bcquality/microsoft/knowledge/performance/temporary-tables-have-no-database-cost.md
Jesper Schulz-Wedde af94c135ad Add BC performance knowledge from OptimAL learnings
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-25 14:13:37 +02:00

26 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

---
bc-version: [all]
domain: performance
keywords: [temporary-table, in-memory, findset, findfirst, get, no-db-cost]
technologies: [al]
countries: [w1]
application-area: [all]
---
# Temporary tables avoid SQL I/O, not in-memory work
## Description
A temporary table stores its rows in Business Central Server memory instead of a physical SQL table. Its reads and writes therefore do not incur SQL round-trips, locking, or SIFT maintenance. They still allocate memory and execute record filtering, key lookup, sorting, insertion, and iteration in the service tier; those costs grow with the temporary dataset and access pattern.
## Best Practice
Do not apply SQL-specific findings such as missing `SetLoadFields`, lock contention, or N+1 database round-trips to a temporary record. Still assess memory volume and repeated scans or lookups. In a matrix, if each cell re-sums the same group, calculate the totals once at the complete group key and reuse them; invalidate or adjust totals if cells change. For a pure key-to-value collection, consider an AL `Dictionary`; keep a temporary table when record fields, keys, filtering, or ordered iteration are required. Measure AL time and peak memory, not just SQL time.
See sample: [`temporary-tables-have-no-database-cost.good.al`](temporary-tables-have-no-database-cost.good.al).
## Anti Pattern
Claiming that every temporary-table access pattern is free because no SQL is involved. A nested scan over a large in-memory buffer can still dominate service-tier CPU, while adding `SetLoadFields` to that buffer addresses a database cost that does not exist.
See sample: [`temporary-tables-have-no-database-cost.bad.al`](temporary-tables-have-no-database-cost.bad.al).