mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
3 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
822cae1b27
|
Own the knowledge-index generator + index-aware review skills (#25)
* Make domain-skill knowledge discovery index-aware The 6 AL domain review skills and read.md now enumerate candidate articles from the BCQuality knowledge index (knowledge-index.json) instead of opening every file under the domain folder to read its frontmatter. The worklist selection predicate is unchanged (keywords intersect diff tokens, or topic matches a changed object type) - only the discovery source changes, so the same articles are selected. Full article bodies are read only for worklisted entries. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Reconcile §Source wording with the lean knowledge index The BCQuality filter now emits a lean index whose per-article description is a one-line hint rather than the full verbatim Description. Update the six domain skills' §Source to say the index carries a one-line description hint (keywords, title, and a one-line description) instead of the full description. The worklist selection predicate is unchanged: keywords drive selection and the agent opens worklisted articles in full for their rule bodies. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Own the knowledge-index generator in BCQuality The knowledge index is an acceleration of the skills' Source step, and its schema is part of that contract — so BCQuality should own the generator rather than each consumer re-implementing it. Add tools/Build-KnowledgeIndex.ps1 (the parser + lean-description shaping + emit, lifted verbatim from the BCAppsBCQuality filter prototype) and document the index in agent-consumption.md. Consumers prune their clone to policy, then call this script; the index stays in lockstep with the Source contract and every orchestrator gets the same faithful index for free. The worklist selection predicate is unchanged. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Own knowledge-index generation in BCQuality (runtime + CI), not the consumer The index is now produced by BCQuality itself: Entry's preparation step rebuilds knowledge-index.json over the live, already-pruned clone at the start of every run, and a new CI workflow validates the generator's health (determinism, full coverage, selection-input integrity). Consumers no longer invoke or know about the index. Rebuilding over the pruned clone (vs shipping a committed full-corpus index) keeps the index exact for any consumer policy: it can never list a denied article, so policy-excluded rules cannot leak into discovery. READ now states the index is discovery-only -- a finding must cite an article opened in full, and rows whose file is absent are discarded before ranking. - skills/entry.md: new 'Preparation -- knowledge index' precondition - skills/read.md: index ownership + discovery-only invariant - microsoft/skills/review/*.md (6): 'BCQuality builds' (not 'the filter emits') - agent-consumption.md 5a: runtime+CI ownership rationale - .github/workflows/knowledge-index.yml + scripts/Test-KnowledgeIndex.ps1: generator guard - .gitignore: never commit the runtime index Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Make runtime index build non-interactive and self-contained entry.md now gives the exact build command (pwsh ./tools/Build-KnowledgeIndex.ps1) so the agent's preparation step is unambiguous, and the generator's -BCQualityRoot parameter is optional (defaults to the clone root) so it runs in non-interactive -p mode without prompting. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * Resolve knowledge-index root to absolute path (cross-platform fix) Get-ChildItem.FullName is always absolute, so deriving the relative article path via Substring(\.Length) requires an absolute root. A relative root such as '.' (used by the CI guard's 'Test-KnowledgeIndex.ps1 -Root .') left the full path almost intact on Linux, producing bogus 'home/runner/.../knowledge' paths and failing the coverage check. Normalise both the generator's -BCQualityRoot and the test's -Root with Resolve-Path before use. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com> |
||
|
|
287c041844 |
Expand review skills to match the 6-domain knowledge corpus
The knowledge corpus now covers performance, security, privacy, upgrade, style, and UI. Previously only two leaf reviewer skills existed (al-performance-review, al-security-review), so four of the six domains had knowledge with no skill sourcing from them. A community reader landing in privacy/, upgrade/, style/, or ui/ would see articles with no apparent consumer. Three changes: 1. Move existing review skills into `microsoft/skills/review/`. The `review/` subfolder groups all review-kind skills together and leaves room for future non-review action skills at the `microsoft/skills/` level. Updates references in README.md, agent-consumption.md, and skills/entry.md to the new paths. 2. Add four new leaf reviewer skills — al-privacy-review, al-upgrade-review, al-style-review, al-ui-review — each following the same DO template as al-performance-review/al-security-review but sourcing from the corresponding knowledge domain. al-upgrade-review and al-ui-review return `not-applicable` when the diff contains no upgrade surface or no page files, respectively. 3. Update al-code-review to compose all six leaf skills and retarget the dangling references in every populated JSON example (`use-setloadfields.md`, `no-plaintext-secrets-in-telemetry.md`, `avoid-implicit-commit.md` — none of which exist in the corpus) to real knowledge files: `call-setloadfields-before-filters.md`, `use-secrettext-for-credentials.md`, `never-hardcode-secrets-in-al.md`. Validator passes with 0 errors / 0 warnings. |
||
|
|
aa243a93ec |
Introduce the entry-point skill (skills/entry.md)
Add a new skill kind, 'entry-point', and its sole instance at skills/entry.md. When an orchestrator points an agent at BCQuality, the agent's first call is Entry: it receives a task context and returns a dispatch record naming the action skill(s) to invoke. Routing logic lives in Entry, not in the orchestrator. Entry structurally follows DO's Source -> Relevance -> Worklist -> Action pattern but the units it selects are action skills (not knowledge files) and its output is a dispatch record (not a findings-report). Contract highlights: - Inputs semantics in DO clarified as any-of: orchestrator supplies whichever listed input types it has; skill must return 'not-applicable' if the subset is insufficient. This matches the existing al-* canonical skills which declare [pr-diff, file-path] as alternatives. - Relevance admits candidates whose inputs intersect inputs-available, not whose inputs are a subset. - Dispatched inputs are the intersection, not the full inputs-available set, to avoid leakage between skills. - Super-skill precedence in Worklist supersedes a sub-skill only when the goal is a broader match for the super than the sub. When the goal specifically names a concern the sub handles (e.g., 'performance review'), the sub wins and the super is dropped with reason 'narrower-sub-skill-selected'. - Skill layer precedence is defined here as custom > community > microsoft, matching READ's rule for knowledge files. - skipped[] carries 'superseded-by' for layer-precedence, sub-skill, and super-skill drops, for traceability. Propagate the concept through: - skills/README.md: distinguish the runtime entry-point skill from the three meta-skill contracts. - skills/do.md: acknowledge entry-point alongside meta-skills as the only kinds that live outside a layer. - README.md: rewrite the Skills and Agent bootstrapping sections so the bootstrap instruction is 'invoke /skills/entry.md first'. - agent-consumption.md: update the Mermaid flow and step narrative to show Entry dispatch, with READ and DO read on demand. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> |