mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 17:36:53 +01:00
a9f3c50863
The previous LLM-generated knowledge files contained factual
hallucinations. The most visible was the claim that `FindFirst` /
`FindLast` "forces a full-table scan" on an unfiltered record - it does
not; those APIs return a single row via the current key.
Other inaccuracies the audit found and fixed:
* `FindSet(true)` was described as "taking a LockTable". The correct
upstream phrasing is that `FindSet(true)` sets
`ReadIsolation::UpdLock` on the read. UpdLock and LockTable are
related but distinct mechanisms.
* The list of production-scale tables had been invented beyond the
upstream source (e.g. "Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry") without a
citation. The regenerated list matches the ten tables upstream lists
with their P95 row counts.
* `SetLoadFields` guidance had been augmented with an extra mechanism
claim ("the database resolves the filter using the index without
hydrating the value") not present in upstream.
Approach: full regeneration of `microsoft/knowledge/` from the six
upstream BCApps Code Review instruction files, with Microsoft Learn /
the AL language reference as a secondary source. Every claim in every
regenerated file is anchored to a verbatim upstream quote (or a Learn
URL); the audit trail lives in artifacts/trace-<domain>.json on the
session workspace.
The PR #11 transaction/error-handling cluster is preserved verbatim:
* performance/understand-implicit-transaction-boundary.md
* performance/codeunit-run-as-atomic-sub-operation.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/codeunit-run-requires-prior-commit-inside-transaction.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/use-tryfunction-for-error-catching-not-rollback.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/avoid-commit-inside-loops.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* security/commitbehavior-attribute-scopes-explicit-commits.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* testing/transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.{md,good.al,bad.al}
These articles already cite Microsoft Learn and were carefully
cross-referenced; the regeneration skips their topics rather than
duplicating them.
File counts after regeneration:
performance 35 .md (5 preserved + 30 new)
privacy 17 .md
security 18 .md (1 preserved + 17 new)
style 33 .md
testing 1 .md (preserved)
ui 19 .md
upgrade 18 .md
Total 141 atomic knowledge files, each strictly one rule. All pass
.github/scripts/validate_frontmatter.py with 0 errors and 0 warnings.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
26 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
bc-version: [all]
|
|
domain: privacy
|
|
keywords: [privacy-notice, consent, http-client, outgoing-request, external-service, getprivacynoticeapprovalstate]
|
|
technologies: [al]
|
|
countries: [w1]
|
|
application-area: [all]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Outgoing requests to external services require a Privacy Notice consent check
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
Business Central ships a built-in Privacy Notice framework that the admin uses to grant or withhold per-integration consent for sending data to external services. The relevant API surface is `Codeunit "Privacy Notice"` (consent checks via `GetPrivacyNoticeApprovalState()`), `Codeunit "Privacy Notice Registrations"` (well-known notice IDs for integrations such as Exchange, OneDrive, Teams), and the `Enum "Privacy Notice Approval State"` with values `Agreed`, `Disagreed`, and `Not Set`. The admin UI is the **Privacy Notices Status** page. The compliance concern in code review is therefore not that personal data is included in an outgoing HTTP body — that is normal business functionality — but that the code path issuing the request contains no `PrivacyNotice.GetPrivacyNoticeApprovalState(...)` check.
|
|
|
|
## Best Practice
|
|
|
|
Before issuing an outgoing HTTP request to an external service, verify `PrivacyNotice.GetPrivacyNoticeApprovalState(<integration id>) = "Privacy Notice Approval State"::Agreed`. The check does not have to live next to the `HttpClient.Post` call — it can sit anywhere upstream in the same code path (for example in the page's `OnOpenPage`, in a wizard step, or in a setup action) as long as no execution path reaches the request without passing through it.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `privacy-notice-consent-for-external-data-transfer.good.al`.
|
|
|
|
## Anti Pattern
|
|
|
|
A `procedure SendDataToExternalService(...)` that posts customer data to an external endpoint with no `PrivacyNotice.GetPrivacyNoticeApprovalState` anywhere upstream. The same anti-pattern applies in reverse: removing an existing privacy-notice check from code that still issues the external call.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `privacy-notice-consent-for-external-data-transfer.bad.al`.
|