bcquality/community/knowledge/events/expose-process-context-via-manually-bound-flag.md

bc-version	domain	keywords	technologies	countries	application-area
all	events	bindsubscription manual-binding eventsubscriberinstance internalevent singleinstance process-context running-flag scoped-state rollback	al	w1	all

Expose process context through a manually bound flag, not a single-instance boolean

Contributions welcome — open a PR to refine or extend this article.

Description

When an extension drives a process over shared code — a base application report, a posting routine — other extensions hooked into that code cannot tell whether a run belongs to that process: AL keeps no ambient "current process", so the driving app has to publish the context itself. The reflex answer, a SingleInstance codeunit holding a boolean set at the start of the run and cleared at the end, is unsafe: single-instance variables are not part of the database transaction, so a failed run rolls back the writes but not the flag, which stays true until the company is closed and marks every later run in the session as part of the process. A manual event binding carries the same signal safely, because the platform ties its lifetime to a variable's scope instead of to cleanup code that has to run.

Best Practice

Publish the context as a query and let the binding itself be the state. One procedure is public; everything behind it is internal:

• A public context codeunit exposes IsProcessRunning(): Boolean, which raises an [InternalEvent] publisher taking a var Boolean and returns what comes back — the entire public surface. The publisher is internal because only the owning app subscribes, local because only this codeunit raises it.
• A second codeunit, Access = Internal with EventSubscriberInstance = Manual, subscribes to that event and sets the boolean to true. Internal keeps it out of the API and stops other apps binding it to forge the context; it stores nothing between runs — being bound is the state.
• The driving process calls BindSubscription on a variable whose scope is exactly the span it wants to claim: a local in the procedure that drives the run, or a global on an object that lives exactly as long as the run. While that variable is alive the query answers true; when it leaves scope — normally, or because an error unwound the call stack — the platform removes the binding and the query answers false again.

Bind a fresh instance per run rather than reusing one: the platform refuses to bind the same instance twice but accepts several instances of the same codeunit, so nesting and re-entrancy need no counter. The binding is session-scoped, so work the process starts in another session — a background session, a page background task, a job queue entry — cannot see it; pass the context explicitly there.

See sample: expose-process-context-via-manually-bound-flag.good.al.

Anti Pattern

Two shapes.

First, the single-instance boolean — the failure described above. Detection: a SingleInstance = true codeunit with a boolean set before a process and cleared after it, read by other code to decide whether that process is running.

Second, the context kept private: the driving app arranges its own marker — typically a manually bound subscriber on an event added for its benefit alone — and offers no query, or only an internal one. Other extensions are left inferring the context from side effects, request-page values, or record state, which breaks silently the first time the process changes. Detection: a manual binding used purely as an internal run marker, with no public query procedure over it.

The mirror-image anti-pattern belongs to the reviewer: flagging the BindSubscription here as a leaked binding because no UnbindSubscription follows it. Scope release is the mechanism, not an omission — see microsoft/knowledge/events/choose-static-vs-manual-subscribers-deliberately.md, whose leak case is an instance parked on a SingleInstance global that never leaves scope.

See sample: expose-process-context-via-manually-bound-flag.bad.al.