Commit graph

189 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Dieringer
4a95985c8c Fix four merge-critical issues from Jesper's 2026-09-22 review
- pages-must-not-contain-business-logic.good.al/.bad.al: the "good"
  codeunit still directly assigned real Sales Line."Line Amount" and
  called Modify(), bypassing the field's normal Validate cascade
  (discount, VAT, related-amount maintenance) - persisting inconsistent
  document lines regardless of which object the code lived in. Replaced
  the real Sales Line example with a self-contained "Sample Order Line"
  table and switched the codeunit to Validate()/Modify(true), so the
  fixture demonstrates the page-vs-codeunit separation without teaching
  unsafe direct field writes to a real BC document table.
- bcpt-scenarios-must-be-app-specific.good.al: Customer.FindFirst()
  assumed a pre-existing customer (fails against an empty environment),
  and a session-local NextNo counter for the header key collides across
  concurrent BCPT sessions and repeated runs. Creates its own customer
  when none exists, and generates keys from CreateGuid() instead of an
  in-memory counter.
- upgrade-tag-logic-must-not-nest-deeply: the rule conflated two
  different things - nesting one tag's existence check inside another
  (the real anti-pattern Microsoft's guidance warns against) with
  having business-data safety conditions inside a single tagged
  migration's own loop body (which Microsoft's own worked example does,
  and its own design guidance explicitly requires: "Implement extra
  safety checks to avoid data corruption, even though you're using
  upgrade tags"). Rewrote the Description/Best Practice/Anti Pattern to
  scope the rule to actual tag nesting and migrations blended under one
  tag, and rewrote both fixtures: good.al now shows two safety
  conditions correctly nested inside one migration's own loop plus a
  second, genuinely separate migration as its own flat tagged
  procedure; bad.al now shows the real anti-pattern, one tag's check
  nested inside another's guarded body.
- table-design-must-match-bc-table-type-conventions: the rule and its
  worklist cue fired on any new table with a keys block, forcing
  buffers, queues, logs, mapping tables, and staging tables into the
  nearest-looking one of nine business-record archetypes. Added an
  explicit scope note that these nine types aren't an exhaustive table
  catalogue, and narrowed the al-data-modeling-review.md cue to require
  positive evidence (a type-specific naming suffix, key shape, or
  usage) before worklisting, instead of a bare keys/primary-key
  declaration.
2026-09-22 14:41:49 +02:00
Michael Dieringer
67962727f6 Fix ten focused correctness items plus sample links from Jesper's 2026-09-15 re-review
Six carried-over threads:
- api-page-least-privilege-write-access fixtures: added the mandatory
  EntityName/EntitySetName properties (AL0485).
- pages-must-not-contain-business-logic fixtures: Sales Line has no
  "Total Amount" field; replaced with the real "Line Amount" (field 103).
- test-feature-scenario-tags.good.al and test-one-when-per-test.good.al:
  CreatePriceHeader leaves a price list in Draft status, which price
  calculation ignores. Added Validate(Status, Active) + Modify before the
  sales line that depends on it. Verified Status field/enum against
  PriceListHeader.Table.al and PriceStatus.Enum.al in the BCApps clone.
- exposed-objects-must-be-in-a-permission-set.md: a published codeunit is
  a SOAP endpoint (SOAP is deprecated), not OData - Page/Query are the
  OData object types. Corrected and pointed new integrations at API
  pages/queries instead.
- al-error-handling-review.md: the log-writes-must-survive-rollback cue
  selected on Session.StartSession, which only appears in the compliant
  fix, never in the anti-pattern - the bad fixture could never be
  worklisted. Recued on the actual risk shape (log insert around a
  failed TryFunction/GetLastError* path, then raise/propagate), with
  StartSession as an explicit compliant discriminator instead.
- page-design-must-match-bc-page-type-conventions.md: the enum value is
  NavigatePage, not Navigate; noted the type list is a selected subset,
  not an exhaustive PageType catalogue (PromptDialog, ConfigurationDialog,
  UserControlHost, XmlPort also exist, out of this article's scope).

Four new correctness gaps:
- release-must-update-app-version.md: "the version is the only identity"
  was backwards - id is the app's stable identity, version identifies a
  release/code-state of it.
- defensive-vs-offensive-code-must-match-blast-radius.good.al: the "low
  blast radius" example had no else branch, so a failed Customer.Get()
  left the field at its prior/default value instead of the explicit
  chosen fallback the article claims to demonstrate. Added the else.
- bcpt-scenarios-must-be-app-specific.good.al: InitTest and both measured
  StartScenario/EndScenario sections were empty/comment-only, so the
  "app-specific" fixture measured no actual work. Filled in a real,
  self-contained header+line creation path.
- upgrade-tag-logic-must-not-nest-deeply.good.al: the flattened version
  dropped both safety conditions the bad fixture had (Discount % = 0,
  nonblank posting group), silently changing behavior instead of just
  removing nesting. Extracted the guarded update into a helper with both
  conditions preserved as early exits.

Also converted this PR's remaining plain-backtick "See sample:" sample
references (16 articles) to the READ-convention markdown-link form,
matching the fix already made on #156/#158.

Rebased onto upstream/main (conflicts in al-ui-review.md, al-style-review.md,
al-upgrade-review.md against merged upstream PRs - all additive, both
sides' worklist cues retained).
2026-09-21 22:44:17 +02:00
Michael Dieringer
3842ef7138 Address second round of Jesper Schulz-Wedde's review on PR #157
- log-writes-must-survive-rollback.good.al: fixed invalid trigger
  OnRun(var Rec: ...) declaration; Rec is implicit when TableNo is set.
- exposed-objects-must-be-in-a-permission-set.md: distinguished the three
  exposure mechanisms (page/query web service or API, codeunit published
  as a web service, [ServiceEnabled] bound action on a page) and their
  actual permission targets (page/query "..." = X vs codeunit "..." = X).
- code-must-not-change-workdate.md: scoped from an absolute "never" to
  "not as a side effect of unrelated logic" - verified real WorkDate(x)
  setter usage in BCApps demo-data generators and test codeunits.
- bcpt-scenarios-must-be-app-specific.md: SingleInstance and
  StartScenario/EndScenario reframed as context-dependent patterns, not
  mandatory requirements - BCPT Create Customer uses neither.
- test-feature-scenario-tags.good.al/.bad.al: replaced the invented
  LibrarySales.CreateCustomerWithPrice/"Item Price Mgt." calls with a real,
  verified price-list-line test using Library - Sales/Library - Inventory/
  Library - Price Calculation.
- page-design-must-match-bc-page-type-conventions.md: scoped the missing
  UsageCategory anti-pattern to pages intended as searchable entry points.
- defensive-vs-offensive-code-must-match-blast-radius.md/.good.al/.bad.al:
  replaced the VAT registration number "low blast radius" example with a
  genuinely cosmetic field (customer home page URL).
- source-organized-by-feature-not-object-type.md: anti-pattern reframed as
  inconsistency with a repo's own convention, not the object-type scheme
  itself.
- pictures-must-use-media-not-blob.md: removed leftover "image variants"
  wording contradicting the already-corrected MediaSet description.

Proactively fixed while sweeping all fixtures for invented APIs:
- given-blocks-must-cover-full-precondition-chain.bad.al: PostSalesOrder
  called with wrong arity and referenced an undeclared variable.
- ui-test-codeunit-naming.good.al/.bad.al: replaced the same fake
  "Item Price Mgt."/TestPage "Item Price" with real Library - Sales calls
  and the real Customer Card TestPage.

Worklist completeness: added review-skill cues for the 12 of 18 new rules
that had none (al-appsource-review.md, al-data-modeling-review.md,
al-error-handling-review.md, al-security-review.md, al-style-review.md x3,
al-testing-review.md x2, al-ui-review.md, al-upgrade-review.md,
al-web-services-review.md), and fixed test-feature-scenario-tags' cue,
which only matched the compliant (tagged) shape instead of the anti-pattern
(untagged/generic-named test).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 22:43:46 +02:00
Michael Dieringer
0120b874b2 Address Jesper Schulz-Wedde's review on PR #157
- release-must-update-app-version.md: reframe around AppSource's actual
  strict full-version-ordering requirement; scope branching-policy
  claims as team convention, not platform rule.
- pictures-must-use-media-not-blob.md: MediaSet is a collection of
  independent media objects, not automatic image variants/thumbnails.
- log-writes-must-survive-rollback.{md,good.al}: StartSession's only
  data channel into the new session is its Record parameter to a
  TableNo-scoped codeunit; a setter called on a local instance before
  starting the session populates nothing in the new session.
- exposed-objects-must-be-in-a-permission-set.md: correct the three
  exposure mechanisms (Web Services config, PageType/QueryType=API,
  ServiceEnabled as a method-only attribute).
- pages-must-not-contain-business-logic.md: scope to persisted
  mutations and cross-entry-point rules; presentation-only
  calculations and table-owned invariants are not violations.
- given-blocks-must-cover-full-precondition-chain.good.al: replace
  invented LibrarySales calls with the real API
  (CreateCustomer/CreateSalesOrderForCustomerNo/PostSalesDocument).
- test-feature-scenario-tags.{md,good.al}: move [SCENARIO] inside the
  test procedure body to match the current BCApps corpus; keep
  [FEATURE] at codeunit level per Microsoft's own documented option.
- ui-test-codeunit-naming.md: scope the _UT suffix and adjacent-ID
  pairing as an explicit team convention, not a BCApps-wide standard.
- page-design-must-match-bc-page-type-conventions.md /
  table-design-must-match-bc-table-type-conventions.md: Card's
  single-key primary-key claim is a contextual heuristic, not a
  mandatory constraint (Ship-to Address, Customer/Vendor Bank Account
  are real composite-key Card pages); a Subsidiary table with its own
  identity commonly gets List+Card, not Worksheet/Tabular.
- api-page-least-privilege-write-access.{md,good.al}: only page-placed
  fields are ever exposed; set InsertAllowed/DeleteAllowed=false in the
  good sample so a narrow field set can't still create/delete records.
- source-organized-by-feature-not-object-type.md,
  test-one-when-per-test.md: scope as team/testing-design conventions,
  not Microsoft platform requirements.
- upgrade-tag-logic-must-not-nest-deeply.md: add the Microsoft Learn
  citation that already backs the two-level nesting limit.
- Wire the new articles into the testing/data-modeling/error-handling/
  security/ui review skills' candidate-selection signals.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 22:43:16 +02:00
Michael Dieringer
a4d85c3e9e Add 18 more community AL/BC patterns across appsource, data-modeling, error-handling, security, style, testing, ui, upgrade, and web-services
Second contribution from CURABIS ApS, generalized from patterns observed across real AppSource/PTE development. Cross-checked against the current microsoft/knowledge corpus before opening; several originally-drafted candidates were dropped as duplicates of existing files.
2026-09-21 22:42:49 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
07e324ddbc
Add source-verified Finance knowledge and review domain (#57)
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate skill index and report schemas / validate-contract (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
* Add Finance posting domain-knowledge pilot

Adds three atomic domain-rule knowledge files under community/knowledge/finance/ as a pilot for Type-A (normative) Business Central domain knowledge: post through the posting engine, treat posted ledger entries as immutable, and treat the Dimension Set ID as the source of truth for dimensions. Includes a good/bad AL sample pair for the posting rule.

These encode BC-specific invariants that LLMs reliably get wrong, fitting the existing remedial/atomic knowledge grain with no schema or contract changes. Passes the repo frontmatter validator and is discovered by the knowledge index.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Clarify editable operational fields on posted ledger entries

Addresses review feedback from @JeremyVyska on PR #57: the immutability rule applies to financial content, not the whole entry. Reframes the Description around financial content and gives the operational-field exception (payment/application data, on-hold, applies-to, communication fields edited via CustEntry-Edit/VendEntry-Edit and the ledger entry pages) its own paragraph in Best Practice instead of understating it as a narrow set.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Expand Finance pilot into a source-verified review domain

Move Finance knowledge to the Microsoft-owned layer, add nine scoped rules with eighteen AL samples, and register bounded Finance review with complete paired evaluation coverage.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix Finance review applicability and ownership boundaries

Remove application-area gating and later VAT-field dependencies, align dynamic shared conventions, separate SCM ownership, and keep journal examples focused on the intended invariant.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove logo branding (#194)

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add title and description to README

* Add foundational AL developer knowledge (#195)

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Clarify locale-safe DateFormula Evaluate inputs (#193)

* Clarify locale-safe DateFormula Evaluate inputs

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Normalize DateFormula article sections

Keep the analyzer-gap explanation in Description and its scoped probe evidence in References, without a novel Validation section. Normative guidance and fixtures are unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add SCM functional knowledge domain (#192)

* Add SCM functional knowledge domain

Introduce nine source-backed rules with original AL sample pairs, bounded SCM review routing, and complete positive/clean evaluation coverage.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Normalize SCM knowledge and review ownership

Align article and AL sample conventions, keep BC facts separate from review mechanics, and clarify reciprocal Finance ownership without bespoke shared test assertions.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-21 10:20:41 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
bec8890b7e
Add SCM functional knowledge domain (#192)
* Add SCM functional knowledge domain

Introduce nine source-backed rules with original AL sample pairs, bounded SCM review routing, and complete positive/clean evaluation coverage.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Normalize SCM knowledge and review ownership

Align article and AL sample conventions, keep BC facts separate from review mechanics, and clarify reciprocal Finance ownership without bespoke shared test assertions.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-21 10:16:44 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
d38377b85e
Clarify locale-safe DateFormula Evaluate inputs (#193)
* Clarify locale-safe DateFormula Evaluate inputs

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Normalize DateFormula article sections

Keep the analyzer-gap explanation in Description and its scoped probe evidence in References, without a novel Validation section. Normative guidance and fixtures are unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-21 10:16:07 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
dd833133e0
Add foundational AL developer knowledge (#195)
Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-21 10:15:39 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
38ad6b8810
Add title and description to README
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate skill index and report schemas / validate-contract (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
2026-09-18 09:07:57 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
523fc88f87
Remove logo branding (#194)
Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-18 09:05:29 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
b91443beec
Update logo width in README
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate skill index and report schemas / validate-contract (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
Reduced logo width in README from 500 to 300 pixels.
2026-09-17 13:38:34 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
d209cd0f73
Left-align README logo (#191)
* Add BCQuality logo and brand assets

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove brand assets link from README

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Use horizontal logo banner in README

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Enlarge banner wordmark

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-17 13:38:04 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
2b96f5226d
Update logo width and remove project title
Reduced logo width in README and removed title.
2026-09-17 13:35:46 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
450e5965e1
Add BCQuality logo and brand assets (#190)
* Add BCQuality logo and brand assets

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove brand assets link from README

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Use horizontal logo banner in README

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Enlarge banner wordmark

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-17 13:34:22 +02:00
dcenic
8ff2326b61
Merge pull request #187 from microsoft/dcenic-validate-unauthenticated-responses
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate skill index and report schemas / validate-contract (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
Code reviewer skill for recognizing and validating unauthenticated responses
2026-09-16 09:50:14 +02:00
Djordje Cenic
5bda054927 Link samples using the READ markdown-link convention
Use [\slug.good.al\](slug.good.al) form so tools/Knowledge-Retrieval.ps1
Assert-SampleLink validation passes.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 13:48:59 +02:00
Djordje Cenic
58b3be23ab Name the three required checks explicitly: response size, schema compliance, content integrity
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 13:19:37 +02:00
Djordje Cenic
2c45021cb3 Add security knowledge: validate unauthenticated endpoint responses
New remedial article for spotting when AL calls an endpoint that does not
authenticate itself to the client (bare HttpClient.Get, blank SOAP SecretText,
post-DisableHttpsCheck HTTP) and requires the response to be size-, schema-, and
request/response-integrity-validated before it is trusted. Includes the
BC-specific false-positive clarifications (platform buffers the full body, so an
in-AL size check after buffering is correct; no DNS-rebinding/bounded-read demand;
HTTPS not always enforceable) plus good/bad AL samples.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 13:16:53 +02:00
Stefano Demiliani
861f53dd97
Add query filter semantics guidance (#186)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate skill index and report schemas / validate-contract (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
2026-09-15 12:51:15 +02:00
waldo
b7617fb48a
knowledge(events): ChangeCompany leaves triggers and trigger-event subscribers running in the calling company (#152)
* knowledge(events): ChangeCompany leaves triggers and trigger-event subscribers running in the calling company

