bcquality/evaluation
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 186d8a1314
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
Complete AL review knowledge readiness (#108)
* Complete AL review knowledge readiness

Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Generalize review fixture discovery

Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Preserve published field IDs in sample

Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Clarify published field identity rules

State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Align field obsoletion sample baselines

Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
2026-07-15 10:55:25 +02:00
..
README.md Complete AL review knowledge readiness (#108) 2026-07-15 10:55:25 +02:00
review-fixtures.json Complete AL review knowledge readiness (#108) 2026-07-15 10:55:25 +02:00

AL review evaluation

The evaluation is convention-driven. For every microsoft/skills/review/al-<domain>-review.md leaf, the harness finds microsoft/knowledge/<domain>/, selects the first article (by filename) with both .bad.al and .good.al companions, and derives the expected positive and clean control automatically. Adding a conforming leaf requires no scoring-contract edit.

review-fixtures.json contains only global thresholds and optional exceptional overrides. An override may select a different article or add context when the generic convention cannot express a scenario. It should remain empty in the normal case.

Model-facing preparation hashes case IDs, neutralizes Good/Bad object-name tokens, and removes full-line sample comments so neither the article slug, domain, nor expected outcome reveals the answer.

Validate the corpus

pwsh ./tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1 -Root .

This credential-free check proves every registered leaf maps to a same-named knowledge domain with at least one complete AL sample pair and that all configured overrides are valid.

Run a fast-model evaluation

  1. Prepare neutral inputs:

    pwsh ./tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1 -Root . -PrepareDirectory ./.evaluation-run
    

    This is also the CI path. It derives all cases, builds the current index, requires the convention-selected article to rank naturally into the candidate cutoff, and prepares the neutral requests.

  2. For a fast/small model, use one fresh invocation per request-case-*.json. Each request embeds the exact leaf instructions, that domain's candidate index rows with authoritative paths, and one opaque case. The model opens only matching articles and copies finding IDs from candidateArticles[].path. Save each response with the matching result-case-*.json name in the same directory.

    request-<domain>.json files provide optional two-case leaf batches; save those as result-<domain>.json. Directory scoring prefers result-case-*.json when present and otherwise falls back to result-*.json. review-request.json is an optional all-domains stress test for larger models. Neither batch form is the preferred fast-model profile.

  3. Save only this result shape:

    {
      "cases": [
        {
          "id": "case-a1b2c3d4",
          "findings": [
            { "id": "microsoft/knowledge/appsource/object-affixes-prevent-collisions.md" }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
    

    Include every case. A clean control has an empty findings array.

  4. Score all per-leaf results together:

    pwsh ./tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1 -Root . -ResultsDirectory ./.evaluation-run
    

    For a single combined stress-test result, use -ResultsPath instead.

The committed gate requires full expected recall, the exact convention-derived article ID, and no findings on clean controls.