Address review guidance feedback

Preserve independent event seams, cover loop-carried handled state, strengthen checkpoint and UI-handler fixtures, and align DeleteAll fallback guidance.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 10646e50-2d8b-4cca-b02b-dfa78629e6a1

microsoft/skills/review/al-events-review.md

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ When the post-conflict worklist is empty because no applicable events knowledge
 
 The following targeted checks map diff signals to specific `events` articles. Treat each as a candidate-selection cue: when the signal appears in the changed code, add the named article to the worklist and evaluate it in Action.
 
-- An `IsHandled` value that can carry over as `true` (reused after an earlier raise, input/global/field, or otherwise seeded) is passed to another publisher without a reset — `initialize-ishandled-to-false-before-publishing`. Do not match a single raise using a fresh local Boolean, or a later raise reached only after `if IsHandled then exit;`.
+- An `IsHandled` value that can carry over as `true` (reused after an earlier raise, re-entered on a later loop iteration, input/global/field, or otherwise seeded) is passed to a publisher without a reset — `initialize-ishandled-to-false-before-publishing`. Do not match one non-looping raise using a fresh local Boolean, or a later raise reached only after a semantically valid `if IsHandled then exit;` proves the value is false.
 - `if IsHandled then exit;` in a routine that also raises a paired `OnAfter…` event later, so the after-event is skipped whenever the call is handled — `preserve-onafter-execution-when-ishandled-skips-the-body`.
 - Any parameter added to a public Business/Integration event procedure, regardless of position; do not flag additions or reordering on `local`/`internal` publishers merely because a new parameter was not appended — `add-new-event-parameters-at-the-end`.
 - A shipped Business/Integration event renamed or removed, or an existing parameter renamed, removed, retyped, or changed to/from `var`, based on the mistaken assumption that `local` or `internal` prevents dependent subscription; parameter order alone is not a subscriber-contract violation — `treat-local-and-internal-events-as-subscriber-contracts`.

microsoft/skills/review/al-testing-review.md

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Set `confidence` to:
 
 After evaluating each worklist entry, also consider whether the diff exhibits a testing defect the agent recognises from its general AL knowledge that no knowledge file in the worklist covers. Such candidates are agent findings within this skill's domain — emit them with `references: []`, an `id` slug prefixed with `agent:`, `confidence` capped at `medium`, `severity` capped at `minor` (agent findings are advisory and non-gating), and a `message` that is self-contained (describing both the issue and a concrete recommendation, since there is no knowledge-file footer for the consumer to fall back on). Hold every candidate to the precision bar in `skills/do.md` (*Agent findings*): emit only a concrete, material testing defect a knowledgeable BC reviewer would agree is wrong — steelman it first and drop anything stylistic, speculative, dependent on code outside the diff, or merely a valid alternative; when in doubt, omit. The scope is strictly AL testing; defects outside this domain belong to other leaves and MUST NOT be emitted here. Before emitting, check the worklist for a knowledge file that matches the candidate — if one exists, upgrade the candidate to a knowledge-backed finding instead. See `skills/do.md` for the full contract.
 
-For every emitted finding, decide whether the fix is mechanical. A fix is mechanical when it is small, local, and unambiguous from the diff context (for example: add the matching `ExpectedError` assertion after `asserterror`; add or remove a handler name in `HandlerFunctions`; add `LibraryVariableStorage.Clear` or `AssertEmpty`; or replace hand-rolled fixture creation with an evident library call). For mechanical findings, emit `findings[].suggested-code` with the literal replacement for the source lines indicated by `location`. The payload must be a verbatim replacement — no diff markers, no fences, no commentary — that the consumer can render as a one-click suggestion. When a `.good.al` companion exists and the diff context matches the `.bad.al` shape, adapt the `.good.al` replacement into `suggested-code`.
+For every emitted finding, decide whether the fix is mechanical. A fix is mechanical when it is small, local, and unambiguous from the diff context (for example: add the matching `ExpectedError` assertion after `asserterror`; add or remove a handler name in `HandlerFunctions`; add `LibraryVariableStorage.Clear` or `AssertEmpty` when queue/LVS intentionally verifies interaction order, count, text, replies, or a scripted sequence; or replace hand-rolled fixture creation with an evident library call). For mechanical findings, emit `findings[].suggested-code` with the literal replacement for the source lines indicated by `location`. The payload must be a verbatim replacement — no diff markers, no fences, no commentary — that the consumer can render as a one-click suggestion. When a `.good.al` companion exists and the diff context matches the `.bad.al` shape, adapt the `.good.al` replacement into `suggested-code`.
 
 Omit `suggested-code` only when the appropriate fix depends on context the skill cannot determine, when multiple defensible replacements exist, or when the fix spans non-contiguous code. If a finding is mechanical-looking but you omit `suggested-code`, set `findings[].suggested-code-omission-reason` to a short explanation. See `skills/do.md` for the full contract.