Narrow AL development to read-only plan guidance

Retain shared knowledge enrichment and review guidance; defer standalone implementation and source-ingestion tracking. Add runner-owned baseline evidence, contract regressions, and explicit consumer/pilot boundaries.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

evaluation/development-guidance-fixtures.json

@@ -5,36 +5,18 @@
   "minimumKnowledgePrecision": 0.67,
   "cases": [
     {
-      "id": "bcapps-filtered-batch-bug-plan",
-      "title": "Select guidance from a BCFIX-HANDOFF v1 payload",
+      "id": "synthetic-normal-initial-plan",
+      "title": "Anonymized normal initial-plan consumer boundary",
+      "evidenceType": "integration-shaped-synthetic",
+      "boundary": "A synthetic consumer produces metadata plus a markdown plan body, serializes the full document, and passes that document as the generic existing development-plan. This is not an external real pilot and contains no consumer workflow-state schema.",
       "expectedKind": "bug",
-      "development-plan": {
-        "format": "BCFIX-HANDOFF",
-        "version": 1,
-        "issue": 4312,
-        "phase": "implement",
-        "status": "paused",
-        "baton": 2,
-        "rootCause": "The routine calls FindFirst and updates the current record without entering an enumerator loop, so only the first record in the supplied filtered set is modified.",
-        "harnessMap": {
-          "testCodeunit": "Update Selected Entries Tests",
-          "libraries": [
-            "Library - Random"
-          ],
-          "pages": [],
-          "handlers": []
-        },
-        "iterationsUsed": 1,
-        "filesCommitted": [
-          "test/Batch/UpdateSelectedEntries.Codeunit.al"
-        ],
-        "lastTestResult": "1 failing, 4 passing; the red test shows only the first of three selected records is updated.",
-        "deadEnds": [
-          "Changing the page selection did not help because the codeunit discarded the supplied enumerator."
-        ],
-        "nextStep": "Replace the single-record read with an update-safe FindSet/Next loop that preserves the supplied filters, then rerun the red test."
-      },
+      "expectedOutcome": "completed",
+      "expectedUnknown": [],
+      "requiresUnresolved": false,
+      "requiresMaterialUnresolved": false,
+      "development-plan": "{\"metadata\":{\"kind\":\"bug\",\"request\":\"Update every entry in the supplied filtered record set while preserving the caller's selection.\",\"origin\":\"anonymized synthetic initial plan\"},\"body\":\"## Root cause and design\\nThe routine reads and updates only the first record rather than iterating the supplied filtered set. Preserve the supplied filters and update each selected row.\\n\\n## Proposed fix\\nUse an update-safe FindSet/Next loop with an explicit update on each selected entry.\\n\\n## Affected files\\n- src/Batch/UpdateSelectedEntries.Codeunit.al\\n- test/Batch/UpdateSelectedEntriesTests.Codeunit.al\\n\\n## Test strategy\\nUse existing AL test library codeunits to arrange three selected rows and an excluded row. Assert all selected rows are updated and the excluded row is unchanged. This is a proposed test, not a reported result.\\n\\n## Acceptance criteria\\n- Every selected entry is updated exactly once.\\n- The supplied filters remain effective.\\n- No excluded entry changes.\\n- Empty selections cause no changes.\\n\"}",
       "context": {
+        "bc-version": "28",
         "technologies": [
           "al"
         ],
@@ -43,7 +25,8 @@
         ],
         "application-area": [
           "all"
-        ]
+        ],
+        "unknown": []
       },
       "requiredKnowledge": [
         "microsoft/knowledge/performance/pair-findset-with-next-loop.md",
@@ -58,6 +41,10 @@
       "id": "versioned-upgrade-plan-guidance",
       "title": "Select guidance for a versioned data upgrade",
       "expectedKind": "upgrade",
+      "expectedOutcome": "completed",
+      "expectedUnknown": [],
+      "requiresUnresolved": false,
+      "requiresMaterialUnresolved": false,
       "development-plan": {
         "kind": "upgrade",
         "request": "Migrate existing customer tier text values to a new enum field in an app upgrade.",
@@ -78,6 +65,7 @@
         ]
       },
       "context": {
+        "bc-version": "28",
         "technologies": [
           "al"
         ],
@@ -86,7 +74,8 @@
         ],
         "application-area": [
           "all"
-        ]
+        ],
+        "unknown": []
       },
       "requiredKnowledge": [
         "microsoft/knowledge/upgrade/use-upgrade-tags-not-version-checks.md",
@@ -97,6 +86,90 @@
         "microsoft/knowledge/upgrade/datatransfer-skips-triggers-and-subscribers.md",
         "microsoft/knowledge/upgrade/appversion-meaning-depends-on-execution-context.md"
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "no-additional-knowledge",
+      "title": "Honest empty enrichment does not prohibit ordinary work",
+      "expectedKind": "maintenance",
+      "expectedOutcome": "no-knowledge",
+      "expectedUnknown": [],
+      "requiresUnresolved": false,
+      "requiresMaterialUnresolved": false,
+      "development-plan": {
+        "kind": "maintenance",
+        "request": "Correct a spelling error in an existing internal explanatory comment in an AL procedure. Do not change the explanation, executable code, UI captions, schema, diagnostic text, configuration or behavior.",
+        "affected-files": ["src/Batch/EntryProcessor.Codeunit.al"],
+        "proposed-changes": ["Replace the misspelled word in the existing comment; add no new advice."],
+        "test-strategy": "Inspect the diff to confirm that only the comment spelling changes.",
+        "acceptance-criteria": ["Only the intended comment spelling changes; executable AL remains identical."]
+      },
+      "context": {
+        "bc-version": "28",
+        "technologies": ["al"],
+        "countries": ["w1"],
+        "application-area": ["all"],
+        "unknown": []
+      },
+      "requiredKnowledge": [],
+      "optionalKnowledge": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "unknown-material-version",
+      "title": "Materially unresolved version-sensitive guidance stays partial",
+      "expectedKind": "feature",
+      "expectedOutcome": "partial",
+      "expectedUnknown": ["bc-version"],
+      "requiresUnresolved": true,
+      "requiresMaterialUnresolved": true,
+      "development-plan": {
+        "kind": "feature",
+        "request": "Add an expensive Sum FlowField as the source of a usually-hidden page control. The proposed design relies on visibility suppressing calculation.",
+        "affected-files": ["src/Pages/EntryOverview.Page.al"],
+        "proposed-changes": ["Bind the page control directly to the FlowField and set Visible to a conditional expression."],
+        "test-strategy": "Verify aggregate queries are not executed while the control is hidden.",
+        "acceptance-criteria": ["Hidden controls do not cause expensive aggregate queries."],
+        "unknown": ["The deployment BC version and visible-only calculation feature state cannot be established from this fixture. Do not invent either."]
+      },
+      "context": {
+        "bc-version": "unknown",
+        "technologies": ["al"],
+        "countries": ["w1"],
+        "application-area": ["all"],
+        "unknown": ["bc-version"]
+      },
+      "requiredKnowledge": [
+        "microsoft/knowledge/performance/hidden-flowfields-still-calculate-before-bc26-opt-in.md"
+      ],
+      "optionalKnowledge": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "partial-plan-decision",
+      "title": "Known platform context does not resolve an incomplete plan decision",
+      "expectedKind": "refactor",
+      "expectedOutcome": "partial",
+      "expectedUnknown": [],
+      "requiresUnresolved": true,
+      "requiresMaterialUnresolved": true,
+      "development-plan": {
+        "kind": "refactor",
+        "request": "Refactor a record read helper currently using FindFirst followed by Next. The caller contract does not establish whether to return one row or enumerate the entire filtered set.",
+        "affected-files": ["src/Queries/EntryReader.Codeunit.al"],
+        "proposed-changes": ["Choose the read method consistent with the intended cardinality after that decision is clarified."],
+        "test-strategy": "Add cardinality assertions after the caller contract is decided.",
+        "acceptance-criteria": ["The method and enumeration agree with the clarified caller contract."],
+        "unknown": ["Single-record versus multi-record caller intent remains materially unresolved."]
+      },
+      "context": {
+        "bc-version": "28",
+        "technologies": ["al"],
+        "countries": ["w1"],
+        "application-area": ["all"],
+        "unknown": []
+      },
+      "requiredKnowledge": [
+        "microsoft/knowledge/performance/pair-findset-with-next-loop.md"
+      ],
+      "optionalKnowledge": []
     }
   ]
 }