Address Jesper Schulz-Wedde's review on PR #159

- transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.md: the "Commit
  causes an error" behavior is specific to an explicitly declared
  AutoRollback attribute. A test method with no TransactionModel
  attribute at all is a distinct, valid shape — BCApps' own
  codeunit 134915 "ERM Online Mapping Setup" commits inside a lazy
  Initialize() with no attribute declared, cleaning up via a manual
  asserterror at the end. Evidence for commit-shared-test-fixture-
  inside-lazy-initialize.md (this PR), which is correct as submitted.
- confirm-needs-strsubstno-before-confirmhandler-sees-substituted-text.md:
  reframe as a known, unconfirmed-fix platform defect
  (microsoft/ALAppExtensions#23935) rather than designed behavior; add
  the Message/MessageHandler asymmetry as supporting evidence.
- table-relation-test-exclude-known-invalid-relations-via-event.md:
  note the test-app-only consumer dependency; correct "walks every
  TableRelation field property in the app" to the actual tenant-wide
  Table Relations Metadata scope across installed apps.
- Wire confirm-needs-strsubstno, commit-shared-test-fixture-inside-
  lazy-initialize, and table-relation-test-exclude-known-invalid-
  relations-via-event into al-testing-review.md's candidate-selection
  cues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

microsoft/knowledge/testing/table-relation-test-exclude-known-invalid-relations-via-event.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ application-area: [all]
 
 ## Description
 
-Codeunit 134926 "Table Relation Test" walks every `TableRelation` field property in the app and fails the moment a related field's type or length doesn't match what the relation requires — the related field must match the largest related field's length, and its type must match (except a field may relate to both `Code` and `Text`, which resolves to `Text`). A field with a legitimate, intentional relation shape has no per-field override in its own object definition; the check runs across the whole app with no built-in escape hatch.
+Codeunit 134926 "Table Relation Test" (shipped in BCApps' test app — only consumers that depend on the BC test libraries can subscribe to it) reads Table Relations Metadata tenant-wide across every installed app, not just the current one, and fails the moment a related field's type or length doesn't match what the relation requires — the related field must match the largest related field's length, and its type must match (except a field may relate to both `Code` and `Text`, which resolves to `Text`). A field with a legitimate, intentional relation shape has no per-field override in its own object definition; the check runs with no built-in escape hatch.
 
 ## Best Practice