mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git
synced 2026-08-07 18:06:53 +01:00
Add BCApps citations to Tier 1+2 knowledge files; add 2 new rules
- All 7 existing Tier 1/2 knowledge files now include a BCApps Reference section with concrete source links and observed patterns - New: bcpt-scenarios-must-be-app-specific — PerformanceTest apps must include app-domain BCPT scenarios, not only Microsoft generic samples - New: permission-sets-must-follow-least-privilege — View/Edit/Admin hierarchy with IncludedPermissionSets, mirroring BCApps BusFound pattern - api-page-key-fields-must-be-editable-on-insert clarified: SystemId as ODataKeyField + Editable=false is valid (auto-generated); rule applies to consumer-provided key fields only Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e11c1fd16c
commit
288f64df16
9 changed files with 365 additions and 355 deletions
|
|
@ -1,88 +1,38 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
bc-version: [all]
|
||||
domain: testing
|
||||
keywords: [test, hardcode, random, library, no-series, setup, data]
|
||||
technologies: [al]
|
||||
countries: [w1]
|
||||
application-area: [all]
|
||||
---
|
||||
# CURABIS Test Data Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
## Core Principle
|
||||
|
||||
CURABIS tests assume an empty database. All test data must be created
|
||||
programmatically — never assume existing records or hardcode codes, numbers,
|
||||
or names that may or may not exist in a given environment.
|
||||
"CURABIS tests assume an empty database. All test data must be created programmatically — never assume existing records or hardcode codes, numbers, or names that may or may not exist in a given environment."
|
||||
|
||||
Three concrete rules:
|
||||
## Three Mandatory Rules
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Use MS Library codeunits for standard BC objects.**
|
||||
No-series, G/L accounts, customers, vendors, items, locations, posting groups —
|
||||
all created via `Library - ERM`, `Library - Inventory`, `Library - Sales` etc.
|
||||
These tools generate random codes that do not collide across test runs.
|
||||
**Rule 1: Leverage Microsoft Libraries**
|
||||
Use built-in setup codeunits (`Library - ERM`, `Library - Inventory`, `Library - Sales`) for standard Business Central objects like no-series, G/L accounts, customers, and items. These generate collision-free random codes.
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Fill all required fields with random values.**
|
||||
A `Code[10]` field gets 10 random characters. A `Text[50]` field gets random text.
|
||||
Use `Library - Utility` or `Any` codeunit for random generation.
|
||||
Partial setup that leaves required fields empty is not acceptable.
|
||||
**Rule 2: Complete All Required Fields**
|
||||
Every mandatory field must receive a value. A `Code[10]` field requires 10 random characters; `Text[50]` needs randomized text. Partial setups violating this principle are prohibited.
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Build your own tools for custom tables.**
|
||||
For CURABIS-specific tables (e.g. `Settlement Payment Method`,
|
||||
`Settlement Voucher Setup`), maintain dedicated setup procedures in the
|
||||
Test Library codeunit. These procedures must follow the same pattern as
|
||||
Microsoft's libraries: create records programmatically, use random values
|
||||
for codes where no fixed value is required by the flow being tested.
|
||||
**Rule 3: Create Custom Procedures for Domain-Specific Tables**
|
||||
For CURABIS-exclusive tables, build dedicated setup functions in Test Library following Microsoft's patterns: programmatic creation with random values unless the test documents a fixed contract requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
**Exception — integration and flow tests.**
|
||||
When a test validates a specific integration contract (e.g. a fixed JSON
|
||||
structure from a web service, a specific EDIFACT message, a fixed counterparty
|
||||
code expected by an external system), hardcoded values are acceptable and
|
||||
necessary. The test is documenting the contract, not exercising random data.
|
||||
## Critical Exception
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti Pattern
|
||||
Integration and flow tests validating external contracts (JSON structures, EDIFACT messages, counterparty codes) may use hardcoded values. These tests document the integration specification itself, not arbitrary test logic.
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// WRONG: hardcoded code that may or may not exist
|
||||
if not PaymentMethod.Get('CASH') then begin
|
||||
PaymentMethod.Code := 'CASH';
|
||||
...
|
||||
end;
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// WRONG: hardcoded source code
|
||||
SourceCode.Code := 'SV-POST';
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Conditional hardcoded lookups assuming pre-existing data
|
||||
- Shortened field values not matching declared field length
|
||||
- Underfilled required fields
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// WRONG: partial setup — Code[10] left short
|
||||
PaymentMethod.Code := 'C'; // not filled to capacity
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Implementation Example
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practice
|
||||
Generate randomized payment method codes via `LibraryUtility.GenerateRandomCode()` rather than assuming 'CASH' exists. Create source codes through `LibraryERM.CreateSourceCode()` and retrieve no-series using `LibraryUtility.GetGlobalNoSeriesCode()`.
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// CORRECT: random code via LibraryUtility
|
||||
PaymentMethod.Code :=
|
||||
CopyStr(LibraryUtility.GenerateRandomCode(
|
||||
PaymentMethod.FieldNo(Code), DATABASE::"Settlement Payment Method"), 1, 10);
|
||||
PaymentMethod.Description := LibraryUtility.GenerateRandomText(50);
|
||||
PaymentMethod.Insert();
|
||||
```
|
||||
## BCApps Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// CORRECT: source code created via standard MS pattern
|
||||
LibraryERM.CreateSourceCode(SourceCode);
|
||||
GlobalSourceCode := SourceCode.Code;
|
||||
// then assign to Source Code Setup
|
||||
```
|
||||
The randomization helpers central to this rule — `LibraryUtility.GenerateRandomCode()`, `LibraryERM.CreateSourceCode()`, `LibraryUtility.GetGlobalNoSeriesCode()` — are implemented and maintained in BCApps. BCApps test code never hardcodes record identifiers like `'CASH'`, `'10000'`, or `'70000'`; all test data is generated programmatically.
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// CORRECT: no-series via MS library
|
||||
GlobalNoSeriesCode := LibraryUtility.GetGlobalNoSeriesCode();
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```al
|
||||
// CORRECT: hardcoded in integration test — documenting a contract
|
||||
// [SCENARIO] Inbound ORDRSP with fixed order reference from Allnet Germany
|
||||
ExpectedOrderRef := 'ORD-2026-00001'; // fixed by integration contract
|
||||
```
|
||||
- **Source:** https://github.com/microsoft/BCApps/tree/main/src/Tools/Test%20Framework
|
||||
- **Pattern:** BCApps test codeunits create every required record from scratch using library helpers that guarantee uniqueness per test run. The CURABIS rule mirrors this approach exactly.
|
||||
- **Note:** The `BCPTCreateSOWithNLines.Codeunit.al` sample in BCApps uses `Customer.get('10000')` as a fallback — this is a BCPT performance scenario (not a correctness test) and explicitly acknowledges this deviation. Correctness tests must never do this.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue