Merge branch 'microsoft:main' into agent

community/knowledge/data-modeling/transferfields-skip-type-mismatch-can-drop-data.bad.al

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+table 50123 "Transfer Source Bad"
+{
+    fields
+    {
+        field(1; "Entry No."; Integer)
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+        field(2; "Reference"; Code[20])
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+    }
+
+    keys
+    {
+        key(PK; "Entry No.")
+        {
+            Clustered = true;
+        }
+    }
+
+}
+
+table 50124 "Transfer Target Bad"
+{
+    fields
+    {
+        field(1; "Entry No."; Integer)
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+        field(2; "Reference"; Integer)
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+    }
+
+    keys
+    {
+        key(PK; "Entry No.")
+        {
+            Clustered = true;
+        }
+    }
+
+}
+
+codeunit 50492 "TransferFields Bad"
+{
+    procedure CopyData(Source: Record "Transfer Source Bad"; var Target: Record "Transfer Target Bad")
+    begin
+        Target.TransferFields(Source, true, true);
+    end;
+}

community/knowledge/data-modeling/transferfields-skip-type-mismatch-can-drop-data.good.al

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+table 50121 "Transfer Source"
+{
+    fields
+    {
+        field(1; "Entry No."; Integer)
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+        field(2; "Reference"; Code[20])
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+    }
+
+    keys
+    {
+        key(PK; "Entry No.")
+        {
+            Clustered = true;
+        }
+    }
+
+}
+
+table 50122 "Transfer Target"
+{
+    fields
+    {
+        field(1; "Entry No."; Integer)
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+        field(2; "Reference"; Integer)
+        {
+            DataClassification = CustomerContent;
+        }
+    }
+
+    keys
+    {
+        key(PK; "Entry No.")
+        {
+            Clustered = true;
+        }
+    }
+
+}
+
+codeunit 50491 "TransferFields Good"
+{
+    procedure CopyData(Source: Record "Transfer Source"; var Target: Record "Transfer Target")
+    var
+        ConvertedReference: Integer;
+    begin
+        Target."Entry No." := Source."Entry No.";
+        Evaluate(ConvertedReference, Source."Reference");
+        Target.Validate("Reference", ConvertedReference);
+    end;
+}

community/knowledge/data-modeling/transferfields-skip-type-mismatch-can-drop-data.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+bc-version: [16..]
+domain: data-modeling
+keywords: [transferfields, skipfieldsnotmatchingtype, type-mismatch, field-mapping, data-transfer]
+technologies: [al]
+countries: [w1]
+application-area: [all]
+---
+
+# Do not use SkipFieldsNotMatchingType to hide required TransferFields mismatches
+
+## Description
+
+`Record.TransferFields` copies values between fields with matching field numbers. Without `SkipFieldsNotMatchingType` (or with it `false`), a type mismatch between two fields in the same extension raises a runtime error at the point of transfer. Setting `SkipFieldsNotMatchingType` to `true` removes that error: the field is skipped instead, and the rest of the transfer completes normally. The caller gets no indication that a field was not copied.
+
+## Best Practice
+
+Use `TransferFields(Source)` only when every field the destination requires, including primary key fields, is guaranteed to share a matching field number and type with the source; this form defaults `InitPrimaryKeyFields` to `true`. Fields with no matching field number, and fields whose types differ across extensions, are skipped regardless of `SkipFieldsNotMatchingType` — that parameter only governs same-extension type mismatches. If the destination depends on a field that falls into either case, map and validate it explicitly in code rather than relying on `TransferFields` to catch the gap. Use `SkipFieldsNotMatchingType = true` only when skipping same-extension type mismatches is an intentional, documented part of the transfer contract.
+
+See sample: `transferfields-skip-type-mismatch-can-drop-data.good.al`.
+
+## Anti Pattern
+
+Using `TransferFields(Source, InitPrimaryKeyFields, true)` as a generic way to make two evolving table schemas transfer without errors, when the destination depends on every required source field being copied. A type change on either table can turn a previously transferred field into a silently skipped one without making the transfer itself fail.
+
+See sample: `transferfields-skip-type-mismatch-can-drop-data.bad.al`.

