mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
9214f73819
Online-eval data shows the style leaf is the largest source of dismissed findings. Two causes: - Mechanical, analyzer-enforced conventions (this-keyword AA0248, label suffixes AA0074, missing ToolTip, label scope) fire at gating severity and duplicate what CodeCop/AppSourceCop already report. Calibrate them to info so a severity-gating consumer drops the redundant noise. - Correctness/logic/data-integrity defects get reframed as style conventions and emitted here. Sharpen the scope boundary: such defects belong to the relevant domain leaf, or to al-code-review's cross-cutting agent channel when no knowledge file covers them, never to this leaf. Co-authored-by: wenjiefan <wenjiefan@microsoft.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| al-breaking-changes-review.md | ||
| al-code-review.md | ||
| al-error-handling-review.md | ||
| al-events-review.md | ||
| al-interfaces-review.md | ||
| al-performance-review.md | ||
| al-privacy-review.md | ||
| al-security-review.md | ||
| al-style-review.md | ||
| al-ui-review.md | ||
| al-upgrade-review.md | ||
| al-web-services-review.md | ||