Microsoft/bcquality
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git synced 2026-08-09 02:41:37 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Move false-positive guards from skills into knowledge files

Browse source 
Keep review skills slim (finders/appliers). The FP guards and released-baseline preconditions previously embedded in leaf skills become negative-clarification knowledge articles in their domains, and the agent-findings policy edits to al-ui/al-privacy are reverted to main. Adds 6 knowledge files: error-handling (page-boolean-triggers-default-to-true), ui (bound-page-field-inherits-source-field-tooltip), performance (calcfields-in-both-getrecord-triggers-is-not-redundant, page-effective-filter-may-live-outside-the-diff), breaking-changes (unreleased-symbol-change-is-not-a-breaking-change), upgrade (unreleased-schema-change-needs-no-upgrade-path).
This commit is contained in:
wenjiefan 2026-07-17 09:58:16 +02:00
parent ff03c52783
commit 9cc5627f42
12 changed files with 142 additions and 15 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
microsoft/skills/review/al-error-handling-review.md
View file

@ -73,8 +73,6 @@ Set `confidence` to:
After evaluating each worklist entry, also consider whether the diff exhibits an error-handling defect the agent recognises from its general AL knowledge that no knowledge file in the worklist covers. Such candidates are agent findings within this skill's domain — emit them with `references: []`, an `id` slug prefixed with `agent:`, `confidence` capped at `medium`, `severity` capped at `minor` (agent findings are advisory and non-gating), and a `message` that is self-contained (describing both the issue and a concrete recommendation, since there is no knowledge-file footer for the consumer to fall back on). Hold every candidate to the precision bar in `skills/do.md` (*Agent findings*): emit only a concrete, material error-handling defect a knowledgeable BC reviewer would agree is wrong — steelman it first and drop anything stylistic, speculative, dependent on code outside the diff, or merely a valid alternative; when in doubt, omit. The scope is strictly error handling; defects outside this domain belong to other leaves and MUST NOT be emitted here. Before emitting, check the worklist for a knowledge file that matches the candidate — if one exists, upgrade the candidate to a knowledge-backed finding instead. See `skills/do.md` for the full contract.
**Known false-positive — do not emit.** The Boolean page triggers `OnInsertRecord`, `OnModifyRecord`, `OnDeleteRecord`, and `OnQueryClosePage` return `true` by default; omitting an explicit return value lets the operation proceed. Only an explicit `exit(false)` (or a path that returns `false`) cancels it. Do not claim a missing `exit(true)` prevents inserts, modifies, or deletes.
For every emitted finding, decide whether the fix is mechanical. A fix is mechanical when it is small, local, and unambiguous from the diff context (for example: replace a string-concatenated `Error` with a Label-backed call; mark an internal-only failure `ErrorType::Internal`; add a missing `DetailedMessage`). For mechanical findings, emit `findings[].suggested-code` with the literal replacement for the source lines indicated by `location`. The payload must be a verbatim replacement — no diff markers, no fences, no commentary — that the consumer can render as a one-click suggestion. When a `.good.al` companion exists and the diff context matches the `.bad.al` shape, adapt the `.good.al` replacement into `suggested-code`.
Omit `suggested-code` only when the appropriate fix depends on context the skill cannot determine, when multiple defensible replacements exist, or when the fix spans non-contiguous code. If a finding is mechanical-looking but you omit `suggested-code`, set `findings[].suggested-code-omission-reason` to a short explanation. See `skills/do.md` for the full contract.