mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
186d8a1314
* Complete AL review knowledge readiness Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Generalize review fixture discovery Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Preserve published field IDs in sample Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Clarify published field identity rules State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Align field obsoletion sample baselines Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 --------- Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
26 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
bc-version: [all]
|
|
domain: testing
|
|
keywords: [testpermissions, restrictive, disabled, permissions-mock, lower-permissions, super, permission-test]
|
|
technologies: [al]
|
|
countries: [w1]
|
|
application-area: [all]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Permission tests must actually lower the execution context
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
`TestPermissions` describes how a test runner should establish the permission context; the enum value does not itself assign the business permission set being tested. `Restrictive` is the default and starts from D365 Full Access, requiring the test to lower permissions. `Disabled` leaves the test running as `SUPER`. A test that expects access to be denied while still running with either broad context can pass or fail for the wrong reason and never exercise the intended boundary.
|
|
|
|
## Best Practice
|
|
|
|
Use `TestPermissions::Restrictive` for a permission-sensitive test and lower the current test user with the test framework's `"Permissions Mock"` or `"Library - Lower Permissions"` before invoking the protected operation. Assign the exact permission set the scenario claims to test and restore or stop the mock afterward. Use `Disabled` only for suites that do not assert permission behavior.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `permission-tests-must-lower-the-execution-context.good.al`.
|
|
|
|
## Anti Pattern
|
|
|
|
Setting `TestPermissions = Disabled` or leaving the effective D365 Full Access context in place while asserting that a limited user is denied, or adding a `[TestPermissions(...)]` attribute without any runner/test-library code that applies the intended permission set.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `permission-tests-must-lower-the-execution-context.bad.al`.
|