mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-06 17:36:53 +01:00
Seed community performance and security knowledge
Ports 14 concern-sized articles (8 performance, 6 security) and 25
AL samples from BC Code Intelligence, restructured to BCQuality's v1
schema and layered under /community/knowledge/. Each article is
atomic, under 100 lines, and ships <slug>.good.al and (where the
pattern has a clear anti-example) <slug>.bad.al siblings.
Jesper's microsoft-layer leaves (al-performance-review and
al-security-review) source across every enabled layer via
*/knowledge/<domain>/**, so these additions are picked up by the
existing action skills without any new skill definitions.
Performance (8):
- use-deleteall-for-filtered-bulk-deletion
- call-setloadfields-before-filters
- load-common-fields-before-branching-on-case
- load-only-primary-key-fields-for-reference-work
- omit-filter-only-fields-from-setloadfields
- choose-maintainsiftindex-by-read-write-ratio
- avoid-growing-globals-in-singleinstance-subscribers
- order-case-branches-by-frequency
Security (6):
- classify-every-field-with-dataclassification
- protect-sensitive-data-in-temporary-tables
- guard-bulk-operations-with-istemporary
- compose-permission-sets-with-included-sets
- do-not-grant-rights-beyond-a-users-entitlement
- prefer-oauth2-over-api-keys-for-external-http-calls
Graveyard-bound items (not ported; to be captured in a later
/docs/triage-graveyard.md):
- testfield-performance (soft guidance, low actionability)
- table-event-batch-operation-impact (keep-event-subscribers-lightweight
already carries the core insight)
- Most of /roger-reviewer (AL formatting - frontier-model territory)
- sift-technology-fundamentals (descriptive, not a citable concern)
- bc-telemetry-buddy-* (tooling promotion, not guidance)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd75d04686
commit
47a189e61c
39 changed files with 1002 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||
table 50100 "Customer Feedback"
|
||||
{
|
||||
fields
|
||||
{
|
||||
field(1; "Feedback No."; Code[20])
|
||||
{
|
||||
DataClassification = SystemMetadata;
|
||||
}
|
||||
field(2; "Contact Name"; Text[100])
|
||||
{
|
||||
DataClassification = EndUserIdentifiableInformation;
|
||||
}
|
||||
field(3; "Email"; Text[80])
|
||||
{
|
||||
DataClassification = EndUserIdentifiableInformation;
|
||||
}
|
||||
field(4; "Product Code"; Code[20])
|
||||
{
|
||||
DataClassification = CustomerContent;
|
||||
}
|
||||
field(5; "Feedback Text"; Text[2048])
|
||||
{
|
||||
// When uncertain between CustomerContent and EUII, prefer the stronger protection.
|
||||
DataClassification = EndUserIdentifiableInformation;
|
||||
}
|
||||
field(6; "Submitted DateTime"; DateTime)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DataClassification = SystemMetadata;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
keys
|
||||
{
|
||||
key(PK; "Feedback No.") { Clustered = true; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue