Microsoft/bcquality
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git synced 2026-10-07 07:36:54 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4

Fix remaining correctness issues from Jesper's 2026-09-15 re-review

Browse source 
- commit-shared-test-fixture-inside-lazy-initialize: three sub-issues.
  Recommended TestIsolation = Codeunit instead of listing Disabled as an
  equal option - Disabled never rolls back at all ("tests are not
  isolated from each other" per the property's own docs), so a fixture
  this pattern commits under Disabled is permanent database
  contamination unless something else tears it down; Disabled is now
  only mentioned alongside that explicit teardown requirement. Added
  precedence in al-testing-review.md so the deliberate end-of-test
  asserterror Error(...) rollback sentinel isn't also flagged by the
  generic asserterror-needs-expectederror-and-code rule. Rewrote both
  fixtures to actually demonstrate the pattern: persisted fixture data
  (an Item record) instead of an empty comment, a second [Test] method
  that depends on the fixture surviving into it, and an explicit
  Subtype = TestRunner / TestIsolation = Codeunit runner codeunit.

- table-relation-test-exclude-known-invalid-relations-via-event:
  the length/type rule was stated as one global requirement. Verified
  ValidateFieldRelation in codeunit 134926 directly (BCApps reference
  clone) and split it into the two branches the source actually has:
  a field with any unconditional relation needs exact length and exact
  resolved type; a field whose relations are all conditional only fails
  on being shorter (longer is fine) than the largest related field, and
  when the required type is specifically Code, a Text source passes too
  - a tolerance that does not apply on the unconditional side and does
  not extend to a required Text.

Rebased onto upstream/main (one conflict in
transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions.md - upstream had
already linked its sample references via the READ convention, ours
added a Source section; merged both). Also converted the 3 remaining
plain-backtick sample references in this PR to the READ-convention
markdown-link form, same fix as #156/#157/#158.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Dieringer 2026-09-21 22:49:39 +02:00
parent 1392521a8e
commit 69b09db3a6
6 changed files with 100 additions and 16 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
microsoft/knowledge/testing/use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.md
View file

@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ application-area: [all]
When the code under test returns a `Boolean` rather than raising an error, assert the value directly with `Assert.IsFalse(SomeFunc(), Msg)` (or `Assert.IsTrue` for the positive case). Reserve `asserterror` for statements expected to actually raise an error.
See sample: `use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.good.al`.
See sample: [`use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.good.al`](use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.good.al).
## Anti Pattern
`asserterror Assert.IsTrue(SomeFunc(), Msg);` to verify `SomeFunc()` is `false`. It passes today because `Assert.IsTrue` happens to raise an error on failure, but it verifies the assertion helper's error-raising behavior, not the value under test.
See sample: `use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.bad.al`.
See sample: [`use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.bad.al`](use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checks.bad.al).
## Source