RegelSanity: Retten faar jurisdiktion og en foged

Michaels observation: udviklere tilfoejer agenter lokalt i enkelt-repos
(Edison opstod saadan) - og repoer maa ikke opfoere sig forskelligt.
Francis (Bacon) observerer og Immanuel (Kant) universaliserer, men ingen
haandhaevede ensartethed paa tvaers af portefoeljen. Tre byggesten:

- Ny regel repo-local-agents-must-be-universalized-or-removed: lokale
  agenter/kvalitetsregler har to fremtider - universaliseres via
  Francis/Immanuel/Michael eller fjernes. Aldrig tavs beholdelse.
  Domaeneviden hoerer i projectmemory/docs; kvalitetsstandarder i
  BCQuality eller ingen steder.
- Mode B v11: reconciliation kigger nu BEGGE veje - ekstra filer i
  .github/.agents (ikke i template-tabellen) flages med a/b-valg:
  universaliser eller fjern. Det var fogeden, der manglede: Edison
  laa uopdaget lokalt, fordi Mode B kun tjekkede manglende filer.
- court.agent.md v2: to sagstyper. Effektivitets-sager kraever Edison-
  scorecards som hidtil; RegelSanity-sager (lokal divergens) kraever
  kun filen, gabet den udfylder, og spoergsmaalet universel-eller-ud.
  Disposition: UNIVERSALIZE eller REMOVE.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

custom/agents/court.agent.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 kind: action-skill
 id: curabis-bcquality-court
-version: 1
+version: 2
 title: The Court — CURABIS BCQuality Landsret
 description: >
   The three-judge appellate court for BCQuality governance. Convenes Lincoln,
@@ -65,7 +65,11 @@ Each judge reads all prior opinions before writing their own.
 
 ## Convening the Court
 
-The Court is convened by presenting a **case brief** containing:
+The Court hears two kinds of cases, with different brief requirements.
+
+### Effectiveness cases (rulebook health)
+
+Convened by presenting a **case brief** containing:
 
 1. **The question before the Court** — what strategic decision needs a ruling?
    (e.g., "Should rules ARCH-003 and ARCH-007 be consolidated?",
@@ -74,6 +78,23 @@ The Court is convened by presenting a **case brief** containing:
 3. **The relevant rules** — full text from BCQuality
 4. **Incident history** — any documented cases where the rules failed or succeeded
 
+### RegelSanity cases (local divergence)
+
+CURABIS repos must behave identically (BCQuality rule
+`repo-local-agents-must-be-universalized-or-removed`). When Mode B or a session
+finds a repo-local agent or quality rule that exists in no other repo, the
+Court hears the divergence case. **No Edison scorecards are required** — the
+brief is:
+
+1. **The local file** — full text, and which repo carries it
+2. **The gap it fills** — why did a developer feel the need to create it?
+3. **The question** — universalize into BCQuality, or remove from the repo?
+
+The disposition for a RegelSanity case is always one of **UNIVERSALIZE**
+(route to Francis → Immanuel → Michael) or **REMOVE**. A local agent that is
+good enough to keep is by definition good enough to universalize — Edison
+himself entered the rulebook exactly this way.
+
 The Court will not deliberate without a case brief. Vague questions produce
 vague rulings.