Regenerate microsoft/knowledge from upstream BCApps instructions

The previous LLM-generated knowledge files contained factual
hallucinations. The most visible was the claim that `FindFirst` /
`FindLast` "forces a full-table scan" on an unfiltered record - it does
not; those APIs return a single row via the current key.

Other inaccuracies the audit found and fixed:

* `FindSet(true)` was described as "taking a LockTable". The correct
  upstream phrasing is that `FindSet(true)` sets
  `ReadIsolation::UpdLock` on the read. UpdLock and LockTable are
  related but distinct mechanisms.
* The list of production-scale tables had been invented beyond the
  upstream source (e.g. "Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry") without a
  citation. The regenerated list matches the ten tables upstream lists
  with their P95 row counts.
* `SetLoadFields` guidance had been augmented with an extra mechanism
  claim ("the database resolves the filter using the index without
  hydrating the value") not present in upstream.

Approach: full regeneration of `microsoft/knowledge/` from the six
upstream BCApps Code Review instruction files, with Microsoft Learn /
the AL language reference as a secondary source. Every claim in every
regenerated file is anchored to a verbatim upstream quote (or a Learn
URL); the audit trail lives in artifacts/trace-<domain>.json on the
session workspace.

The PR #11 transaction/error-handling cluster is preserved verbatim:

* performance/understand-implicit-transaction-boundary.md
* performance/codeunit-run-as-atomic-sub-operation.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/codeunit-run-requires-prior-commit-inside-transaction.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/use-tryfunction-for-error-catching-not-rollback.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/avoid-commit-inside-loops.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* security/commitbehavior-attribute-scopes-explicit-commits.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* testing/transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.{md,good.al,bad.al}

These articles already cite Microsoft Learn and were carefully
cross-referenced; the regeneration skips their topics rather than
duplicating them.

File counts after regeneration:

  performance   35 .md  (5 preserved + 30 new)
  privacy       17 .md
  security      18 .md  (1 preserved + 17 new)
  style         33 .md
  testing        1 .md  (preserved)
  ui            19 .md
  upgrade       18 .md

Total 141 atomic knowledge files, each strictly one rule. All pass
.github/scripts/validate_frontmatter.py with 0 errors and 0 warnings.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

microsoft/knowledge/style/error-passes-parameters-directly-not-strsubstno.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+bc-version: [all]
+domain: style
+keywords: [error, strsubstno, label, parameters, concatenation, aa0231]
+technologies: [al]
+countries: [w1]
+application-area: [all]
+---
+
+# Pass parameters directly to `Error()`, do not wrap with `StrSubstNo`
+
+## Description
+
+`Error()` accepts a format string and a variable number of arguments — `Error(SomeLabelErr, Arg1, Arg2)`. The platform performs the substitution itself, which is the path the translation pipeline understands. Wrapping the same call as `Error(StrSubstNo(SomeLabelErr, Arg1, Arg2))` hides the placeholders from the platform and removes the format-string identity from the call-site, so analyzers cannot match the call to its label and translators lose the link between the formatted message and its template. The corresponding anti-pattern for hardcoded strings — `Error('Customer ' + CustomerNo + ' not found')` — is even worse: it builds an untranslatable, unanalyzable string at runtime.
+
+## Best Practice
+
+Declare a `Label` with the `Err` suffix and the appropriate `Comment` for placeholders, then call `Error(YourErr, arg1, arg2)`. The same rule applies to `Message`, `Confirm`, and other UI primitives: format string in, parameters as separate arguments, no `StrSubstNo` wrapper at the call site, no string concatenation. An `Error('')` (empty message) is acceptable when the calling code expects another layer to emit the actual diagnostic.
+
+See sample: `error-passes-parameters-directly-not-strsubstno.good.al`.
+
+## Anti Pattern
+
+`Error(StrSubstNo(CustomerNotFoundErr, CustomerNo))` and `Error(CustomerNotFoundErr + ': ' + CustomerNo)` both defeat the translation and analysis machinery. Reviewers should treat `StrSubstNo` appearing as an argument to `Error`, `Message`, `Confirm`, or `StrMenu` as an unconditional signal to rewrite.
+
+See sample: `error-passes-parameters-directly-not-strsubstno.bad.al`.