bcquality/microsoft/skills/review/al-code-review.md

kind	id	version	title	description	inputs	outputs	bc-version	technologies	countries	application-area	sub-skills
action-skill	al-code-review	1	AL code review	Reviews AL source changes by composing the AL review leaf skills (performance, security, privacy, upgrade, style, UI).	pr-diff file-path	findings-report	all	al	w1	all	microsoft/skills/review/al-performance-review.md microsoft/skills/review/al-security-review.md microsoft/skills/review/al-privacy-review.md microsoft/skills/review/al-upgrade-review.md microsoft/skills/review/al-style-review.md microsoft/skills/review/al-ui-review.md

AL code review

Reviews AL source changes by composing the leaf AL review skills. This is the canonical reference implementation of a super-skill — skill authors writing composed reviews should copy its structure.

al-code-review does not evaluate knowledge files directly. It invokes each of its sub-skills against the same task input, collects their findings-reports, and then performs its own self-review pass over the diff using the agent's built-in BC and AL knowledge. BCQuality knowledge is an additive layer: anything the sub-skills found is cited from BCQuality, and anything the agent finds on its own is validated against BCQuality (cited if matched, suppressed if contradicted, surfaced as an agent finding otherwise). The result is a single rolled-up findings-report that mixes knowledge-backed and agent findings, each clearly tagged via from-sub-skill.

An orchestrator invokes this skill with either a pr-diff (the standard PR-review entry point) or a file-path (single-file review). The skill produces a single JSON document conforming to the DO output contract, extended with sub-results and — when applicable — skipped-sub-skills.

Source

The sub-skills invoked by this skill are those listed in frontmatter sub-skills:

• microsoft/skills/review/al-performance-review.md
• microsoft/skills/review/al-security-review.md
• microsoft/skills/review/al-privacy-review.md
• microsoft/skills/review/al-upgrade-review.md
• microsoft/skills/review/al-style-review.md
• microsoft/skills/review/al-ui-review.md

Additional leaf skills (for example, telemetry, testing) are added by updating the sub-skills list. The skill does not discover sub-skills implicitly.

Relevance

A sub-skill is relevant when both of the following hold:

• The orchestrator has supplied inputs that satisfy the sub-skill's declared inputs.
• The orchestrator has not disabled the sub-skill via configuration.

Per the DO contract, the super-skill MUST NOT filter sub-skills by task content. al-code-review does not inspect the PR diff to predict whether, for example, there is anything for al-security-review to find. Each leaf is responsible for its own task-level applicability decision; leaves signal non-applicability by returning outcome: "not-applicable" or outcome: "no-knowledge".

Sub-skills that fail either check are not invoked and are recorded in skipped-sub-skills:

• reason: "configuration" when the orchestrator disabled the sub-skill.
• reason: "not-applicable" when the orchestrator's inputs do not satisfy the sub-skill's declared inputs.

Worklist

The worklist is the list of sub-skills judged relevant by the previous step. Every sub-skill in the worklist will be invoked in the Action step.

Action

Execution discipline (mandatory)

The Action step is a sequence of discrete iterations, not one combined generation. The contract requires the super-skill to invoke each sub-skill in turn and then perform a self-review pass. Concretely this means:

• Treat each sub-skill in the worklist as its own pass: read the sub-skill's instructions, apply its Source → Relevance → Worklist → Action steps to the orchestrator-supplied inputs, and produce that sub-skill's complete findings-report before moving on.
• Do not collapse multiple sub-skills into one shared reasoning step. Each sub-skill has a distinct knowledge subset and a distinct evaluation procedure; sharing one rolled-up scan dilutes per-skill attention and causes leaves to silently underreport (this has been observed in production: leaf skills returned empty findings[] while their standalone runs against the same diff produced multiple matches).
• The agent self-review pass is its own final iteration. Begin it only after every sub-skill in the worklist has completed and its sub-result is recorded.
• Sub-skills are independent: re-walking the diff once per sub-skill is correct and expected. The output schema accommodates this — sub-results carries one entry per sub-skill, each a complete findings-report.

