Complete AL review knowledge readiness (#108)
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled

* Complete AL review knowledge readiness

Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Generalize review fixture discovery

Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Preserve published field IDs in sample

Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Clarify published field identity rules

State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Align field obsoletion sample baselines

Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 2026-07-15 10:55:25 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent ae04938c03
commit 186d8a1314
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
105 changed files with 2229 additions and 212 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
---
bc-version: [18..]
domain: telemetry
keywords: [featuretelemetry, loguptake, discovered, set-up, used, uptake-status, lifecycle]
technologies: [al]
countries: [w1]
application-area: [all]
---
# Emit FeatureTelemetry uptake states in lifecycle order
## Description
`FeatureTelemetry.LogUptake` accepts `Discovered`, `Set up`, `Used`, and `Undiscovered`, but the platform records the forward transition only as `Discovered` to `Set up` to `Used`. If the first call for a feature is `Set up` or `Used`, no uptake telemetry is emitted. `Undiscovered` is the explicit reset from any state.
## Best Practice
Log `Discovered` when the user encounters the feature, `Set up` after its setup is completed, and `Used` when the user attempts it. Keep the same feature name throughout the funnel. Review ordering only when the changed repository context shows the feature's lifecycle; a single isolated `Used` call cannot prove that earlier states are absent elsewhere.
See sample: `feature-uptake-transitions-in-order.good.al`.
## Anti Pattern
Introducing a feature whose only uptake call jumps directly to `Set up` or `Used`, or using different feature-name literals for successive states. The calls compile and run, but the funnel silently omits the invalid transition.
See sample: `feature-uptake-transitions-in-order.bad.al`.