a9f3c50863
The previous LLM-generated knowledge files contained factual
hallucinations. The most visible was the claim that `FindFirst` /
`FindLast` "forces a full-table scan" on an unfiltered record - it does
not; those APIs return a single row via the current key.
Other inaccuracies the audit found and fixed:
* `FindSet(true)` was described as "taking a LockTable". The correct
upstream phrasing is that `FindSet(true)` sets
`ReadIsolation::UpdLock` on the read. UpdLock and LockTable are
related but distinct mechanisms.
* The list of production-scale tables had been invented beyond the
upstream source (e.g. "Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry") without a
citation. The regenerated list matches the ten tables upstream lists
with their P95 row counts.
* `SetLoadFields` guidance had been augmented with an extra mechanism
claim ("the database resolves the filter using the index without
hydrating the value") not present in upstream.
Approach: full regeneration of `microsoft/knowledge/` from the six
upstream BCApps Code Review instruction files, with Microsoft Learn /
the AL language reference as a secondary source. Every claim in every
regenerated file is anchored to a verbatim upstream quote (or a Learn
URL); the audit trail lives in artifacts/trace-<domain>.json on the
session workspace.
The PR #11 transaction/error-handling cluster is preserved verbatim:
* performance/understand-implicit-transaction-boundary.md
* performance/codeunit-run-as-atomic-sub-operation.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/codeunit-run-requires-prior-commit-inside-transaction.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/use-tryfunction-for-error-catching-not-rollback.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/avoid-commit-inside-loops.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* security/commitbehavior-attribute-scopes-explicit-commits.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* testing/transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.{md,good.al,bad.al}
These articles already cite Microsoft Learn and were carefully
cross-referenced; the regeneration skips their topics rather than
duplicating them.
File counts after regeneration:
performance 35 .md (5 preserved + 30 new)
privacy 17 .md
security 18 .md (1 preserved + 17 new)
style 33 .md
testing 1 .md (preserved)
ui 19 .md
upgrade 18 .md
Total 141 atomic knowledge files, each strictly one rule. All pass
.github/scripts/validate_frontmatter.py with 0 errors and 0 warnings.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
1.4 KiB
| bc-version | domain | keywords | technologies | countries | application-area | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
style |
|
|
|
|
APIVersion must follow the pattern vX.Y (or beta)
Description
The APIVersion property on an API page is part of the public URL path: /api/<publisher>/<group>/<version>/<entitySetName>. The platform accepts only two value shapes for it: a vMAJOR.MINOR string such as 'v1.0', 'v2.0', or 'v2.1', or the literal string 'beta' for pre-release endpoints. Anything else — 'v2', '2.0', '1', 'v2.0.0' — is rejected. The major-minor pair lets consumers detect compatibility through URL inspection alone; the explicit 'beta' channel signals "this contract may break without notice."
Best Practice
Start a new public endpoint at 'v1.0'. Bump the minor when adding fields or non-breaking changes; bump the major when changing field types, removing fields, or any breaking change. Use 'beta' for endpoints that are still iterating and SHOULD NOT be consumed by external integrations.
See sample: api-page-version-format.good.al.
Anti Pattern
APIVersion = 'v2' (missing minor), APIVersion = '2.0' (missing v prefix), APIVersion = 'v2.0.0' (extra segment). All three either fail to compile or produce a URL that consumers cannot reach.
See sample: api-page-version-format.bad.al.