mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
186d8a1314
* Complete AL review knowledge readiness Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Generalize review fixture discovery Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Preserve published field IDs in sample Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Clarify published field identity rules State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Align field obsoletion sample baselines Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 --------- Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
26 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
bc-version: [17..]
|
|
domain: telemetry
|
|
keywords: [telemetryscope, extensionpublisher, all, audience, logmessage, application-insights]
|
|
technologies: [al]
|
|
countries: [w1]
|
|
application-area: [all]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Choose TelemetryScope by who must receive the signal
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
`TelemetryScope::ExtensionPublisher` sends a custom trace only to the Application Insights resource configured by the extension publisher. `TelemetryScope::All` also sends it to the environment's telemetry, where the customer or partner operating the tenant can query it. The compiler accepts either value, so a plausible-looking scope can silently hide an actionable signal from tenant operators or expose publisher-only implementation noise to them.
|
|
|
|
## Best Practice
|
|
|
|
Use `ExtensionPublisher` for internal diagnostics that only the app publisher can interpret, such as cache behavior or private algorithm state. Use `All` for signals the tenant operator can act on, such as an integration failure, quota warning, or setup problem. Decide the audience independently from `DataClassification`; privacy guidance still governs whether the payload may be emitted at all.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `choose-telemetry-scope-by-audience.good.al`.
|
|
|
|
## Anti Pattern
|
|
|
|
Defaulting every call to `All`, including low-level implementation diagnostics, or defaulting every call to `ExtensionPublisher` and thereby hiding customer-actionable failures from environment telemetry. Review only when the message and surrounding branch make the intended audience clear; an ambiguous diagnostic is not enough to infer the wrong scope.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `choose-telemetry-scope-by-audience.bad.al`.
|