Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
62dabf9a11 Co-locate AL samples next to their knowledge articles
The /samples/ top-level tree is replaced with sibling files in each
knowledge-layer folder. An article and its demonstrations now live
side-by-side:

  microsoft/knowledge/<domain>/<slug>.md
  microsoft/knowledge/<domain>/<slug>.good.al
  microsoft/knowledge/<domain>/<slug>.bad.al

Rationale:
- Proximity. An article and its paired samples are one unit; the
  filesystem now reflects that.
- Layer ownership. Samples inherit layer precedence for free -- a
  /custom/ fork can override an article and its samples atomically,
  which the shared /samples/ tree previously made awkward.
- Trivial migration path. Action-skill source globs
  (*/knowledge/<domain>/**/*.md) are unchanged; sample discovery is a
  sibling-filename lookup.

Changes:
- git mv of all 65 sample files from samples/<domain>/<slug>/{bad,good}.al
  to microsoft/knowledge/<domain>/<slug>.{bad,good}.al (history preserved).
- Update See-sample references in all 37 articles that ship samples.
- skills/read.md: replace the no-code-blocks bullet with a pointer to a
  new Sample files section that fully specifies the sibling convention,
  the kinds (good/bad + forward-compatible), multi-technology rules,
  demonstration-only status, and layer-precedence behaviour.
- skills/write.md: update the samples pointer to match.
- README.md: annotate the knowledge tree with the sample sibling shape.
- samples/README.md deleted; content lifted into skills/read.md.
- Both generators (C:\temp\gen_performance_knowledge.py,
  C:\temp\gen_security_knowledge.py) updated to emit at the new paths
  and to stop writing samples/README.md. Re-running them is idempotent
  against the committed layout.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-17 13:45:33 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
5aaa58e8ee Introduce super-skill composition; refactor al-code-review into super + two leaves
DO contract (skills/do.md)
- New 'sub-skills' optional frontmatter field on action skills: when
  present and non-empty, the skill is a super-skill that composes
  other action skills.
- New 'Composition (super-skills)' section covering section
  interpretation, outcome rollup, summary aggregation, and suppression
  scope.
- Output schema gains three optional fields: 'from-sub-skill' on each
  finding, top-level 'sub-results[]' carrying nested findings-reports,
  and top-level 'skipped-sub-skills[]'.
- Super-skills MUST NOT filter sub-skills by task content; leaves own
  task-level applicability and signal via outcome.
- Findings from a failed sub-skill MUST NOT flow into the parent's
  findings[] or counts, consistent with DO's rule that consumers
  ignore a failed skill's findings. Reports are still preserved in
  sub-results[] for traceability.
- Rolled-up non-citation finding ids MUST be prefixed with the sub-
  skill id to prevent collisions across sub-skills. Citation-based
  ids are already unique via repo path and are not rewritten.
- Outcome rollup rules updated: 'partial' covers S = {partial},
  {partial, partial}, and {partial, failed}. Empty worklist rolls up
  to 'not-applicable' with outcome-reason.
- Nested super-skills are not permitted in v1.

Reference skills (microsoft/skills/)
- al-code-review.md rewritten as the canonical super-skill: lists
  al-performance-review and al-security-review as sub-skills, orch-
  estrates invocation, aggregates output, and includes a worked
  rolled-up JSON example plus the empty-corpus rollup.
- al-performance-review.md added as a leaf reference skill for the
  performance knowledge domain.
- al-security-review.md added as a leaf reference skill for the
  security knowledge domain.
- Both leaves retain the leaf-level rules validated in the prior
  pass: partial-context message requirement, worklist-scoped
  suppression, application-area semantics, and the platform-guarantee
  threshold for blocker severity.

README updated to describe leaf vs super-skill and link all three
reference skills.

Two rubber-duck passes tightened the contract and caught schema
violations in the worked examples before commit.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-17 13:06:03 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
7ad0c03c4d Add al-code-review as the canonical DO reference implementation
- microsoft/skills/al-code-review.md: full action skill reviewing AL
  source changes. Exercises every part of the DO contract:
  - frontmatter with all required action-skill fields and the four
    optional knowledge filters
  - all five required sections (Source, Relevance, Worklist, Action,
    Output) in order
  - applicability-based filtering with READ's partial-context rule,
    including the requirement to name unknown dimensions in the
    finding message
  - conflict resolution and suppression scoped to worklist candidates
  - full outcome taxonomy handled (completed, no-knowledge,
    not-applicable, partial, failed), including the current empty-
    corpus state
  - worked JSON output example showing structured references,
    per-finding confidence, and a suppression entry

- README.md: link the skill as the canonical reference so skill
  authors have a starting point.

Two rubber-duck passes caught and fixed contract precision issues
before commit: location.line/range consistency, partial-context
message requirement, over-broad suppression scope, application-area
matching semantics, and the blocker severity threshold.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-17 12:53:21 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
6dbfebc0cf Add the three meta-skills: READ, DO, WRITE
- skills/read.md (READ, Schema + Use) — knowledge-file contract:
  frontmatter schema, required/optional sections (normative vs
  non-normative), layer precedence with applicability-based conflict
  detection, explicit frontmatter matching semantics (including
  partial-context handling).

- skills/do.md (DO, Action Skill) — action-skill template:
  frontmatter schema, required sections, four-step pattern
  (Source -> Relevance -> Worklist -> Action), and the output contract
  as a JSON schema with outcome, findings, structured references,
  confidence, and mandatory suppression recording. Includes a worked
  example.

- skills/write.md (WRITE, New Knowledge) — authoring guide:
  atomicity, size, section guidance, field-by-field choices, file
  naming, layer choice, pre-PR checklist. Defers to READ for the
  format spec.

- README.md — link the three files from the meta-skills section and
  update the output-contract paragraph to include outcome and
  suppressed.

- agent-consumption.md — update step 5 (Agent emits structured output)
  to match the richer DO contract.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-17 12:40:08 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
0cc48defd5 Add documentation on agent consumption flow and architecture 2026-04-17 09:44:24 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
2d07fc5138 Refine README.md: clarify authoring rules for knowledge files and update code example guidelines 2026-04-17 06:05:30 +02:00
Jesper Schulz-Wedde
d444f5bd72 Add initial project structure with .gitignore, LICENSE, README, and CODEOWNERS 2026-04-17 05:56:10 +02:00