Custom-laget bestaar nu begge CI-checks: 72 validator-fejl -> 0

Normalisering af alle 39 custom knowledge-filer til READ-kontraktens
skema (validate_frontmatter.py + Test-KnowledgeIndex.ps1 begge groenne):

- R01/R02: 28 filer manglede frontmatter eller brugte aeldre skemaer
  (title/category/severity/rule-id m.fl.) - alle har nu praecis de 6
  kraevede noegler; keywords haandskrevet pr. fil da de driver
  worklist-selektionen i INDEX/knowledge-index
- R09: manglende Description-sektion - regel-agtige foersteoverskrifter
  (Core Rule/Rule/Regel/Core Principle) omdoebt, eller sektion indsat
  efter titlen hvor intro-tekst fandtes
- R10: fenced code blocks konverteret til 4-space indrykkede blokke
  i alle filer (indhold uaendret)
- R11: 4 filer over 100 linjer fortaettet redaktionelt uden semantisk
  tab (ai-eval-scores 143->100, git-lifecycle 121->97,
  permission-sets 113->99, test-feature-scenario-tags 105->91)
- R05: AL0197->al0197, add_repo->add-repo; keyword-lister trimmet
  til maks 10

Ingen regler er fjernet eller aendret i betydning - kun form.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Dieringer 2026-07-01 23:47:31 +02:00
parent ec2892f0ab
commit dd5637b1db
39 changed files with 729 additions and 814 deletions

View file

@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
---
bc-version: [all]
domain: architecture
keywords: [permission-set, least-privilege, tiers, security]
technologies: [al]
countries: [w1]
application-area: [all]
---
# CURABIS Architecture: Permission Sets Must Follow Least-Privilege Hierarchy
## Core Rule
## Description
Permission sets in CURABIS apps must be structured in access tiers following the least-privilege principle. Tiers must be **additive** — each tier includes the one below it via `IncludedPermissionSets`. No single permission set should bundle user-level and administrative access in a flat structure.
@ -19,87 +27,69 @@ Permission sets in CURABIS apps must be structured in access tiers following the
## Implementation Pattern
```al
permissionset 50100 "PM365 - View"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = true;
Caption = 'Project Mgmt 365 - View';
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Project" = R,
tabledata "PM Project Task" = R,
page "PM Project List" = X,
page "PM Project Card" = X;
}
permissionset 50100 "PM365 - View"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = true;
Caption = 'Project Mgmt 365 - View';
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Project" = R,
page "PM Project List" = X;
}
permissionset 50101 "PM365 - Edit"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = true;
Caption = 'Project Mgmt 365 - Edit';
IncludedPermissionSets = "PM365 - View";
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Project" = RIMD,
tabledata "PM Project Task" = RIMD,
codeunit "PM Project Management" = X;
}
permissionset 50101 "PM365 - Edit"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = true;
Caption = 'Project Mgmt 365 - Edit';
IncludedPermissionSets = "PM365 - View";
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Project" = RIMD,
tabledata "PM Project Task" = RIMD,
codeunit "PM Project Management" = X;
}
permissionset 50102 "PM365 - Admin"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = false;
Caption = 'Project Mgmt 365 - Admin';
IncludedPermissionSets = "PM365 - Edit";
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Setup" = RIMD,
page "PM Setup" = X;
}
```
permissionset 50102 "PM365 - Admin"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = false;
Caption = 'Project Mgmt 365 - Admin';
IncludedPermissionSets = "PM365 - Edit";
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Setup" = RIMD,
page "PM Setup" = X;
}
## Relationship to CURABIS-ARCH-011
This rule is a **companion to CURABIS-ARCH-011** (`exposed-objects-must-be-in-a-permission-set`):
- **CURABIS-ARCH-011**: Every exposed object *must exist* in at least one permission set
- **This rule**: Permission sets *themselves* must follow the hierarchical least-privilege structure
Both must be satisfied simultaneously: it is not enough that objects appear in a permission set if that set grants excessive access.
Companion to **CURABIS-ARCH-011** (`exposed-objects-must-be-in-a-permission-set`):
ARCH-011 requires every exposed object to *exist* in a permission set; this rule
requires the sets *themselves* to follow the tiered least-privilege structure.
Both must hold — objects in a set that grants excessive access is not enough.
## Anti-Pattern
```al
// Violation: flat "full access" set bundles user and admin access
permissionset 50100 "PM365 - Full Access"
{
Assignable = true;
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Project" = RIMD,
tabledata "PM Setup" = RIMD, // admin data mixed with user data
tabledata "PM Project Task" = RIMD,
codeunit "PM Post Codeunit" = X;
}
```
// Violation: flat "full access" set bundles user and admin access
permissionset 50100 "PM365 - Full Access"
{
Assignable = true;
Permissions =
tabledata "PM Project" = RIMD,
tabledata "PM Setup" = RIMD, // admin data mixed with user data
tabledata "PM Project Task" = RIMD,
codeunit "PM Post Codeunit" = X;
}
## BCApps Reference
BCApps Business Foundation defines exactly this tiered pattern:
```al
// BusFoundEdit.PermissionSet.al
permissionset 4 "Bus. Found. - Edit"
{
Access = Public;
Assignable = true;
Caption = 'Business Foundation - Edit';
IncludedPermissionSets = "Bus. Found. - View";
}
```
Microsoft uses Admin, Edit, View, Obj, and Read tiers with `IncludedPermissionSets` throughout BCApps — never a single flat "full access" set.
BCApps Business Foundation defines exactly this tiered pattern: Microsoft uses
Admin, Edit, View, Obj, and Read tiers with `IncludedPermissionSets` throughout —
never a single flat "full access" set. Each tier inherits from the tier below;
Admin sets use `Assignable = false` to prevent accidental assignment to regular
users.
- **Source:** https://github.com/microsoft/BCApps/tree/main/src/Business%20Foundation/App/Permissions
- **Files:** `BusFoundAdmin`, `BusFoundEdit`, `BusFoundView`, `BusFoundObj`, `BusFoundRead`
- **Pattern:** Each tier inherits from the tier below via `IncludedPermissionSets`. Admin sets use `Assignable = false` to prevent accidental assignment to regular users.
## Verification