Roll up sub-skill findings

For each sub-skill in the worklist, executed one at a time per the discipline above:

1. Invoke the sub-skill with the orchestrator's inputs, passing only the subset each sub-skill declares in its inputs.
2. Capture the sub-skill's complete findings-report verbatim and append it to sub-results.
3. If the sub-skill's outcome is failed, stop here for this sub-skill: its findings are not reliable per the DO contract and MUST NOT be copied into the super-skill's top-level findings[] or counted in summary.counts.
4. Otherwise, append each entry from the sub-skill's findings[] to the super-skill's top-level findings[], setting from-sub-skill to the sub-skill's skill.id. For non-citation findings (those whose id is a skill-defined slug rather than a reference path), prefix id with <from-sub-skill>: to prevent collisions across sub-skills. Other finding fields are preserved.

Agent self-review pass

After every sub-skill has produced its sub-result, perform a self-review pass against the same task input using the agent's built-in BC and AL knowledge. BCQuality is an additive knowledge layer: it augments the agent's review judgement, it does not replace it. The goal of this pass is to surface defects the agent recognises on its own — bugs, anti-patterns, error-handling gaps, AL idioms — that the leaf sub-skills did not catch because no BCQuality knowledge file covers them yet.

This pass is mandatory. An empty agent-findings list is acceptable only when the diff is small enough that the leaves have provably exhausted the surface (in practice: PRs of ≤2 files with ≤30 changed lines and at least one sub-skill emitting findings). For larger diffs, returning an empty agent-findings list is a defect — the agent has built-in BC/AL knowledge that the leaves cannot supply, and refusing to apply it is the most common cause of parity loss against agents that do not have a BCQuality layer at all.

Frame the pass by the domains the sub-skills already cover (performance, security, privacy, style, upgrade, UI) and by the cross-cutting concerns that span them (architecture, error handling, resource lifecycle). For each domain, ask whether the diff exhibits a pattern the agent recognises as a defect from general AL knowledge and that the corresponding sub-skill did not flag. The categories are anchors for completeness, not a script: a candidate from any category is in scope, and a candidate from no category is also in scope when the agent has independent grounds for it.

For every candidate the agent identifies in this pass:

1. Validate against BCQuality knowledge. Check the candidate against the knowledge files the sub-skills have already loaded for this task (visible via their references and suppressed lists in sub-results).
   • If a BCQuality knowledge file matches the candidate, upgrade it to a knowledge-backed finding: cite the file in references, set id to the file's path, set from-sub-skill to the sub-skill that owns that knowledge domain, and merge with or deduplicate against any sub-skill finding that already covers the same concern at the same location.
   • If a BCQuality knowledge file explicitly contradicts the candidate (its ## Best Practice or ## Anti Pattern says the opposite of what the agent flagged), suppress the candidate and do not surface it.
   • Otherwise the candidate has no BCQuality coverage; emit it as an agent finding.
2. Emit agent finding. Per DO's Agent findings rules:
   • from-sub-skill: "agent"
   • references: []
   • id is a skill-defined slug prefixed with agent: (for example, agent:missing-error-handling-on-http-call).
   • confidence capped at medium.
   • message is non-empty and self-contained, describing both the issue and a concrete recommendation. A consumer rendering the finding has no knowledge-file footer to fall back on.
   • suggested-code SHOULD be set when the fix is small and mechanical (e.g. removing a few unreachable lines, replacing a Count() > 0 test with not IsEmpty(), declaring a missing Label, adding an else branch to a case over an enum). Omit it when the appropriate fix depends on context the agent cannot determine.

Leaf sub-skills MUST NOT emit agent findings: their scope is bounded by the knowledge subset they evaluate. The self-review pass is a super-skill responsibility.

Suggested-code guidance

For both knowledge-backed findings rolled up from sub-skills and agent findings emitted in the self-review pass, populate findings[].suggested-code whenever a concrete code replacement is unambiguous from the diff context. The payload MUST be a literal replacement for the source lines covered by location (typically a single line, or the line range in location.range) — no diff markers, fences, or commentary. Examples of good candidates: deleting dead code after exit, replacing Count() > 0 with not IsEmpty(), moving an inline Label declaration to a codeunit-level var block, fixing whitespace or keyword casing. Skip suggested-code when the fix requires choosing between multiple defensible alternatives or when the surrounding context the agent cannot see could change the answer.

Sub-skills MAY also emit suggested-code when their knowledge file unambiguously implies the replacement (the .good.al and .bad.al companion examples are useful here). The super-skill copies the field through unchanged.

Summary and rollup

Aggregate summary.counts and summary.coverage as the sums across invoked sub-skills whose outcome is not failed. Agent findings emitted by the super-skill itself contribute to summary.counts but not to summary.coverage (coverage is a sub-skill worklist metric and is undefined for self-review).

suppressed[] at the super-skill level remains empty. Knowledge-file-level suppression is reported by each sub-skill within its own entry in sub-results.

Derive outcome using the DO rollup rules. outcome-reason is populated for partial and failed and SHOULD summarize per-sub-skill state, for example: "al-security-review failed (tool timeout); al-performance-review completed."

Output

Output conforms to the DO output contract, extended with sub-results and skipped-sub-skills. A populated example — both leaves ran, each produced findings:

