Microsoft/bcquality
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git synced 2026-10-05 06:36:55 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Separate analyzer rules from BCQuality knowledge (#178)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Details
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Details
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run
Details

Browse source 
Retire deterministic compiler and analyzer duplicates, remove their review routing, and clarify the admission test for contextual analyzer knowledge.

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 2026-09-11 09:26:14 +02:00 • committed by GitHub
parent ac9e4fd9a2
commit c12b2f0a88
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
60 changed files with 45 additions and 1095 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/using-bcquality.md
View file

@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ removal or another comparison-only regression requires an actual baseline.
The corpus is technical AL guidance, not exhaustive functional validation or
AppSource certification.
BCQuality intentionally does not duplicate mechanical diagnostics already
enforced by the AL compiler or standard analyzers. Run the consuming app's
normal compiler and analyzer pipeline alongside review and authoring. Knowledge
may still discuss a diagnostic when BC-specific context is needed to avoid a
false positive or choose a correct remediation.
### Knowledge by domain
Each article describes one concern. Where samples exist, use its linked