ChangeCompany redirects only the data access of a record variable; Learn states that triggers still run in the current company. The database trigger events are raised on every database operation and only pass RunTrigger to the subscriber, so Insert(false) after ChangeCompany still runs every subscriber in the calling company. Generated code either assumes the record 'becomes' a target-company record, or switches RunTrigger off and hand-copies the trigger logic, leaving the subscribers writing to the wrong company; none of the tested runs reached StartSession with the company parameter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* knowledge(events): qualify StartSession async semantics and fix concurrency-unsafe sample key

Addresses PR #152 review: StartSession is a fire-and-forget background
session (Ok reports only whether it started, not whether the codeunit
succeeded, and errors inside it do not propagate), so the Best Practice
now scopes the recommendation and calls out the durable status/error
channel a synchronous-success write needs. The good sample's
FindLast()+1 entry-number pattern raced under concurrent background
sessions; switched to AutoIncrement, which the platform guarantees is
unique across concurrent transactions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* knowledge(events): serialize the setup-counter increment; promote article and wire the review skill

PR #152 round 3 (JesperSchulz):
- The good sample's OnAfterInsertEvent subscriber still raced on the
  shared "Transfer Setup Good" singleton (Get/increment/Modify);
  AutoIncrement only protected the request key. Added
  TransferSetup.LockTable() before Get() to serialize concurrent
  background sessions.
- Promoted changecompany-runs-triggers-in-the-calling-company from
  community/knowledge/events/ to microsoft/knowledge/events/, and wired
  ChangeCompany/StartSession/RunTrigger tokens plus a targeted
  detection cue into microsoft/skills/review/al-events-review.md so a
  diff containing the anti-pattern reliably worklists this article,
  preserving the documented RunTrigger=false hand-off exception.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: waldo1001 <12088142+waldo1001@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-15 12:34:28 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
d24dc7b14b
Fix reporting skill index expectation (#185)
Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 10:45:35 +02:00
Stefano Demiliani
b545b22fb9
Add reporting review guidance and evaluation fixtures (#183)
* knowledge(performance): add job queue reliability guidance

* Address Job Queue review feedback

* Address Job Queue routing review feedback

* Encode job queue conflict in fixtures

* Add reporting review guidance and fixtures

* Fix reporting article reference
2026-09-15 10:38:32 +02:00
dayland
b74967bc5b
Add machine-readable review contracts (#182)
Generate a deterministic action-skill index from frontmatter, publish structural schemas for orchestration and findings, and validate flat review composition in CI.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: dayland <dayland@microsoft.com>
Copilot-Session: 76eb42c4-2acd-4f9c-a898-f4a44f9d46f7
2026-09-15 10:27:40 +02:00
dayland
852a676285
Fix Job Queue sample links (#184)
Use the required READ-convention Markdown links so knowledge retrieval can associate all new samples with their articles.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: dayland <dayland@microsoft.com>
Copilot-Session: 76eb42c4-2acd-4f9c-a898-f4a44f9d46f7
2026-09-15 09:32:40 +02:00
Stefano Demiliani
8c26ba4e76
Add Job Queue reliability and scheduling guidance (#148)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
* knowledge(performance): add job queue reliability guidance

* Address Job Queue review feedback

* Address Job Queue routing review feedback

* Encode job queue conflict in fixtures
2026-09-14 12:44:30 +02:00
Stefano Demiliani
45ac371e7a
Add AL-focused AppSource validation guidance (#142)
* knowledge(appsource): add AL validation guidance

* Address Marketplace review feedback

* Address remaining Marketplace review feedback

* Align AppSource review applicability outcome
2026-09-14 12:42:45 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
35d0966a8d
Normalize recoverable leaf finding ranges (#180)
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
* Normalize recoverable leaf ranges

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Run contract checks with review fixtures

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-11 15:24:20 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
51597068b1
Add bounded knowledge retrieval (#179)
* Add bounded knowledge retrieval

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 0d8b7764-f15a-49ea-8d50-d9147334f8af

* Fix bc-version overflow and pathless-row identity in bounded retrieval

Catalog matching compared an Int32 -BCVersion against a bigint range bound.
PowerShell coerces the right operand to the left operand's type, so a bound
wider than Int32 threw a conversion error and failed the whole domain catalog
rather than the single row. Metadata validation already accepts such bounds,
so compare as bigint on both sides.

The shared pager built its oversized-row message with $row.path, which
throws under Set-StrictMode -Version Latest when a row carries no path,
replacing the explicit bound failure with a property-lookup error. Resolve the
path defensively for dictionary and object rows so the offset-based fallback
is reachable.

Both paths gain regression coverage that fails without these fixes.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 0d8b7764-f15a-49ea-8d50-d9147334f8af
2026-09-11 12:35:31 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
c12b2f0a88
Separate analyzer rules from BCQuality knowledge (#178)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
Retire deterministic compiler and analyzer duplicates, remove their review routing, and clarify the admission test for contextual analyzer knowledge.

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-11 09:26:14 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
ac9e4fd9a2
Complete partner contribution and knowledge consumption guides (#176)
* Improve partner onboarding and documentation navigation

Lead with a complete plugin quick start and add task-oriented usage, troubleshooting, customization, and contribution guides. Preserve the broader plugin framing, correct conflicting contract guidance, support Agents folder reviews, and align repository validation. Convert existing sample references to clickable links without changing knowledge rules.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Complete partner contribution and knowledge consumption guides

Explain direct reading, supplied skills, and custom-agent consumption. Add a first-contribution walkthrough and concrete integration bootstrap, and clarify SetLoadFields guidance with authoritative sources and explicit review heuristics.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-11 09:09:53 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
2b5550c346
Improve partner onboarding and documentation navigation (#174)
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
Lead with a complete plugin quick start and add task-oriented usage, troubleshooting, customization, and contribution guides. Preserve the broader plugin framing, correct conflicting contract guidance, support Agents folder reviews, and align repository validation. Convert existing sample references to clickable links without changing knowledge rules.

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-09 17:31:03 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
a21edfec46
Frame app review as a plugin example (#173)
Remove historical naming and external orchestrator references, and present the app-folder review as one example of the broader host-native skill pattern.

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-09 17:07:11 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
17bb84a25e
Support standalone runners and complete app-folder reviews (#172)
* Document standalone review runner contract

Keep model selection and scheduling outside BCQuality while allowing orchestrators to run isolated review leaves concurrently with deterministic rollup semantics.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Support complete app folder reviews

Define folder-path as a current-state review scope and accept it across the standalone adapter, broad coordinator, and every AL review leaf.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add walk-up app review quick start

Put the complete app-folder installation and prompt flow directly in the README so partners can discover the standalone experience without reading integration details first.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Organize conceptual guides under docs

Move architecture and standalone runner documentation out of the repository root, add a documentation index, and update all inbound links.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-09 16:55:35 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
8584217c75
Clarify page field caption and tooltip inheritance (#160)
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
* Clarify page field caption and tooltip inheritance

Prevent redundant page-level properties by documenting inherited captions and BC24/runtime 13.0 table-field tooltips. Correct companion examples and version-scoped tooltip guidance.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Address tooltip quality and knowledge scope review feedback

Require useful, behavior-grounded tooltip text rather than caption repetition, improve the samples, and explain why compiler feedback does not prevent redundant page captions.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-07 15:13:35 +02:00
Wenjie Fan
1a5afdc0eb
Merge pull request #132 from microsoft/gggdttt-refine-self-improvement-guidance
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
Refine self-improvement review guidance
2026-09-03 15:42:39 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
4f0a13a801
Promote knowledge for Microsoft review skills (#153)
Move canonical knowledge for Microsoft-owned review domains into the Microsoft layer and document the skill/knowledge co-location policy.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Copilot-Session: 2a6ea875-d38e-4f30-aadb-0d606f9be231
2026-09-03 15:06:01 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
bca8f478d8
Simplify standalone AL code review skill (#150)
* Simplify standalone AL review skill

Rename the host-facing skill to al-code-review, reduce it to a thin Entry adapter, document the architecture, and validate host skill metadata.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: af96bb3d-893a-48a2-8298-c8f4271c162c

* Anchor plugin paths at PLUGIN_ROOT and restore the layer-filter caveat

The adapter delegated index preparation to Entry's Preparation step, but that
step is written for the clone model: it runs `pwsh ./tools/Build-KnowledgeIndex.ps1`
from the checkout root. A plugin host's working directory is the user's own
project, so the path does not resolve and the index is never built. Because
knowledge-index.json is gitignored, a fresh install has none, and READ silently
degrades to path-based discovery. The adapter now resolves Entry's repo-relative
paths against PLUGIN_ROOT and names the absolute index build; the generator
resolves its own root, so it indexes and writes the right tree from any cwd.

Entry also asserted that pruning has always happened before it runs, which is
false for an installation that ships the whole tree. Entry now scopes that
guarantee to consumers that actually prune, and the caveat dropped in the
rewrite - that enabled-layers narrows discovery rather than denying access - is
restored in the adapter and summarized in the README.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 0b67b90d-e4b4-4b92-9684-726c72c43b3f

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: af96bb3d-893a-48a2-8298-c8f4271c162c
Copilot-Session: 0b67b90d-e4b4-4b92-9684-726c72c43b3f
2026-09-03 10:25:44 +02:00
waldo
2439d5c412
knowledge(web-services): under schema 2.0 an API enum field is a contract by member name, under 1.0 by caption (#149)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
What an API page publishes for an enum field depends on the OData schema
version: member names under 2.0, the caption as Edm.String under 1.0, never
the ordinal. Custom APIs defaulted to 1.0 through BC 23 and to 2.0 from BC 24.
LLMs assert one carrier as universal and get one direction wrong.