microsoft/knowledge/performance/apply-filters-before-iterating.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ A `SetRange` or `SetFilter` placed before `FindSet` narrows the result set at th
 
 ## Best Practice
 
-Move every predicate that can be expressed as an equality or range filter into a `SetRange` or `SetFilter` ahead of the find. Combine with `SetCurrentKey` to choose a key whose first fields match the filter (see `setcurrentkey-aligns-key-with-filters.md`). The loop body should then contain only the work that depends on per-row state.
+Move every predicate that can be expressed as an equality or range filter into a `SetRange` or `SetFilter` ahead of the find. Make sure a key (index) exists whose leading fields cover the filter so the optimizer can seek; note that `SetCurrentKey` only sets sort order and is not an index hint (see `setcurrentkey-sets-sort-order-not-index-hint.md`). The loop body should then contain only the work that depends on per-row state.
 
 See sample: `apply-filters-before-iterating.good.al`.
 

microsoft/knowledge/performance/setcurrentkey-aligns-key-with-filters.good.al

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-codeunit 50230 "Perf Sample SetCurrentKey Good"
-{
-    procedure ProcessLines(var SalesHeader: Record "Sales Header")
-    var
-        SalesLine: Record "Sales Line";
-    begin
-        SalesLine.SetCurrentKey("Document Type", "Document No.", "Line No.");
-        SalesLine.SetRange("Document Type", SalesHeader."Document Type");
-        SalesLine.SetRange("Document No.", SalesHeader."No.");
-        if SalesLine.FindSet() then
-            repeat
-                // ...
-            until SalesLine.Next() = 0;
-    end;
-}

microsoft/knowledge/performance/setcurrentkey-aligns-key-with-filters.md

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
----
-bc-version: [all]
-domain: performance
-keywords: [setcurrentkey, key, index, filter, sort]
-technologies: [al]
-countries: [w1]
-application-area: [all]
----
-
-# Pick a key whose fields cover the filter and sort with SetCurrentKey
-
-## Description
-
-The platform chooses a key for each record access. When the filters or required sort do not match the primary key — or any non-explicit choice — the query may run against a key that does not cover the filter columns. Per the upstream guidance, "Use `SetCurrentKey()` to select the most efficient key for your filters" and "match key fields to your filter/sort requirements." Filtering on fields that are not in any key is flagged as bad — there is no index to ride and the access ends up reading more than necessary.
-
-## Best Practice
-
-When the access pattern is anything other than primary-key lookup, look at the filters and the desired sort, then either pick an existing key whose leading fields cover them and call `SetCurrentKey(...)`, or declare a new key on the table for the pattern. Match leading fields first — a key starting with `"Document Type", "Document No.", "Line No."` serves a filter on those three; a key starting with `"Line No."` does not.
-
-See sample: `setcurrentkey-aligns-key-with-filters.good.al`.
-
-## Anti Pattern
-
-Applying filters on fields that no key indexes, leaving the platform to read more than it should. The query produces the right answer; the cost surfaces only at production volume. The mirror case is forgetting `SetCurrentKey` when the wanted sort differs from the primary key — the iteration may then be sorted in memory after a wider read than necessary.

microsoft/knowledge/performance/setcurrentkey-sets-sort-order-not-index-hint.bad.al

