Microsoft/bcquality
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git synced 2026-08-06 17:36:53 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Regenerate microsoft/knowledge from upstream BCApps instructions

Browse source 
The previous LLM-generated knowledge files contained factual
hallucinations. The most visible was the claim that `FindFirst` /
`FindLast` "forces a full-table scan" on an unfiltered record - it does
not; those APIs return a single row via the current key.

Other inaccuracies the audit found and fixed:

* `FindSet(true)` was described as "taking a LockTable". The correct
  upstream phrasing is that `FindSet(true)` sets
  `ReadIsolation::UpdLock` on the read. UpdLock and LockTable are
  related but distinct mechanisms.
* The list of production-scale tables had been invented beyond the
  upstream source (e.g. "Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry") without a
  citation. The regenerated list matches the ten tables upstream lists
  with their P95 row counts.
* `SetLoadFields` guidance had been augmented with an extra mechanism
  claim ("the database resolves the filter using the index without
  hydrating the value") not present in upstream.

Approach: full regeneration of `microsoft/knowledge/` from the six
upstream BCApps Code Review instruction files, with Microsoft Learn /
the AL language reference as a secondary source. Every claim in every
regenerated file is anchored to a verbatim upstream quote (or a Learn
URL); the audit trail lives in artifacts/trace-<domain>.json on the
session workspace.

The PR #11 transaction/error-handling cluster is preserved verbatim:

* performance/understand-implicit-transaction-boundary.md
* performance/codeunit-run-as-atomic-sub-operation.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/codeunit-run-requires-prior-commit-inside-transaction.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/use-tryfunction-for-error-catching-not-rollback.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* performance/avoid-commit-inside-loops.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* security/commitbehavior-attribute-scopes-explicit-commits.{md,good.al,bad.al}
* testing/transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.{md,good.al,bad.al}

These articles already cite Microsoft Learn and were carefully
cross-referenced; the regeneration skips their topics rather than
duplicating them.

File counts after regeneration:

  performance   35 .md  (5 preserved + 30 new)
  privacy       17 .md
  security      18 .md  (1 preserved + 17 new)
  style         33 .md
  testing        1 .md  (preserved)
  ui            19 .md
  upgrade       18 .md

Total 141 atomic knowledge files, each strictly one rule. All pass
.github/scripts/validate_frontmatter.py with 0 errors and 0 warnings.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 2026-05-21 09:53:09 +02:00
parent 613c4b4019
commit a9f3c50863
562 changed files with 6293 additions and 4869 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
microsoft/knowledge/performance/singleton-setup-tables-need-no-access-optimization.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
---
bc-version: [all]
domain: performance
keywords: [singleton, setup-table, sales-receivables-setup, general-ledger-setup, setloadfields, bounded]
technologies: [al]
countries: [w1]
application-area: [all]
---
# Singleton setup tables hold one row; access-pattern optimization is wasted
## Description
Business Central setup tables — `Sales & Receivables Setup`, `General Ledger Setup`, `FA Setup`, `Purchases & Payables Setup`, and the broader pattern of any `*Setup` table — hold at most one record per company. Per the upstream guidance, "any access pattern is fine, no `SetLoadFields` needed" on these tables. The same applies to other small bounded tables (enum mappings, permission objects, Role IDs) and system metadata tables (`TableMetadata`, `Field`, `AllObjWithCaption`) where iteration is safe.
## Best Practice
Skip access-pattern optimization on singleton-setup-style tables. `SalesReceivablesSetup.Get()` does not need `SetLoadFields` (see `use-setloadfields-for-partial-records.md`); a `repeat ... until` over a permission-object table does not need bulk operations. Spend the review attention on the production-scale tables instead (see `production-scale-tables-warrant-extra-analysis.md`).
## Anti Pattern
Mechanically applying the rules in this domain to every `Record` variable in the codebase. Flagging "missing `SetLoadFields`" on `GeneralLedgerSetup` or "use `IsEmpty` instead of `FindSet`" on a setup table adds noise without payoff — the optimization saves nothing measurable on a one-row table — and trains readers to ignore the review channel.