Separate analyzer rules from BCQuality knowledge (#178)
Some checks are pending
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Waiting to run
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Waiting to run
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Waiting to run

Retire deterministic compiler and analyzer duplicates, remove their review routing, and clarify the admission test for contextual analyzer knowledge.

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 2026-09-11 09:26:14 +02:00 • committed by GitHub
parent ac9e4fd9a2
commit c12b2f0a88
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
60 changed files with 45 additions and 1095 deletions

View file

@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ capable LLM **would get something wrong, or miss something, without it**, not
simply because the topic is important. Apply this admission test:
> If this file did not exist, would a modern LLM reviewing or generating BC
> code make a mistake this file would have prevented?
> code make a BC-specific mistake that the configured compiler, analyzers, and
> tests would not reliably catch, or would it misinterpret or incorrectly
> remediate one of their diagnostics?
Good candidates encode a BC-specific mechanic that models get wrong, a
version-dependent behavior, or a misleading interpretation of an analyzer
@ -56,6 +58,15 @@ transactions short" does not earn a separate knowledge file merely by being
sound advice. Negative clarifications that prevent false positives are as
valuable as rules that catch defects.
Do not add knowledge whose anti-pattern is fully and deterministically detected
by the AL compiler or a standard analyzer. This applies to authoring as well as
review: an authoring agent should compile with the consuming app's actual
ruleset and correct the resulting diagnostics instead of carrying prose copies
of analyzer rules in context. Analyzer-related knowledge belongs here only when
it adds a BC-specific exception, version boundary, cross-object implication, or
remediation constraint that the diagnostic itself cannot establish. Merely
explaining why a deterministic rule exists is not sufficient.
**Skills hold discovery and execution mechanics; knowledge files hold BC
facts.** Correct or extend a knowledge article when a BC fact is missing or
wrong. Do not hide that fact in a skill's instructions. A genuine routing,