Scope tableextension requirement to Normal fields lacking a classification

The requirement to declare DataClassification explicitly in a tableextension
applies to the Normal fields it adds; FlowFields and FlowFilters are
SystemMetadata automatically and are covered by their own article. Being
added by a table extension is also not itself a finding - the finding is a
Normal field added by a table extension that has no valid explicit
DataClassification.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
wenjiefan 2026-08-17 15:25:14 +02:00
parent f8acb6cbdd
commit c1057d38b2
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ See sample: `table-level-data-classification-cascades.good.al`.
## Anti Pattern
Reporting every Normal field without an explicit `DataClassification` when its own table already supplies a valid default, or requiring redundant field-level declarations that repeat the table value. The mirror-image mistake is waving through an unclassified Normal field added by a `tableextension` because the base table carries a default — a table extension inherits nothing. A real issue exists when neither scope supplies a valid classification, when a field's data requires an override of the inherited value, or when the field is added by a table extension.
Reporting every Normal field without an explicit `DataClassification` when its own table already supplies a valid default, or requiring redundant field-level declarations that repeat the table value. The mirror-image mistake is waving through an unclassified Normal field added by a `tableextension` because the base table carries a default — a table extension inherits nothing. A real issue exists when neither scope supplies a valid classification, when a field's data requires an override of the inherited value, or when a Normal field added by a `tableextension` lacks a valid explicit `DataClassification`.