6b33e10146
Michaels observation: udviklere tilfoejer agenter lokalt i enkelt-repos (Edison opstod saadan) - og repoer maa ikke opfoere sig forskelligt. Francis (Bacon) observerer og Immanuel (Kant) universaliserer, men ingen haandhaevede ensartethed paa tvaers af portefoeljen. Tre byggesten: - Ny regel repo-local-agents-must-be-universalized-or-removed: lokale agenter/kvalitetsregler har to fremtider - universaliseres via Francis/Immanuel/Michael eller fjernes. Aldrig tavs beholdelse. Domaeneviden hoerer i projectmemory/docs; kvalitetsstandarder i BCQuality eller ingen steder. - Mode B v11: reconciliation kigger nu BEGGE veje - ekstra filer i .github/.agents (ikke i template-tabellen) flages med a/b-valg: universaliser eller fjern. Det var fogeden, der manglede: Edison laa uopdaget lokalt, fordi Mode B kun tjekkede manglende filer. - court.agent.md v2: to sagstyper. Effektivitets-sager kraever Edison- scorecards som hidtil; RegelSanity-sager (lokal divergens) kraever kun filen, gabet den udfylder, og spoergsmaalet universel-eller-ud. Disposition: UNIVERSALIZE eller REMOVE. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.1 KiB
| bc-version | domain | keywords | technologies | countries | application-area | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
architecture |
|
|
|
|
Repo-local agents and rules must be universalized or removed
Description
CURABIS repos must behave identically. A developer who adds an agent or a
quality rule directly to one repo's .github/.agents/ (instead of proposing
it for BCQuality) creates silent divergence: that repo reviews, routes, or
behaves differently from every other repo, and the improvement — if it is one
— never reaches the rest of the portfolio.
This happened in practice: edison.agent.md was created locally in one repo.
It was invisible to all other repos for weeks, while court.agent.md
(deployed everywhere) declared a hard dependency on Edison's scorecards — a
dependency no other repo could satisfy. The agent was good; the placement
made it a liability.
Repo-specific agents and quality rules do not produce better quality. They
produce N repos with N behaviours. Domain-specific knowledge (business rules,
scope, customer context) belongs in projectmemory/ and docs/specs/ —
process and quality standards belong in BCQuality, or nowhere.
Rule
Any agent file or quality/process rule found in a repo that is not part of the BCQuality-deployed set has exactly two futures, and silence is not one of them:
- Universalize — route it through the governance pipeline: Francis files the observation, Immanuel universalizes, Michael merges to BCQuality, the next stable promote deploys it to every repo. If the addition raises a portfolio-level question (overlap with existing agents, structural change), the Court hears it as a RegelSanity case — no Edison scorecards required for divergence cases; the file itself and the question "universal or out?" suffice.
- Remove — if it does not generalize, it does not belong in the repo.
Detection is Mode B's job: reconciliation must flag files present in
.github/.agents/ that are NOT in the setup template list — extras, not just
missing files.
What NOT to do
- Do not keep a locally added agent because it is useful — usefulness is the argument FOR universalizing it, not for keeping it private
- Do not delete a local agent without the routing step; it may be the best idea in the portfolio (Edison was)
- Do not put quality or process rules in a project's CLAUDE.md or projectmemory/ to avoid the governance pipeline
- Do not treat this as bureaucracy — one promote deploys to every repo; universalizing is cheaper than maintaining a private fork of the standard
Signal to watch for
During Mode B or at session start: a file in .github/.agents/ whose name
does not appear in the setup template table in curabis-standard.agent.md.
Message to developer
When a repo-local agent or rule is found, tell the developer: this repo carries a local agent/rule that no other CURABIS repo has; per RegelSanity it must either be proposed for BCQuality (offer to route it to Francis and Immanuel now) or removed — and ask which of the two they want.