mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-10-05 22:56:55 +01:00
Organize conceptual guides under docs
Move architecture and standalone runner documentation out of the repository root, add a documentation index, and update all inbound links. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e92a1dc833
commit
7212e921ee
5 changed files with 18 additions and 7 deletions
10
README.md
10
README.md
|
|
@ -129,8 +129,9 @@ lives at `microsoft/skills/review/al-code-review.md`.
|
|||
|
||||
Partners that want model selection, parallel leaf execution, retries, or usage
|
||||
telemetry can add a thin runner outside BCQuality. See
|
||||
[Build a lightweight standalone review runner](standalone-runner.md) for the
|
||||
integration contract and a minimal implementation checklist.
|
||||
[Build a lightweight standalone review runner](docs/standalone-runner.md) for the
|
||||
integration contract and a minimal implementation checklist. Architecture and
|
||||
partner guides are collected in the [documentation index](docs/README.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Knowledge file format
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -177,16 +178,17 @@ Action skills follow a four-step pattern:
|
|||
|
||||
Every action skill produces output in a common format that orchestrators can consume without skill-specific parsing. The format is JSON and includes an `outcome` (so a clean run, a not-applicable skill, and a partial failure are all distinguishable), `findings` (what the skill observed), structured `references` back to the knowledge files that informed each finding, per-finding `confidence`, and a `suppressed` list recording any knowledge files overridden by layer precedence. This contract is defined in the Action Skill meta-skill so that orchestrators and action skills remain independently evolvable.
|
||||
|
||||
BCQuality is an **additive** knowledge layer: it augments the agent's review judgement, it does not replace it. Super-skills (such as `al-code-review`) run a self-review pass alongside their sub-skills and surface concerns the agent identified on its own, marked with `from-sub-skill: "agent"` and an empty `references: []` so consumers can render them distinctly from knowledge-backed findings. See [agent-consumption.md](agent-consumption.md) and [`skills/do.md`](skills/do.md) for the full contract.
|
||||
BCQuality is an **additive** knowledge layer: it augments the agent's review judgement, it does not replace it. Super-skills (such as `al-code-review`) run a self-review pass alongside their sub-skills and surface concerns the agent identified on its own, marked with `from-sub-skill: "agent"` and an empty `references: []` so consumers can render them distinctly from knowledge-backed findings. See [How agents consume BCQuality](docs/agent-consumption.md) and [`skills/do.md`](skills/do.md) for the full contract.
|
||||
|
||||
The meta-skills in `/skills/` define this pattern. Every concrete action skill follows it.
|
||||
|
||||
For the end-to-end flow — from orchestrator trigger through to how output reaches developers — see [agent-consumption.md](agent-consumption.md).
|
||||
For the end-to-end flow — from orchestrator trigger through to how output reaches developers — see [How agents consume BCQuality](docs/agent-consumption.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
├── /skills/ # Global: entry-point skill + meta-skill contracts (READ, DO, WRITE)
|
||||
├── /docs/ # Architecture and partner integration guides
|
||||
├── /evaluation/ # Neutral good/bad review fixtures and scoring contract
|
||||
├── /.github/ # Actions and workflows
|
||||
├── /microsoft/ # Microsoft-endorsed layer
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue