The article's detection guidance flags 'a parameter added' on any shipped procedure. Applied to an event publisher that is bound to rather than called, this produced a false positive on BCApps PR 10278, where a trailing var parameter was appended to the existing IntegrationEvent OnAfterOpenForRecRef and the developer twice replied that adding a parameter to an existing integration event is not a breaking change. It also contradicted events/add-new-event-parameters-at-the-end, which already states that existing subscribers still bind to the leading parameters. Scope the rule to called procedures, carve out appended event parameters as additive, and keep every other event signature edit - removal, reorder, retype, var flip - in scope. Point the IsHandled case at events/do-not-add-ishandled-to-an-existing-event, which owns that semantic concern.
3.1 KiB
| bc-version | domain | keywords | technologies | countries | application-area | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
breaking-changes |
|
|
|
|
Do not change the signature of a published procedure
Description
A procedure that is reachable from outside its object — any procedure not marked local (and, for on-prem-scoped code, anything a dependent app can still bind to) — is a contract. Once another extension compiles against it, changing its shape breaks that extension at build time. Signature changes include adding, removing, or reordering parameters, changing a parameter or return type, and toggling a parameter between by-value and var (by-reference). The platform treats the procedure's identity as its full signature, so even a "compatible-looking" tweak is a new method to dependents. There is exactly one safe edit: naming a previously unnamed return value, which adds no caller obligation. LLMs routinely "improve" a public procedure in place by adding a parameter, not realizing every consumer must be recompiled.
This rule governs procedures that dependents call. An event publisher — a procedure carrying [IntegrationEvent] or [BusinessEvent], conventionally declared local — is bound to, not called, and binds on a leading prefix of its parameter list. Appending a new parameter at the end of a shipped event therefore leaves every existing subscriber binding successfully, so it is additive rather than breaking and must not be flagged under this rule. See events/add-new-event-parameters-at-the-end. Every other edit to a published event signature — removing, reordering, or retyping a parameter, or flipping one to or from var — still breaks binding and is in scope here. Appending var IsHandled: Boolean is a separate concern: it binds fine but changes the event's contract, and is covered by events/do-not-add-ishandled-to-an-existing-event.
Best Practice
Treat a published signature as frozen. When new behavior needs more inputs, add a new procedure or overload alongside the original — for example a CalculateDiscountWithRate(Amount; Rate) next to the unchanged CalculateDiscount(Amount) — and let the old one delegate to the new one. Existing callers keep compiling; new callers opt into the richer entry point. Naming an unnamed return value is the one in-place change that is always safe.
See sample: do-not-change-published-procedure-signatures.good.al.
Anti Pattern
Editing the existing public procedure's parameter list — here, adding a Rate parameter to CalculateDiscount — so every dependent extension that called the old form fails to compile. Detection: a parameter added, removed, reordered, retyped, or flipped to/from var, or a changed return type, on any non-local procedure that already shipped. Add a new overload instead. Exclude event publishers whose only change is a parameter appended at the end of the list: subscribers bind on the leading prefix, so that edit is additive and reporting it here is a false positive.
See sample: do-not-change-published-procedure-signatures.bad.al.