bcquality/community/knowledge/performance
Jeremy Vyska d45068969a Correct SetLoadFields JIT-load article to match MS docs
The draft claimed accessing an unlisted field "reloads the entire row"
per record. Microsoft's partial-records docs say otherwise: the platform
does an implicit Get that loads the missing field(s), and in a direct var
loop the first JIT updates the enumerator so later iterations do not
re-load. The genuine per-row penalty is the pass-by-value case, where the
copy's enumerator is not updated.

Rewrite the article around JIT loading and the by-value footgun, rename
the slug from ...full-reload to ...jit-load, and fix the good/bad samples
to demonstrate the by-value repetition accurately.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:21:28 +02:00
..
deleteall-skips-ondelete-unless-runtrigger.bad.al Add 15 community knowledge articles from BC Code Intel ingest 2026-07-01 11:02:48 +02:00
deleteall-skips-ondelete-unless-runtrigger.good.al Add 15 community knowledge articles from BC Code Intel ingest 2026-07-01 11:02:48 +02:00
deleteall-skips-ondelete-unless-runtrigger.md Add 15 community knowledge articles from BC Code Intel ingest 2026-07-01 11:02:48 +02:00
setloadfields-unlisted-field-triggers-jit-load.bad.al Correct SetLoadFields JIT-load article to match MS docs 2026-07-01 11:21:28 +02:00
setloadfields-unlisted-field-triggers-jit-load.good.al Correct SetLoadFields JIT-load article to match MS docs 2026-07-01 11:21:28 +02:00
setloadfields-unlisted-field-triggers-jit-load.md Correct SetLoadFields JIT-load article to match MS docs 2026-07-01 11:21:28 +02:00