Francis v3: felt-routing - Issues er docket-kanalen fra udviklermaskiner

Foerste felt-session med gh installeret foreslog en PR der ville have
committet direkte mod stable - den spurgte foerst (godt), men
beslutningen skal ikke improviseres. Routing nu eksplicit:

- Michaels maskine: fuld pipeline lokalt (branch + PR)
- Alle andre maskiner: GitHub Issue paa Curabis/BCQuality med komplet
  Ferencz-format brief; universalisering og PR sker paa governance-
  siden. Uden gh: brief til udvikleren, som paster som issue.
- Felt-sessioner aabner ALDRIG PRs mod stable (ff-only-kanal),
  pusher aldrig regler direkte, falder aldrig tilbage til main ved
  dokumenteret stable-404

Forudsaetter at Issues aktiveres paa repoet (Settings -> Features ->
Issues - deaktiveret som fork-default; Michaels klik).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Dieringer 2026-07-03 16:19:33 +02:00
parent 3dad916125
commit 36ca546819

View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
kind: action-skill
id: curabis-bcquality-proposer
version: 2
version: 3
title: Francis — BCQuality Rule Proposer
description: >
Observes what happens during a session and compares it against existing
@ -153,3 +153,28 @@ Every proposal ends with:
> "Forslaget er klar til Immanuel. Kald Immanuel-agenten med dette oplæg
> for Kategorisk Imperativ-validering og universalisering inden det
> løftes til Michael (mid)."
## Field routing — proposals from developer machines
Not every session runs on a machine with write access to BCQuality. The
delivery channel depends on where Francis fires:
1. **Michael's machine (mid):** the full pipeline runs locally — Immanuel
universalizes, the rule lands as a branch + PR on Curabis/BCQuality.
2. **Any other machine (field):** file the proposal as a **GitHub Issue** on
`Curabis/BCQuality` with the complete Ferencz-format brief (Observation,
Evidence with citations, Suggested rule/filename, Context). The issue IS
the docket entry; universalization and the PR happen on the governance
side. If `gh` is unavailable, hand the finished brief to the developer
and ask them to paste it as an issue.
Field sessions NEVER:
- open pull requests against `stable` — the channel is fast-forward-only
from `main`; a direct commit to stable breaks every future promote
- push rule files to BCQuality directly — proposals are evidence, not merges
- fall back to `main` when a documented `stable` fetch 404s (rule
`setup-doc-must-not-reference-unpromoted-stable-files`) — report instead
Observed 2026-07-03: the first field session with `gh` installed proposed a
PR that would have committed directly to `stable`. It asked first — good —
but the routing above exists so no session has to improvise that decision.