mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
186d8a1314
* Complete AL review knowledge readiness Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Generalize review fixture discovery Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Preserve published field IDs in sample Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Clarify published field identity rules State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 * Align field obsoletion sample baselines Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27 --------- Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bcquality-al-review | ||
| do.md | ||
| entry.md | ||
| read.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| write.md | ||
BCQuality global skills
This folder contains the skills that are not owned by any single layer. There are two kinds:
- The entry-point skill — the first skill an agent invokes at runtime.
- The three meta-skill contracts — stable references that define what the rest of BCQuality means.
The entry-point skill
| File | Role |
|---|---|
entry.md |
ENTRY — Given a task context, returns a dispatch record naming the action skill(s) to invoke. The agent's first call when pointed at BCQuality. |
Routing logic lives in Entry, not in the orchestrator. An agent that knows only "invoke /skills/entry.md first" has enough to drive the rest of the repo.
The meta-skill contracts
| # | File | Role | Who reads it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | read.md |
READ — Schema + Use. How to read a knowledge file: frontmatter fields, section semantics, matching rules, layer precedence, conflict resolution. | Any agent or action skill that consumes knowledge files. |
| 2 | do.md |
DO — Action Skill contract. The Source → Relevance → Worklist → Action template and the structured output every action skill produces. Includes super-skill composition. | Any agent invoking an action skill; every action-skill author. |
| 3 | write.md |
WRITE — New Knowledge. Authoring rules for knowledge files. Defers to read.md for the schema. |
Contributors (human or agent) adding or editing knowledge files. Not used during consumption. |
READ and DO are read on demand — typically by the first action skill the agent executes after dispatch. They are not prerequisites for invoking Entry. WRITE is only used when scaffolding new content.
These contracts are stable. Changes require a PR approved by both maintainers.
For the end-to-end flow — from orchestrator trigger through to findings integration — see ../agent-consumption.md. For the high-level project framing, see ../README.md.