mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
Regenerate microsoft/knowledge from upstream BCApps instructions
The previous LLM-generated knowledge files contained factual
hallucinations. The most visible was the claim that `FindFirst` /
`FindLast` "forces a full-table scan" on an unfiltered record - it does
not; those APIs return a single row via the current key.
Other inaccuracies the audit found and fixed:
* `FindSet(true)` was described as "taking a LockTable". The correct
upstream phrasing is that `FindSet(true)` sets
`ReadIsolation::UpdLock` on the read. UpdLock and LockTable are
related but distinct mechanisms.
* The list of production-scale tables had been invented beyond the
upstream source (e.g. "Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry") without a
citation. The regenerated list matches the ten tables upstream lists
with their P95 row counts.
* `SetLoadFields` guidance had been augmented with an extra mechanism
claim ("the database resolves the filter using the index without
hydrating the value") not present in upstream.
Approach: full regeneration of `microsoft/knowledge/` from the six
upstream BCApps Code Review instruction files, with Microsoft Learn /
the AL language reference as a secondary source. Every claim in every
regenerated file is anchored to a verbatim upstream quote (or a Learn
URL); the audit trail lives in artifacts/trace-<domain>.json on the
session workspace.
The PR #11 transaction/error-handling cluster is preserved verbatim:
* performance/understand-implicit-transaction-boundary.md
* performance/codeunit-run-as-atomic-sub-operation.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/codeunit-run-requires-prior-commit-inside-transaction.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/use-tryfunction-for-error-catching-not-rollback.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/avoid-commit-inside-loops.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* security/commitbehavior-attribute-scopes-explicit-commits.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* testing/transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.{md,good.al,bad.al}
These articles already cite Microsoft Learn and were carefully
cross-referenced; the regeneration skips their topics rather than
duplicating them.
File counts after regeneration:
performance 35 .md (5 preserved + 30 new)
privacy 17 .md
security 18 .md (1 preserved + 17 new)
style 33 .md
testing 1 .md (preserved)
ui 19 .md
upgrade 18 .md
Total 141 atomic knowledge files, each strictly one rule. All pass
.github/scripts/validate_frontmatter.py with 0 errors and 0 warnings.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
613c4b4019
commit
a9f3c50863
562 changed files with 6293 additions and 4869 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
bc-version: [all]
|
||||
domain: upgrade
|
||||
keywords: [dataversion, first-install, on-install-app-per-company, moduleinfo, zero-version]
|
||||
technologies: [al]
|
||||
countries: [w1]
|
||||
application-area: [all]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Detect first install with `DataVersion() = Version.Create('0.0.0.0')`
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
On the first install of an extension on a tenant the platform records a zero data version: `AppInfo.DataVersion()` returns `Version.Create('0.0.0.0')`. Subsequent upgrades record the actual previous version. The `OnInstallAppPerCompany` trigger uses this distinction to detect a brand-new install — for example, to seed default rows that should not be re-inserted on a normal upgrade. This is the one place where reading `DataVersion()` is the right tool; for everything else, use an upgrade tag.
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practice
|
||||
|
||||
In `OnInstallAppPerCompany`, fetch the current `ModuleInfo` via `NavApp.GetCurrentModuleInfo`, compare `AppInfo.DataVersion()` to `Version.Create('0.0.0.0')`, and run install-only seed logic only when they match. On any non-zero data version, exit immediately — that path is an upgrade, not an install.
|
||||
|
||||
See sample: `first-install-dataversion-zero-check.good.al`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
Treating `OnInstallAppPerCompany` as if it always implies "fresh tenant". The trigger also fires when reinstalling over an existing data set; without the `0.0.0.0` guard, install-only seed code re-runs on every upgrade and duplicates rows.
|
||||
|
||||
See sample: `first-install-dataversion-zero-check.bad.al`.
|
||||
|
||||
## See also
|
||||
|
||||
- `use-upgrade-tags-not-version-checks.md` — for upgrade steps after first install, use upgrade tags rather than `DataVersion`.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue