bcquality/microsoft/knowledge/data-modeling/activate-new-price-calculation-handler-via-onfindsupportedsetup.md
Michael Dieringer eb9cae0af4 Fix 5 merge-critical issues from Jesper's 2026-09-24 review round
- activate-new-price-calculation-handler-via-onfindsupportedsetup: Default
  := true is required only for the fallback branch of PriceCalculationMgt's
  two-stage FindSetup - a handler reachable via a specific Dtld. Price
  Calculation Setup row needs no Default. Softened the article and its
  worklist cue accordingly. Also fixed an undefined "Sample Price Calc -
  Special" codeunit referenced but never declared in the eval fixtures -
  added a real implementation of interface "Price Calculation" with stub
  methods.
- new-price-source-must-add-candidate-and-trigger-recalculation: the good
  fixture called UpdateUnitPriceByField directly, which is a silent no-op
  without a prior PlanPriceCalcByField call (FieldCausedPriceCalculation
  gating, verified against SalesLine.Table.al). Switched to the public
  UpdateUnitPrice wrapper, matching real BCApps usage in
  ItemReferenceManagement.Codeunit.al.
- report-barcodes-must-use-barcode-module-and-production-font-name: split
  the 1D (ValidateInput + EncodeFont) and 2D (EncodeFont only) Barcode Font
  Provider interfaces, which the article previously conflated. Reframed the
  Code 39 anti-pattern around demonstrable encoding/checksum mismatch
  (verified against IDA1DCode39Encoder.Codeunit.al's real '(value)' output)
  rather than rejecting all manual delimiter use, since '*' is a legitimate
  Code 39 start/stop character. Also fixed extend-find-entries-navigate-
  for-new-document-types' eval fixtures, which referenced an undefined
  "Sample Posted Document Header" table/page - declared both.

All claims re-verified against live microsoft/BCApps source. Validators:
frontmatter 0/0, review-fixtures 126/20 domains PASSED, knowledge-index
342/575 PASSED, skill-index 19 leaves PASSED.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-24 21:10:19 +02:00

5.4 KiB

bc-version domain keywords technologies countries application-area
all
data-modeling
price-calculation
price-calculation-handler
price-calculation-setup
integration-event
pricing
al
w1
all

Activate a new Price Calculation Handler through OnFindSupportedSetup, not just by implementing it

Description

enum 7011 "Price Calculation Handler" (implements "Price Calculation") is how a new pricing engine plugs into Business Central — extend the enum with a value pointing at a codeunit that implements the Price Calculation interface. That alone does not make the new handler usable on any document. codeunit 7001 "Price Calculation Mgt." decides which handler applies to a given line by looking up table 7006 "Price Calculation Setup", a table of (Code, Method, Type, Asset Type, Implementation, Enabled, Default) rows populated at startup by its own OnFindSupportedSetup event — every implementation codeunit is expected to subscribe to that event and insert its own setup row(s). A handler enum value with no matching setup row is real and selectable in the enum itself, but never chosen for any actual sale, purchase, or job line, because Price Calculation Mgt. has no setup row that names it.

FindSetup resolves a handler in two stages, and only the second one looks at Default. It first asks codeunit 7004 "Price Calculation Dtld. Setup" to match the line against table 7008 "Dtld. Price Calculation Setup" ("Detailed Price Calculation Setup", keyed to an exact Method/Type/Asset Type/Source/Asset No. combination via its own "Setup Code"); on a match it does PriceCalculationSetup.Get(... "Setup Code") directly, with no Default filter. Only when no detailed row matches does it fall back to SetRange(Default, true) plus SetRange(Method, ...) to pick the one catch-all row for that combination. A row without Default := true is invisible to that fallback, but not invisible outright — a detailed-setup row can still select it by naming its Code. A row whose Method matches neither path is invisible either way — same symptom, different cause.

Best Practice

Ship a new Price Calculation Handler value together with an OnFindSupportedSetup subscriber that inserts at least one Price Calculation Setup record naming it as the Implementation, for the relevant Method (e.g. "Lowest Price"), Type (Sale/Purchase), and Asset Type. Default := true is required only when this row is the fallback for that combination — the row FindSetup's own SetRange(Default, true) branch selects when no more specific setup applies. A handler meant to be selected only for specific customers or items should instead be reachable through a matching "Dtld. Price Calculation Setup" row; FindSetup resolves that before it ever checks Default, so it needs no Default := true.

See sample: activate-new-price-calculation-handler-via-onfindsupportedsetup.good.al.

Anti Pattern

Extending Price Calculation Handler and implementing the Price Calculation interface, without subscribing to OnFindSupportedSetup to insert a setup record. The new handler exists, compiles, and can even be selected manually if a user creates their own Price Calculation Setup row through the UI — but ships with no default row, so it's never active for anyone until someone notices it's missing and configures it by hand.

See sample: activate-new-price-calculation-handler-via-onfindsupportedsetup.bad.al.

Source

BCApps (src/Layers/W1/BaseApp/Pricing/Calculation/): PriceCalculationHandler.Enum.al (enum 7011 "Price Calculation Handler" implements "Price Calculation"); PriceCalculationMgt.Codeunit.al (OnFindSupportedSetup(var TempPriceCalculationSetup: Record "Price Calculation Setup" temporary), and FindSetup(...): Boolean, which first calls PriceCalculationDtldSetup.FindSetup(DtldPriceCalcSetup) and on a match does PriceCalculationSetup.Get(... "Setup Code") with no Default filter — only on failure does it fall back to SetRange(Enabled, true), SetRange(Default, true), SetRange(Method, ...)); PriceCalculationSetup.Table.al (table 7006 "Price Calculation Setup": Code, Method, Type, "Asset Type", Implementation, Enabled, Default); PriceCalculationDtldSetup.Codeunit.al (codeunit 7004 "Price Calculation Dtld. Setup", FindSetup(var DtldPriceCalcSetup: Record "Dtld. Price Calculation Setup"): Boolean, matching progressively looser Source Group/Source No./Asset Type/Asset No. combinations — never Default); DtldPriceCalculationSetup.Table.al (table 7008 "Dtld. Price Calculation Setup", Caption "Detailed Price Calculation Setup", "Setup Code" relates to "Price Calculation Setup".Code where(Enabled = const(true)) — no Default condition).

Microsoft Learn, "Extending Price Calculations": "Each codeunit that implements the Price Calculation interface must subscribe to the OnFindSupportedSetup() event... to fill the price calculation setup table." Same article: "You can enter detailed setup records for non-default setup lines... If a matching setup is found its implementation is used... If there is no matching setup exception, we use the default implementation." (https://learn.microsoft.com/dynamics365/business-central/dev-itpro/developer/devenv-extending-best-price-calculations)