{
  "skill": { "id": "al-code-review", "version": 1 },
  "outcome": "completed",
  "summary": {
    "counts": { "blocker": 1, "major": 1, "minor": 3, "info": 0 },
    "coverage": { "worklist-size": 4, "items-evaluated": 4 }
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "microsoft/knowledge/performance/filter-before-find.md",
      "severity": "major",
      "message": "FindSet is called on a record variable without any prior SetRange/SetFilter. This forces a full-table scan.",
      "location": {
        "file": "src/Sales/PostingRoutines.Codeunit.al",
        "line": 140,
        "range": { "start-line": 140, "end-line": 144 }
      },
      "references": [
        { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/performance/filter-before-find.md" }
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "from-sub-skill": "al-performance-review"
    },
    {
      "id": "community/knowledge/performance/call-setloadfields-before-filters.md",
      "severity": "minor",
      "message": "SetLoadFields is called after SetRange. Per the referenced guidance the call must come before filters to be folded into the query plan.",
      "location": {
        "file": "src/Sales/PostingRoutines.Codeunit.al",
        "line": 152
      },
      "references": [
        { "path": "community/knowledge/performance/call-setloadfields-before-filters.md" }
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "from-sub-skill": "al-performance-review"
    },
    {
      "id": "microsoft/knowledge/security/use-secrettext-for-credentials.md",
      "severity": "blocker",
      "message": "A bearer token is declared as a Text parameter and passed through the HTTP request path as plain text. The referenced guidance requires credentials to flow as SecretText end-to-end.",
      "location": {
        "file": "src/Integration/ApiClient.Codeunit.al",
        "line": 85,
        "range": { "start-line": 85, "end-line": 89 }
      },
      "references": [
        { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/security/use-secrettext-for-credentials.md" }
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "from-sub-skill": "al-security-review"
    },
    {
      "id": "microsoft/knowledge/security/never-hardcode-secrets-in-al.md",
      "severity": "minor",
      "message": "An API key is assigned from a string literal rather than retrieved from IsolatedStorage or Key Vault at runtime.",
      "location": {
        "file": "src/Integration/ApiClient.Codeunit.al",
        "line": 201
      },
      "references": [
        { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/security/never-hardcode-secrets-in-al.md" }
      ],
      "confidence": "medium",
      "from-sub-skill": "al-security-review"
    },
    {
      "id": "agent:missing-error-handling-on-http-client",
      "severity": "minor",
      "message": "HttpClient.Send is called without inspecting the response status or wrapping the call in a TryFunction. Network or remote-server failures will surface as runtime errors to the user. Recommendation: branch on the HttpResponseMessage.IsSuccessStatusCode and either retry, surface a controlled error, or fall back, depending on the integration's contract.",
      "location": {
        "file": "src/Integration/ApiClient.Codeunit.al",
        "line": 60,
        "range": { "start-line": 60, "end-line": 64 }
      },
      "references": [],
      "confidence": "medium",
      "from-sub-skill": "agent"
    }
  ],
  "suppressed": [],
  "sub-results": [
    {
      "skill": { "id": "al-performance-review", "version": 1 },
      "outcome": "completed",
      "summary": {
        "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 1, "minor": 1, "info": 0 },
        "coverage": { "worklist-size": 2, "items-evaluated": 2 }
      },
      "findings": [
        {
          "id": "microsoft/knowledge/performance/filter-before-find.md",
          "severity": "major",
          "message": "FindSet is called on a record variable without any prior SetRange/SetFilter. This forces a full-table scan.",
          "location": {
            "file": "src/Sales/PostingRoutines.Codeunit.al",
            "line": 140,
            "range": { "start-line": 140, "end-line": 144 }
          },
          "references": [
            { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/performance/filter-before-find.md" }
          ],
          "confidence": "high"
        },
        {
          "id": "community/knowledge/performance/call-setloadfields-before-filters.md",
          "severity": "minor",
          "message": "SetLoadFields is called after SetRange. Per the referenced guidance the call must come before filters to be folded into the query plan.",
          "location": {
            "file": "src/Sales/PostingRoutines.Codeunit.al",
            "line": 152
          },
          "references": [
            { "path": "community/knowledge/performance/call-setloadfields-before-filters.md" }
          ],
          "confidence": "high"
        }
      ],
      "suppressed": []
    },
    {
      "skill": { "id": "al-security-review", "version": 1 },
      "outcome": "completed",
      "summary": {
        "counts": { "blocker": 1, "major": 0, "minor": 1, "info": 0 },
        "coverage": { "worklist-size": 2, "items-evaluated": 2 }
      },
      "findings": [
        {
          "id": "microsoft/knowledge/security/use-secrettext-for-credentials.md",
          "severity": "blocker",
          "message": "A bearer token is declared as a Text parameter and passed through the HTTP request path as plain text. The referenced guidance requires credentials to flow as SecretText end-to-end.",
          "location": {
            "file": "src/Integration/ApiClient.Codeunit.al",
            "line": 85,
            "range": { "start-line": 85, "end-line": 89 }
          },
          "references": [
            { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/security/use-secrettext-for-credentials.md" }
          ],
          "confidence": "high"
        },
        {
          "id": "microsoft/knowledge/security/never-hardcode-secrets-in-al.md",
          "severity": "minor",
          "message": "An API key is assigned from a string literal rather than retrieved from IsolatedStorage or Key Vault at runtime.",
          "location": {
            "file": "src/Integration/ApiClient.Codeunit.al",
            "line": 201
          },
          "references": [
            { "path": "microsoft/knowledge/security/never-hardcode-secrets-in-al.md" }
          ],
          "confidence": "medium"
        }
      ],
      "suppressed": []
    }
  ]
}

The empty-corpus case — BCQuality's state until knowledge files land — rolls up to no-knowledge:

{
  "skill": { "id": "al-code-review", "version": 1 },
  "outcome": "no-knowledge",
  "summary": {
    "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 0, "info": 0 },
    "coverage": { "worklist-size": 0, "items-evaluated": 0 }
  },
  "findings": [],
  "suppressed": [],
  "sub-results": [
    {
      "skill": { "id": "al-performance-review", "version": 1 },
      "outcome": "no-knowledge",
      "summary": { "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 0, "info": 0 }, "coverage": { "worklist-size": 0, "items-evaluated": 0 } },
      "findings": [],
      "suppressed": []
    },
    {
      "skill": { "id": "al-security-review", "version": 1 },
      "outcome": "no-knowledge",
      "summary": { "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 0, "info": 0 }, "coverage": { "worklist-size": 0, "items-evaluated": 0 } },
      "findings": [],
      "suppressed": []
    }
  ]
}