bcquality/microsoft/knowledge/performance/use-isempty-for-existence-checks.md
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 9a4198eb28 Add [all] sentinel to bc-version; apply to version-agnostic knowledge
Most of the corpus — FindSet/SetLoadFields/CalcFields patterns, permission
sets, SingleInstance codeunits, DataClassification, IsolatedStorage,
transaction scope, SecretText — describes BC platform behaviour that is
identical across supported versions. The seed [26..28] range on every
file implied a version-specificity the content does not actually have,
and there was no way to express "applies to every version" in the
schema the way [w1] and [all] already do for countries and
application-area.

Extend the v1 schema with a universal sentinel for bc-version, parallel
to the sentinels already defined for the other dimensions:

  bc-version: [all]         # applies to every BC version

[all] is mutually exclusive with explicit versions. Range shorthand
([26..28]) and explicit lists ([26, 27, 28]) continue to work for files
genuinely tied to a version-gated API or deprecation.

Update read.md (field definition, matching semantics, partial-context
rule), write.md (default to [all], use ranges only with a concrete
reason), README.md (frontmatter example), and the CI validator. All
forty existing knowledge files and the three action skills convert to
[all]; none of the current content is version-gated. Validator passes.
2026-04-23 16:00:03 +02:00

29 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown

---
bc-version: [all]
domain: performance
keywords: [isempty, count, findfirst, existence]
technologies: [al]
countries: [w1]
application-area: [all]
---
# Use IsEmpty for existence checks
> **Seed article.** Converted from an existing performance-review prompt to bootstrap the BCQuality performance corpus. Domain stewards should expand, restructure, and refine as needed.
## Description
IsEmpty is the cheapest way to answer whether at least one row matches the current filters. It short-circuits at the first match and never hydrates a record. Count() scans and counts the entire set; FindFirst fetches a full row just to be discarded.
## Best Practice
Use `if not Rec.IsEmpty() then ...` for existence checks. Reserve Count for cases where the exact number of rows is needed, and FindFirst for cases where you actually want the row's field values.
See sample: `use-isempty-for-existence-checks.good.al`.
## Anti Pattern
`if Rec.Count() > 0` iterates the whole set just to answer a yes/no question. `if Rec.FindFirst() then` loads an entire row of data the caller never reads.
See sample: `use-isempty-for-existence-checks.bad.al`.