0980397d27
Converts Jesper's existing AL security-review prompt into BCQuality seed
knowledge articles so the al-security-review leaf has a real corpus to
match against. Mirrors the performance seed phase.
Articles under microsoft/knowledge/security/ (16):
- Permission model: follow-least-privilege-in-permission-sets,
use-indirect-permissions-for-elevated-access,
use-inherent-permissions-to-grant-minimal-access
- Secrets: never-hardcode-secrets-in-al,
use-isolated-storage-for-module-and-company-secrets,
prefer-azure-key-vault-for-production-secrets,
use-secrettext-for-credentials, use-secrettext-with-httpclient,
compose-secrets-with-secretstrsubstno,
use-nondebuggable-when-parsing-secrets
- External calls: require-https-for-external-calls,
set-timeouts-for-external-calls, do-not-put-credentials-in-urls
- Error handling: avoid-sensitive-data-in-error-messages,
do-not-swallow-security-errors-silently
- Extensibility: do-not-expose-sensitive-data-in-event-publishers
Paired AL samples under samples/security/<slug>/{bad,good}.al, object
IDs 50200-50231 (no overlap with performance 50100-50140).
Rubber-duck findings addressed:
- HttpClient secret-URI: SetSecretRequestUri is on HttpRequestMessage
(not HttpClient). Rewrote use-secrettext-with-httpclient and its
good sample to use HttpRequestMessage + HttpClient.Send.
- InherentPermissions only grants access to same-extension objects;
the sample now defines its own table 50230 "Sec Sample Lookup" and
grants 'r' on that, not on Database::Customer.
- Reworked compose-secrets-with-secretstrsubstno bad.al away from
Format(SecretText) (unreliable) to a plain Text+StrSubstNo anti-
pattern.
- Moved normative guidance out of Description in three articles
(compose-secrets-..., prefer-azure-key-vault-..., use-inherent-...)
so it sits in Best Practice / Anti Pattern per READ contract.
- Added a companion helper codeunit (50231) to the indirect-permissions
good sample so it actually demonstrates the controlled write path.
- Rebuilt the event-publisher good/bad pair on the same ExportCustomer
scenario so the contrast is the shape of the event signature, not a
different event.
Also: broaden samples/README.md object-ID range note to 50100-50299.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
1.3 KiB
| bc-version | domain | keywords | technologies | countries | application-area | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
security |
|
|
|
|
Do not put credentials in URLs
Seed article. Converted from an existing security-review prompt to bootstrap the BCQuality security corpus. Domain stewards should expand, restructure, and refine as needed.
Description
URL query strings and path segments are routinely captured in web-server access logs, browser history, proxy logs, platform telemetry, and exception traces. A credential placed anywhere in the URL therefore persists across systems the extension does not control, and is typically retained far longer than the secret's intended lifetime.
Best Practice
Transport credentials in Authorization headers, carried as SecretText end-to-end (see use-secrettext-with-httpclient). Where the URI itself must carry a secret (for example, a pre-signed URL), build it with SecretStrSubstNo and pass it via SetSecretRequestUri so it is never materialized as Text.
See sample: samples/security/do-not-put-credentials-in-urls/good.al.
Anti Pattern
Appending '?api_key=' + Key to a request URL, or embedding a token in a path segment, then calling HttpClient.Get with the resulting Text URL.
See sample: samples/security/do-not-put-credentials-in-urls/bad.al.