mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-10-05 22:56:55 +01:00
c2e15986ce
The blanket burden-of-proof wording rejected any finding whose applicability was not affirmatively demonstrable in the diff. Findings about consequences that scale with data volume or codebase size cannot meet that bar by nature, so performance and style findings were rejected wholesale. Narrow the rejection-on-doubt rule to the project-wide premises it was written for (packaging model, deployment target, tenancy, release state) and restore keep-on-ambiguity as the default elsewhere. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: e33a7b96-4821-4797-9f72-96880f3c6412 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| al-appsource-review.md | ||
| al-breaking-changes-review.md | ||
| al-code-review.md | ||
| al-data-modeling-review.md | ||
| al-error-handling-review.md | ||
| al-events-review.md | ||
| al-interfaces-review.md | ||
| al-performance-review.md | ||
| al-privacy-review.md | ||
| al-query-review.md | ||
| al-security-review.md | ||
| al-style-review.md | ||
| al-telemetry-review.md | ||
| al-testing-review.md | ||
| al-ui-review.md | ||
| al-upgrade-review.md | ||
| al-web-services-review.md | ||