mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
186d8a1314
* Complete AL review knowledge readiness Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Generalize review fixture discovery Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Preserve published field IDs in sample Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Clarify published field identity rules State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Align field obsoletion sample baselines Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 --------- Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
26 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
bc-version: [18..]
|
|
domain: telemetry
|
|
keywords: [featuretelemetry, logusage, logerror, success, tryfunction, feature-usage]
|
|
technologies: [al]
|
|
countries: [w1]
|
|
application-area: [all]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Call FeatureTelemetry.LogUsage only after successful use
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
`FeatureTelemetry.LogUsage` means that a user successfully used the feature. An attempt belongs in the uptake funnel, while a failed operation belongs in `LogError`. Logging usage before checking the result inflates adoption metrics with failed attempts and makes usage telemetry disagree with the actual business outcome.
|
|
|
|
## Best Practice
|
|
|
|
Call `LogUsage` only after the operation has completed successfully. On a failure path, call `LogError` with the captured error text and call stack when the failure must be emitted explicitly. Use a past-tense event name for usage and a present-tense scenario name for errors.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `feature-usage-only-after-success.good.al`.
|
|
|
|
## Anti Pattern
|
|
|
|
Calling `LogUsage` before a Boolean result, `TryFunction`, `Codeunit.Run`, or HTTP status has been checked, or calling it in both success and failure branches. Do not flag an attempt recorded with `LogUptake(...Used)`; unlike `LogUsage`, that state intentionally records an attempt.
|
|
|
|
See sample: `feature-usage-only-after-success.bad.al`.
|