f19f0618fb
* Add events knowledge domain and review leaf skill Add a new `events` knowledge domain covering AL events & subscribers, wired into the AL review pipeline. - 3 atomic articles (+ .good.al/.bad.al samples) under microsoft/knowledge/events/: the IsHandled override pattern, thin OnBefore/OnAfter integration-event publishers, and static vs manual subscribers. - New leaf skill microsoft/skills/review/al-events-review.md sourcing the events domain. - Wired into microsoft/skills/review/al-code-review.md (sub-skills + Source + description) and README.md (leaf-skill count + domain list). AL event syntax verified against Microsoft Learn. Samples are demonstration-only (not compiled by CI). Additive change; no contract change. Part of #34. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Add 12 general AL event-design articles to events domain Add 12 atomic knowledge articles under microsoft/knowledge/events covering general AL event-design best practices: IsHandled initialization and OnAfter preservation, appending new event parameters, position-based event naming, reusing/extending events, avoiding per-iteration publishing, Temp-prefixing temporary record parameters, unabbreviated parameter names, preferring the this keyword over IncludeSender, avoiding loosely typed parameters, not mutating existing event contracts, and not bypassing critical operations with IsHandled. Each article ships a .good.al and .bad.al demonstration sample (object IDs 50240-50296; not compiled by CI). Extend the al-events-review leaf Worklist with one targeted check per new rule. Additive only; no contract or wiring change (events leaf already wired). Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Refine events articles after review feedback Correct wording in five events articles to reflect that AL event subscribers bind by parameter name, not position: - add-new-event-parameters-at-the-end: drop the inaccurate claim that appending a parameter forces subscribers to be updated or causes wrong values; keep the append-at-end best practice. - do-not-add-ishandled-to-an-existing-event: reframe from "breaking change" to the semantic/purpose shift that leaves existing subscribers pointless; rename the breaking-change keyword to semantic-change. - name-events-by-publisher-position: extend the good sample with position-named publishers raised from table and report trigger contexts. - initialize-ishandled-to-false-before-publishing: scope the detection and best practice to events that actually carry a var IsHandled, so an OnBefore with no IsHandled is not flagged. - do-not-bypass-critical-operations-with-ishandled: add a litmus-test definition of a critical operation (code that cannot stand as an independent, self-contained unit). Knowledge-only; no contract or wiring change. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Soften Anti Pattern wording in add-new-event-parameters article Remove the last name-vs-position misconception from the Anti Pattern so it is consistent with the corrected Description: mid-list insertion is framed as noisy and harder to review rather than as forcing subscriber re-mapping. Detection sentence unchanged. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Add events domain reviewers to CODEOWNERS Add @AleksandricMarko and @pchriste-microsoft-com as required reviewers for the events knowledge domain, matching the existing per-domain expert ownership convention. Inserted in alphabetical order ahead of the performance line. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2.2 KiB
| bc-version | domain | keywords | technologies | countries | application-area | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
events |
|
|
|
|
Publish thin OnBefore/OnAfter integration events to expose extension points
Description
A key operation — a posting, release, or validation routine — becomes a hard wall for partners when it ships no integration events: the only way to change it is to overwrite or duplicate the base code. The Business Central remedy is to raise thin OnBeforeX/OnAfterX integration events at the operation's boundaries, passing var Rec and the relevant parameters so subscribers have what they need. An equally common defect is the inverse: putting business logic inside the publisher method body. An event publisher is a hook, not a procedure — its body must be empty, and the platform even forbids variables, return values, and code other than comments in it. LLMs both omit the extension points and, when they do add an event, wrongly fill its body with logic.
Best Practice
Wrap the operation's core with events: raise OnBeforeX(var Rec, var IsHandled) before the default work and OnAfterX(var Rec) once it succeeds, at the natural boundaries of the routine. Declare each publisher [IntegrationEvent(false, false)] local procedure with an empty body and let the calling routine — never the publisher — own the logic. Pass records by var so subscribers can read and adjust them, and include the parameters a subscriber would need to act. This gives partners a stable seam without touching base code.
See sample: publish-thin-onbefore-onafter-integration-events.good.al.
Anti Pattern
Business logic placed inside an [IntegrationEvent] publisher method, so the "event" actually mutates state every time it is raised — defeating the hook and surprising every reader — or a core operation that exposes no extension points at all, forcing partners to overwrite or duplicate it. Detection: an [IntegrationEvent]/[BusinessEvent] method whose body contains statements rather than being empty, or a posting/validation routine with no surrounding OnBefore/OnAfter publishers.
See sample: publish-thin-onbefore-onafter-integration-events.bad.al.