cc7c1f2ee0
- Rename 3 articles so their .good.al/.bad.al companion stems match (do-not-change-primary-key, testfield-required-setup-field, al-identifiers-english), fixing the R14 orphan-sample errors. - do-not-change-primary-key.good.al: include Flow in the new table's own primary key so it actually models the discriminating dimension. - al-build-output-must-not-pollute-project-root.md: drop the unsubstantiated AL0197 causal claim and the non-existent al.outputPath setting; reframe as build-artifact hygiene sourced from ALTool --outfolder / al_build outputPath. - prefer-email-module.md: Email Message is Codeunit 8904, not a table; distinguish it from the underlying Sent/Outbox/Draft storage. - file-datatype-saas.md: File.Open/Create/Read/Write fails to compile against a Cloud-scoped project, it does not compile and silently fail at runtime. - namespace-must-be-verified-from-source.md: narrow to "resolve from the referenced object's source or symbols," since source-file line one is not the only authoritative source (symbol packages, comments before the namespace line). - test-data-must-be-random-and-complete.md: drop "assume an empty database" and "collision-free" absolutes; reframe around independence from unrelated business records and reserving explicit values for scenario-defining inputs. - binary-choice-must-be-boolean.md: scope to genuine true/false semantics, not mechanical two-member-enum-to-boolean conversion. - document-report-word-layout.md: scope down to a sourced Microsoft Learn recommendation instead of an unconditional performance guarantee; cite the three Learn pages. - Wire the new articles into their review skills' candidate-selection signals (file-datatype-saas, prefer-email-module, namespace-must-be-verified-from-source, var-parameters-require-an- addressable-variable) so they can actually enter a worklist. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
| bc-version | domain | keywords | technologies | countries | application-area | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
style |
|
|
|
|
Binary yes/no choices must be typed as Boolean, not Option or Integer
Contributions welcome — open a PR to refine or extend this article.
Description
When a field or variable represents a genuine true/false state — yes/no, on/off, active/inactive, blocked/not blocked — it should be typed Boolean. Modeling that same predicate as an Option/Enum with two members, or as an Integer with two magic-number values, adds a layer of indirection a reader has to resolve before understanding the code. This is about semantics, not member count: a domain concept that currently has exactly two named alternatives — Inbound/Outbound, Debit/Credit, Buy/Sell — is not automatically a Boolean in disguise. An Enum can be the clearer model there, including when it needs to implement an interface, preserve an existing contract, or leave room for a future third value. The distinction is whether the domain is genuinely a stable predicate, not how many states it currently has.
Best Practice
Type a field or variable as Boolean when the domain concept is inherently a true/false state. Do not replace a meaningful two-option domain model with a Boolean solely because it currently has two values.
See sample: binary-choice-must-be-boolean.good.al.
Anti Pattern
Modeling a yes/no choice as an Option with two members, or as an Integer with magic-number values, forces every caller to remember which value means what and leaves room for a meaningless third value.
See sample: binary-choice-must-be-boolean.bad.al.