Co-authored-by: waldo1001 <12088142+waldo1001@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-02 16:26:24 +02:00
Kilian Seizinger
82422f94c9
Avoid Public Event publisher (#144)
* Avoid Public Event publisher

* knowledge(events): scope public-publisher detection to same-app raisers

The detection rule flagged every public event publisher, including ones
deliberately public so a sibling app can raise them - a contract `internal`
cannot express across app boundaries. Scope the finding to publishers that
are public although only their own app raises them, and record the
cross-app case as a valid Best Practice option.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 0b67b90d-e4b4-4b92-9684-726c72c43b3f

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 0b67b90d-e4b4-4b92-9684-726c72c43b3f
2026-09-02 16:07:18 +02:00
Stefano Demiliani
53e2cf2fa4
Add community guidance and review support for Business Central agents (#137)
* feat(community/agents): add AL agent quality guidance

- add 20 agent knowledge rules with good and bad AL samples
- clarify setup dialog shape, temporary persistence, permissions, profiles, instructions, capability registration, and interface wiring
- add the community-owned AL agents review skill
- make review fixture discovery layer-aware with custom, community, and Microsoft precedence
- document layer-aware evaluation behavior

* fix(community/agents): align setup and permission samples

- mark agent setup pages as non-extensible where required
- narrow the agent profile by hiding an unrelated sales-order field
- define a dedicated read-only permission set for the sales review agent
- assign AL-defined permission sets with system scope and the owning app ID
- clarify the permission scope guidance for default access controls

* Address agent review feedback
2026-09-02 16:06:25 +02:00
Kilian Seizinger
182180913e
ShowMandatory + OnQueryClosePage Check (#147)
* ShowMandatory + OnQueryClosePage Check

* Tighten mandatory-field review guidance

Require explicit ShowMandatory in the good sample, acknowledge that NotBlank marking is unreliable, and limit findings to visible editable controls on paths where users must supply a value.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 89dba8c8-6529-4b60-956f-875a59be499d

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Copilot-Session: 89dba8c8-6529-4b60-956f-875a59be499d
2026-09-02 15:21:06 +02:00
Kilian Seizinger
7a41d25bbd
Process Context via manual event subscriber pattern (#145)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
* Process Context via manual event subscriber pattern

* improve knowledge article
2026-09-02 14:58:59 +02:00
António Silva
c39f723cae
Add community knowledge: AL boolean operators do not short-circuit (#136)
* Add community knowledge on AL boolean operators not short-circuiting

AL gives no short-circuit (lazy) evaluation guarantee for and/or/xor —
neither the AL operators nor the boolean operators documentation defines a
lazy evaluation order. LLMs trained on C#, JavaScript, or SQL assume the
left operand guards the right, which produces conditions where a guard
does not protect an unsafe subscript or a field read after a failed Get,
and where an expensive operand is paid on every path.

Adds community/knowledge/performance/boolean-operators-do-not-short-circuit.md
with good/bad AL companions. The guidance prefers nested if when one operand
depends on another, while keeping and/or legitimate for operands that are
independently safe and cheap, so a reviewer does not flag harmless bound
checks. This is the first article in a community performance domain; the
Microsoft performance review leaf skill already sources candidates by domain
across every enabled layer, so no skill change is needed to reach it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add case true of pattern for long condition chains

Follow-up from PR review: nested if is the right answer for two or three
dependent conditions, but past that the nesting becomes the problem. AL's
case statement is the flat alternative — the control statements
documentation states a value set "must be an expression or a range" and
that the first matching value set executes, so case true of / case false of
accept boolean expressions and stop at the first match. That is the
laziness the boolean operators do not provide.

Adds case-true-of-for-long-condition-chains.md with good/bad AL companions:
case false of for guard chains where every condition must hold, case true of
for first-match dispatch. The bad sample shows both failure shapes — a
five-level if ladder, and the worse escape of collapsing it into an and
chain, which trades nesting for a real defect.

Cross-links both articles, and adds the threshold to the short-circuit
article's Best Practice so following it does not lead to a deep ladder.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Comma-group the pure value sets in the case false of sample

Review feedback: the five value sets sharing exit(false) should be comma
separated. Applied to the three that are pure field reads with no order
dependency.

The Get and the Blocked read keep their own value sets. The documentation
guarantees that the first matching value set executes, which orders matching
across separate value sets; it says nothing about evaluation within one
comma-separated set, and the natural lowering of that is an equality-or
chain — where AL's or does not short-circuit. Grouping the Get with the
checks that must precede it would rest the sample's correctness on
undocumented behaviour, which is the defect these two articles exist to
prevent.

Encodes the boundary in the Best Practice section so the grouping is applied
where it is safe and not where it is not, and scopes the repeated-exit
detection signal explicitly to nested chains so the case sample does not read
as its own anti-pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Use a single exit(false) for the whole case false of chain

Review decision: all five conditions share one action, so they share one
comma-separated value set with a single exit(false).

Aligns the article's Best Practice with the sample — it previously told
authors to keep side-effecting conditions in their own value set, which the
sample no longer does — and drops the now-contradictory wording about listing
the failure action per condition.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Drop the parentheses from the case false of value sets

Applies NKarolak's review suggestion: a case value set needs no parentheses
around a comparison.

