporary-variable prefix, label properties (Comment/Locked), named invocations, FieldCaption in user messages, OptionCaption pairing, Error-parameter passing, `this` keyword, required parentheses, file naming. Gaps in existing domains: - performance (11 articles): production-scale table catalog (no row counts, per internal-data concern), anti-false-positive for bounded tables, guard-before-Get ordering, redundant-Get-in-OnAfterGetRecord, LockTable in read-only helpers, combined ModifyAll passes, writes in OnAfterGetRecord, SetLoadFields heuristics, temporary-table regressions, FlowField source-table widening, MaintainSQLIndex disabling SIFT. - security (2 articles): environment-specific hardcoded GUIDs, ValidateTableRelation=false on user input. Intentionally excluded: specific production P95 row-count numbers (aggregated internal telemetry); rewritten as categorical guidance on which tables to treat as production-scale without publishing sizes. All articles use `bc-version: [all]` (applies to every BC version, per the new schema sentinel). Validator passes with 0 errors / 0 warnings.
22 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
22 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
bc-version: [all]
|
|
domain: performance
|
|
keywords: [ledger-entry, production-scale, hot-table, item-ledger, gl-entry, sales-invoice-line]
|
|
technologies: [al]
|
|
countries: [w1]
|
|
application-area: [all]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Treat ledger-entry and line-type tables as production-scale when reviewing performance
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
A handful of Business Central tables grow to millions of rows in production tenants: Item Ledger Entry, Value Entry, G/L Entry, VAT Entry, Customer Ledger Entry, Vendor Ledger Entry, Sales Invoice Line, Purchase Invoice Line, Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry, Detailed Vendor Ledg. Entry, and equivalent line-type tables. Master-data tables like Customer, Vendor, and Item typically reach the high hundreds of thousands. A performance review that treats these tables with the same latitude as setup tables or small reference lists under-reports real regressions; the same filter-or-key mistake that is invisible on a 50-row table is a full table scan over millions of rows on these.
|
|
|
|
## Best Practice
|
|
|
|
When a code change touches any of the above tables, demand concrete performance reasoning before accepting it: an appropriate key selection, a SetLoadFields narrowing, filters that use the key prefix, no N+1 inside the iteration. A finding on one of these tables should almost never be downgraded from High to Low on the grounds that "the operation looks small" — at production scale the operation is never small.
|
|
|
|
## Anti Pattern
|
|
|
|
Applying review heuristics uniformly to all tables. A missing SetCurrentKey on a Setup table changes nothing; the same mistake on Item Ledger Entry turns a list page into a multi-second load. The asymmetry is the whole point of the catalog — knowing which tables warrant the stricter read.
|