mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
4119417ce4
* Add 15 community knowledge articles from BC Code Intel ingest Ingests net-new /community knowledge from BC Code Intelligence, surviving the admission test, gray-zone salvage, and dedup against the full corpus. Domains: ui (6), error-handling (3), performance (2), upgrade (1), appsource (1), security (1), telemetry (1). The two BC24 No. Series migration drafts are merged into one article. Adds good/bad AL samples for the clean-fit articles (error-handling, performance, security, telemetry). UI and appsource remain knowledge-only. Validator and knowledge-index checks pass (207 articles). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Correct SetLoadFields JIT-load article to match MS docs The draft claimed accessing an unlisted field "reloads the entire row" per record. Microsoft's partial-records docs say otherwise: the platform does an implicit Get that loads the missing field(s), and in a direct var loop the first JIT updates the enumerator so later iterations do not re-load. The genuine per-row penalty is the pass-by-value case, where the copy's enumerator is not updated. Rewrite the article around JIT loading and the by-value footgun, rename the slug from ...full-reload to ...jit-load, and fix the good/bad samples to demonstrate the by-value repetition accurately. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jeremy Vyska <jeremy@sparebrained.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
24 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
24 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
bc-version: [all]
|
|
domain: performance
|
|
keywords: [deleteall, ondelete, run-trigger, set-based-delete, bulk-delete, triggers, validation]
|
|
technologies: [al]
|
|
countries: [w1]
|
|
application-area: [all]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# DeleteAll skips OnDelete unless you pass RunTrigger
|
|
|
|
> Contributions welcome — open a PR to refine or extend this article.
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
`Record.DeleteAll()` — equivalently `DeleteAll(false)` — translates to a single set-based SQL `DELETE` and **does not** run AL `OnDelete` triggers or field/table validations. Only database-level referential constraints still apply. To run `OnDelete` logic you must call `DeleteAll(true)`, which then deletes record-by-record and forfeits the set-based performance, making it equivalent to a `FindSet` loop calling `Delete(true)`. The common misconception, which training data reproduces, is that `DeleteAll` iterates and fires `OnDelete` per record; it does not. (Parameterless `Delete()` likewise defaults to `Delete(false)` and skips `OnDelete`.)
|
|
|
|
## Best Practice
|
|
|
|
Use `DeleteAll()` / `DeleteAll(false)` for bulk deletion only when no AL `OnDelete` cleanup is required — it is the fast, set-based form. When `OnDelete` logic must run (cascading deletes, ledger cleanup, integration events), pass `DeleteAll(true)` and accept the row-by-row cost, or refactor the cleanup to run explicitly before the bulk delete.
|
|
|
|
## Anti Pattern
|
|
|
|
Calling `DeleteAll()` and assuming dependent records, integration events, or validation side effects are handled by `OnDelete`. The deletion succeeds but the AL-side cleanup never runs, leaving orphaned data — and adding a manual `FindSet`/`Delete` loop "for safety" reintroduces the per-record cost the set-based form was chosen to avoid.
|