Encodes the rationale in the Best Practice section, since it is a real
advantage of the pattern and is not documented elsewhere in the repo. The AL
operator hierarchy places and/xor above the comparison operators and or just
above them too, so parentheses are mandatory in an and chain — A = B and
C = D misparses without them — while a case value set has no and to bind
tighter and needs none. That inverts the precedence most developers arrive
with from C#.

Also notes in the bad sample that its parentheses are not optional, so the
two samples contrast on parentheses as well as on evaluation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Address correctness review: or/xor pattern, case value-set ordering

Fixes two points from JesperSchulz's review on PR #136.

1. boolean-operators-do-not-short-circuit.md gave one fix — nested if — for
   and, or, and xor alike. That's only correct for and: nesting if A then if
   B then Action drops the A-true/B-false case of A or B, silently changing
   the result. Gives or its own early-exit pattern (if A then exit(true);
   exit(B)), warns explicitly against applying the and-rewrite to or, and
   clarifies that xor is not a short-circuit candidate in any language since
   its result always depends on both operands. Adds an or fixture
   (IsEligibleForFreeShipping) to both samples so an agent has a concrete
   pattern to match instead of extrapolating from the and-only examples.

2. case-true-of-for-long-condition-chains.md derived stop-at-first-match for
   one comma-separated value set from the documentation's guarantee about
   the first matching value set — plural, i.e. ordering across value sets,
   which is not the same claim. The good sample's Item.Get / Blocked pair
   depended on the one the docs don't make. Restructures the sample to only
   comma-group the three pure, order-independent checks; Get and Blocked
   keep their own value sets, in order, relying solely on the guarantee that
   is actually documented. Description and Anti Pattern now state that
   boundary so it isn't re-collapsed later.

Also carries forward a parenthesis fix (not Item.Blocked in the collapsed
bad sample) that was made two commits ago but never landed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-02 14:48:33 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
3e848d1ec2
knowledge(performance): align SetLoadFields placement with AL Guidelines (#130)
* knowledge(performance): align SetLoadFields placement with AL Guidelines (#120)

The AL Guidelines mark `SetLoadFields` placed before `SetRange`/`SetFilter`
as bad code and recommend filters first, while the BCQuality samples used
the opposite order — contradictory guidance across two Microsoft repos.

Per Learn (`Record.SetLoadFields`), "fields that are filtered upon are
always loaded", so the two orders produce an identical projection. The
upstream rule is a readability convention: keep `SetLoadFields` adjacent
to the read it governs.

- Reorder filters ahead of `SetLoadFields` in the six affected AL samples.
- State the placement convention in the Best Practice section.
- Record in Description that order does not change the projection, and
  that only a fieldless `SetLoadFields()` or a later overwriting call does.
- Add an Anti Pattern note so review agents treat the reverse order as a
  readability observation, never a performance defect.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Clarify partial-record projection changes

Document AddLoadFields, SetBaseLoadFields, and Reset alongside SetLoadFields so the statement-order guidance does not imply those APIs leave the projection unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 89dba8c8-6529-4b60-956f-875a59be499d

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 89dba8c8-6529-4b60-956f-875a59be499d
2026-09-02 14:44:09 +02:00
wenjiefan
c213f1495e Exempt optional notification handlers from the HandlerFunctions execution rule
The narrowed UI-handler guidance still stated the execution rule without the
qualifier the linked Microsoft reference uses. The article said every listed
handler must execute at least once, and the testing leaf skill asked for
`[HandlerFunctions(...)]` to match the invoked handlers exactly. The reference
says every *nonoptional* listed handler must execute, and that send-notification
and recall-notification handlers can be optional. As written, an agent could
flag a deliberately unused optional notification handler.

The discriminator is narrower than the handler type. Both
`[SendNotificationHandler([HandlerIsOptional: Boolean])]` and
`[RecallNotificationHandler([HandlerIsOptional: Boolean])]` take an explicit
optionality argument, so `[SendNotificationHandler(true)]` is exempt while the
same attribute written without the argument stays nonoptional like every other
handler type. Keying the exemption on the argument rather than the type keeps it
checkable from the diff and avoids the opposite false positive, where an agent
stops flagging genuinely nonoptional notification handlers.

Changes:

- The article now states the nonoptional qualifier, explains that optionality is
  declared rather than inferred, and adds an explicit do-not-flag clause. That
  clause also forbids proposing removal, because the listed entry is what keeps
  the test passing on the runs where the notification does fire.
- The testing leaf skill carries the same boundary in its `ui-handlers-in-tests`
  cue, and its mechanical-fix list no longer allows removing a listed optional
  notification handler as a one-click suggestion.
- `SendNotificationHandler` and `RecallNotificationHandler` were missing from the
  skill's testing token list, so notification handlers were not reliably
  surfaced to the relevance step at all. Both are now listed.
- The good sample gains a test that lists an unreached
  `[SendNotificationHandler(true)]`; the bad sample gains the mirror image, an
  unreached `[SendNotificationHandler]` with no optionality argument. The pair
  differs only by that argument, which is the point.
- `evaluation/review-fixtures.json` pins the testing domain to
  `ui-handlers-in-tests` so the boundary is exercised: the good sample is the
  clean control at `minimumCleanRate` 1.0 and the bad sample is the expected
  finding. Keywords were retagged with `notification` and `optional-handler`.

validate_frontmatter.py reports 0 errors; Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1 passes with
32 cases across 16 leaf domains and resolves the testing fixture to this article.
2026-09-02 11:46:13 +02:00
Wenjie Fan
35a7e72f12
knowledge: three false-positive guards from BCApps PR 10277, 10278 and 10346 (#146)
data-modeling: add insert-only-transfer-may-rely-on-caller-cleanup. A filter-and-insert transfer routine was reported for stale rows and duplicate keys even though the field OnValidate trigger calls a sibling cleanup procedure that clears the same range immediately before it. Deciding this requires reading the caller, so the article asks reviewers to trace call sites and keeps uncleared or mismatched-filter paths reportable.

appsource: scope two-level-namespace-replaces-object-affix-not-extension-member-affix to apps that actually configure a mandatory affix. AS0011 only runs when AppSourceCop is enabled with a mandatory affix; a first-party in-box app that ships no such configuration is not subject to it. The member-affix requirement itself is unchanged for apps that do configure one.

testing: allow permission-tests-must-lower-the-execution-context to accept a composed role. The article demanded the exact permission set under test be assigned directly, so a test that lowered permissions through a role including that set and then asserted WritePermission was false was reported as a coverage gap. What matters is the effective context plus a boundary assertion, not which object the test names.

Co-authored-by: wenjiefan <wenjiefan@microsoft.com>
2026-09-02 11:25:19 +02:00
Wael
f027e28f83
knowledge: improve review precision from BCApps PR 10080 feedback (#128)
* knowledge: improve review precision from BCApps PR 10080 feedback

* Update microsoft/knowledge/appsource/object-affixes-prevent-collisions.md

Co-authored-by: Natalie Karolak, MVP <34504100+NKarolak@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <JesperSchulz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Natalie Karolak, MVP <34504100+NKarolak@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-02 11:16:30 +02:00
wenjiefan
5016962b40 Align the IsHandled article slug, keywords and good sample with its narrowed scope
The article was rewritten to say a reset is required only when the value can
carry over, and its H1 was updated to match, but three artefacts still carried
the old "always initialize to false" premise:

- The slug still read `initialize-ishandled-to-false-before-publishing`, which
  contradicts the body. The slug is not cosmetic: Build-KnowledgeIndex.ps1
  ranks candidates on keywords, frontmatter dimensions, domain, path and title,
  so a stale path pushes selection back toward the behaviour this change
  narrows. Renamed to `reset-ishandled-only-when-the-value-can-carry-over`,
  following the existing precedent for conditional slugs such as
  `unreleased-symbol-change-is-not-a-breaking-change`.
- Keywords still listed `initialization` and `deterministic` and omitted
  `false-positive`, the tag this repository uses for suppression articles.
  Replaced with `carry-over` and `loop-iteration` and added `false-positive`.
- The good sample demonstrated only the "prefer separate fresh locals" clause
  and contained no reset at all, so the article's headline case had no positive
  example. It was also asymmetric with the bad sample, which gained a loop
  procedure showing a local that carries `true` into the next iteration.

Added the matching loop procedure to the good sample: a local declared outside
the loop is reset at the top of each iteration. That case cannot be solved by
introducing another local, because AL has no block scope, so it is the only
shape that demonstrates the reset the article still requires. It also gives the
engine the correct `suggested-code` shape for the loop finding; without it the
one-click fix adapted from the good sample would propose splitting the variable
rather than adding one line.

Also renamed the sample codeunits from "IsHandled Init ..." to
"IsHandled Carry Over ...", and updated the two references to the old slug:
the events leaf skill cue and the events pin in evaluation/review-fixtures.json.

validate_frontmatter.py reports 0 errors; Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1 passes with
32 cases across 16 leaf domains and resolves the events fixture to the renamed
article.
2026-09-02 11:08:16 +02:00
Wenjie Fan
00c9307483
knowledge(breaking-changes): adding a parameter to an event publisher is not a signature break (#139)
* knowledge(breaking-changes): exclude appended event parameters from the signature-change rule

The article's detection guidance flags 'a parameter added' on any shipped procedure. Applied to an event publisher that is bound to rather than called, this produced a false positive on BCApps PR 10278, where a trailing var parameter was appended to the existing IntegrationEvent OnAfterOpenForRecRef and the developer twice replied that adding a parameter to an existing integration event is not a breaking change.

It also contradicted events/add-new-event-parameters-at-the-end, which already states that existing subscribers still bind to the leading parameters. Scope the rule to called procedures, carve out appended event parameters as additive, and keep every other event signature edit - removal, reorder, retype, var flip - in scope. Point the IsHandled case at events/do-not-add-ishandled-to-an-existing-event, which owns that semantic concern.

* fix: event parameter additions are additive at any position, not only when appended

The first revision justified the carve-out with leading-prefix binding and limited it to parameters appended at the end. Verified against shipping BCApps code that AL binds subscriber parameters by name, not position, so an added parameter is additive wherever it is placed. Also corrects the cross-reference to events/adding-a-parameter-to-an-event-is-not-a-breaking-change, which already states this rule, and drops reordering from the list of edits that break binding.

* Route event signature edits to the analyzer-backed events article

Address review feedback: name AS0025, AS0063 and AS0077 for the var and rename cases instead of claiming them in the breaking-changes article, and point at events/treat-local-and-internal-events-as-subscriber-contracts which already owns them.

---------

Co-authored-by: wenjiefan <wenjiefan@microsoft.com>
2026-09-02 09:24:54 +02:00