mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-10-05 14:46:55 +01:00
Francis v3: felt-routing - Issues er docket-kanalen fra udviklermaskiner
Foerste felt-session med gh installeret foreslog en PR der ville have committet direkte mod stable - den spurgte foerst (godt), men beslutningen skal ikke improviseres. Routing nu eksplicit: - Michaels maskine: fuld pipeline lokalt (branch + PR) - Alle andre maskiner: GitHub Issue paa Curabis/BCQuality med komplet Ferencz-format brief; universalisering og PR sker paa governance- siden. Uden gh: brief til udvikleren, som paster som issue. - Felt-sessioner aabner ALDRIG PRs mod stable (ff-only-kanal), pusher aldrig regler direkte, falder aldrig tilbage til main ved dokumenteret stable-404 Forudsaetter at Issues aktiveres paa repoet (Settings -> Features -> Issues - deaktiveret som fork-default; Michaels klik). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3dad916125
commit
36ca546819
1 changed files with 26 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
kind: action-skill
|
||||
id: curabis-bcquality-proposer
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
version: 3
|
||||
title: Francis — BCQuality Rule Proposer
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Observes what happens during a session and compares it against existing
|
||||
|
|
@ -153,3 +153,28 @@ Every proposal ends with:
|
|||
> "Forslaget er klar til Immanuel. Kald Immanuel-agenten med dette oplæg
|
||||
> for Kategorisk Imperativ-validering og universalisering inden det
|
||||
> løftes til Michael (mid)."
|
||||
|
||||
## Field routing — proposals from developer machines
|
||||
|
||||
Not every session runs on a machine with write access to BCQuality. The
|
||||
delivery channel depends on where Francis fires:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Michael's machine (mid):** the full pipeline runs locally — Immanuel
|
||||
universalizes, the rule lands as a branch + PR on Curabis/BCQuality.
|
||||
2. **Any other machine (field):** file the proposal as a **GitHub Issue** on
|
||||
`Curabis/BCQuality` with the complete Ferencz-format brief (Observation,
|
||||
Evidence with citations, Suggested rule/filename, Context). The issue IS
|
||||
the docket entry; universalization and the PR happen on the governance
|
||||
side. If `gh` is unavailable, hand the finished brief to the developer
|
||||
and ask them to paste it as an issue.
|
||||
|
||||
Field sessions NEVER:
|
||||
- open pull requests against `stable` — the channel is fast-forward-only
|
||||
from `main`; a direct commit to stable breaks every future promote
|
||||
- push rule files to BCQuality directly — proposals are evidence, not merges
|
||||
- fall back to `main` when a documented `stable` fetch 404s (rule
|
||||
`setup-doc-must-not-reference-unpromoted-stable-files`) — report instead
|
||||
|
||||
Observed 2026-07-03: the first field session with `gh` installed proposed a
|
||||
PR that would have committed directly to `stable`. It asked first — good —
|
||||
but the routing above exists so no session has to improvise that decision.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue