bcquality/microsoft/skills/review
Jesper Schulz-Wedde f91fc1602f Generalize the self-review pass framing
Drop the specific pattern checklist (architecture-level smells, error-
handling gaps, magic constants, privacy/telemetry surface, resource
lifecycle - with concrete code patterns under each). It baked case-
study findings into the skill contract and aged badly. Replace with a
domain-level framing: walk by the domains the sub-skills already cover
(performance, security, privacy, style, upgrade, UI) plus the cross-
cutting concerns (architecture, error handling, resource lifecycle).
The domains are anchors for completeness, not a script.

The structural rule - do an explicit self-review pass after the leaves
- is what carries the value. The content of the pass belongs in the
agent's general AL judgement and in the knowledge layer.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-28 11:04:38 +02:00
..
al-code-review.md Generalize the self-review pass framing 2026-05-28 11:04:38 +02:00
al-performance-review.md Strengthen al-code-review execution, propagate suggested-code to leaves, two new KB articles 2026-05-28 10:48:32 +02:00
al-privacy-review.md Strengthen al-code-review execution, propagate suggested-code to leaves, two new KB articles 2026-05-28 10:48:32 +02:00
al-security-review.md Strengthen al-code-review execution, propagate suggested-code to leaves, two new KB articles 2026-05-28 10:48:32 +02:00
al-style-review.md Strengthen al-code-review execution, propagate suggested-code to leaves, two new KB articles 2026-05-28 10:48:32 +02:00
al-ui-review.md Strengthen al-code-review execution, propagate suggested-code to leaves, two new KB articles 2026-05-28 10:48:32 +02:00
al-upgrade-review.md Strengthen al-code-review execution, propagate suggested-code to leaves, two new KB articles 2026-05-28 10:48:32 +02:00