Microsoft/bcquality
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git synced 2026-10-07 15:46:55 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Add bounded knowledge retrieval

Browse source 
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 0d8b7764-f15a-49ea-8d50-d9147334f8af
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 2026-09-11 11:46:01 +02:00
parent c12b2f0a88
commit 6a89831c5c
26 changed files with 1852 additions and 55 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
microsoft/skills/review/al-data-modeling-review.md
View file

@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ An orchestrator invokes this skill with a `pr-diff`, `file-path`, or `folder-pat
## Source
Read the BCQuality knowledge index once — the `knowledge-index.json` BCQuality builds at the root of the knowledge checkout (Entry's preparation step regenerates it over the live, already-filtered clone — see `skills/entry.md`). It lists every article that survived layer and allow/deny filtering and carries, per article, its `path`, `layer`, `domain`, frontmatter dimensions, `keywords`, `title`, and a one-line `description` hint — exactly the fields Relevance and Worklist consume. Take the index entries whose `domain` is `data-modeling` as this skill's candidate set across every enabled layer; do not open the individual article files at this step. Open an article's full body only once it enters the Worklist below, so a review reads the index plus the handful of worklisted articles instead of every file under `*/knowledge/data-modeling/**`.
Use READ's **Bounded retrieval for review skills** workflow with `-Domain data-modeling`. Consume every catalog page across enabled layers before applying this leaf's Relevance and Worklist; preserve each exact catalog path and open complete bodies only for exact paths selected by the Worklist. If the helper or prepared index is unavailable or invalid, use READ's explicit path-discovery and bounded native-read fallback.
## Relevance