bcquality/community/knowledge/testing/use-library-codeunits-for-test-fixtures.md

bc-version	domain	keywords	technologies	countries	application-area
all	testing	library-codeunits fixtures test-data number-series prerequisite	al	w1	all

Build fixtures with the test Library codeunits, not hand-rolled Init/Insert

Description

BC ships a layer of test Library codeunits — LibrarySales, LibraryPurchase, LibraryERM, LibraryInventory, LibraryRandom and many more — whose job is to create valid records. CreateCustomer assigns a number from the customer number series, fills the mandatory fields, and satisfies the table relations the platform enforces; CreateItem does the same for items. Hand-rolling Customer.Init/Customer.Insert with invented values skips the number series and any field a future app version adds as mandatory, so the fixture is invalid the moment it is created and rots silently as the schema evolves. Prefer the Library codeunits for prerequisite data: they encode the setup the platform requires and are maintained alongside the base app.

Best Practice

Reach for the matching Library codeunit before writing manual record setup: LibrarySales.CreateCustomer, LibrarySales.CreateSalesHeader/CreateSalesLine, LibraryInventory.CreateItem, LibraryERM.CreateGLAccount, and LibraryRandom.RandInt/RandDec for values. Pass the records they return into the code under test. The fixtures stay valid across upgrades because the library — not your test — owns the knowledge of what a well-formed record requires.

See sample: use-library-codeunits-for-test-fixtures.good.al.

Anti Pattern

Customer.Init(); Customer."No." := 'X'; Customer.Insert(); — a record with a hand-picked primary key, no number-series entry, and none of the mandatory fields a real customer needs. It compiles and may even insert, but it bypasses setup the production code assumes, and it breaks the first time the schema gains a required field the test does not know about.

See sample: use-library-codeunits-for-test-fixtures.bad.al.