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+codeunit 50231 "Perf Sample SetCurrentKey Bad"
+{
+    // Misconception: SetCurrentKey does NOT tell SQL Server to use this index.
+    // The optimizer picks the index from the filters (WHERE clause) and statistics.
+    // The result order is never used here, so SetCurrentKey only adds an ORDER BY
+    // the query does not need — and can push the plan toward a sort.
+    procedure SumRemainingAmount(CustomerNo: Code[20]) Total: Decimal
+    var
+        CustLedgerEntry: Record "Cust. Ledger Entry";
+    begin
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetCurrentKey("Customer No.", Open, "Posting Date");
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetRange("Customer No.", CustomerNo);
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetRange(Open, true);
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetAutoCalcFields("Remaining Amount");
+        if CustLedgerEntry.FindSet() then
+            repeat
+                Total += CustLedgerEntry."Remaining Amount";
+            until CustLedgerEntry.Next() = 0;
+    end;
+}

microsoft/knowledge/performance/setcurrentkey-sets-sort-order-not-index-hint.good.al

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+codeunit 50230 "Perf Sample SetCurrentKey Good"
+{
+    // SetCurrentKey is used because the rows must be processed oldest-first.
+    // The sort is a functional requirement, so the ORDER BY it adds is justified.
+    procedure ApplyOldestEntriesFirst(CustomerNo: Code[20])
+    var
+        CustLedgerEntry: Record "Cust. Ledger Entry";
+    begin
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetRange("Customer No.", CustomerNo);
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetRange(Open, true);
+        CustLedgerEntry.SetCurrentKey("Posting Date");
+        if CustLedgerEntry.FindSet() then
+            repeat
+                // Apply entries in posting-date order ...
+            until CustLedgerEntry.Next() = 0;
+    end;
+}
+

microsoft/knowledge/performance/setcurrentkey-sets-sort-order-not-index-hint.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+bc-version: [all]
+domain: performance
+keywords: [setcurrentkey, sort, order-by, index, key, query-optimizer, hint]
+technologies: [al]
+countries: [w1]
+application-area: [all]
+---
+
+# SetCurrentKey only sets sort order — it is not an index hint
+
+## Description
+
+A common misconception is that `SetCurrentKey` tells SQL Server which index to use for a query. It does not. In Business Central, `SetCurrentKey` only changes the `ORDER BY` clause of the generated SQL statement. It does not add an index hint, and the SQL Server query optimizer is free to ignore the named key entirely.
+
+The optimizer picks the index from the `WHERE` clause (your `SetRange`/`SetFilter`) together with table statistics and estimated cost. In practice it almost never chooses an index just because that key appears in `ORDER BY`. So calling `SetCurrentKey` to "steer" the plan toward an index is a no-op for index selection — and can make things worse: an `ORDER BY` that the query does not otherwise need can push the optimizer toward a less selective index or add a Sort operator to the plan.
+
+Selectivity comes from having the right index available (a key on the table whose leading fields cover the filter) and from filtering on those fields — not from `SetCurrentKey`.
+
+## Best Practice
+
+Decide `SetCurrentKey` on one question only: **do I need the result set in a specific order?**
+
+- If yes — you iterate rows in a defined sequence, or rely on `FindFirst`/`FindLast`/`Next` returning a particular row — call `SetCurrentKey` for that sort. The order is a functional requirement, and the `ORDER BY` is justified.
+- If no — omit `SetCurrentKey`. Let the optimizer choose the cheapest plan for your filters; it may pick a better index and skip a sort.
+
+To make a filtered read fast, ensure a key (index) exists on the table whose leading fields cover the filter, and filter on those fields with `SetRange`/`SetFilter`. That is what lets the optimizer seek. Defining the key creates the index; `SetCurrentKey` is not required to make the optimizer use it.
+
+See sample: `setcurrentkey-sets-sort-order-not-index-hint.good.al`.
+
+## Anti Pattern
+
+Adding `SetCurrentKey` to a filtered read purely in the belief that it forces SQL Server to seek a particular index, when the code never uses the resulting order. This does nothing for index selection and only appends an `ORDER BY` the query does not need, risking an unnecessary sort. Remove the `SetCurrentKey`; rely on the filters and an existing covering key instead.
+
+See sample: `setcurrentkey-sets-sort-order-not-index-hint.bad.al`.