Microsoft/bcquality
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/BCQuality.git synced 2026-08-06 09:26:52 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete AL review knowledge readiness (#108)
Some checks failed
Validate knowledge index / validate-index (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Validate AL review fixtures / validate-review-fixtures (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Validate frontmatter and structure / validate (push) Has been cancelled
Details

Browse source 
* Complete AL review knowledge readiness

Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Generalize review fixture discovery

Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Preserve published field IDs in sample

Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Clarify published field identity rules

State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Align field obsoletion sample baselines

Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Schulz-Wedde 2026-07-15 10:55:25 +02:00 • committed by GitHub
parent ae04938c03
commit 186d8a1314
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
105 changed files with 2229 additions and 212 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
microsoft/knowledge/breaking-changes/obsolete-table-fields-instead-of-deleting-them.good.al
View file

@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ table 50310 "Customer Profile Good"
fields
{
field(1; "No."; Code[20]) { }
// Replacement field shipped alongside the old one.
// Replacement is a separate field under an otherwise unused ID.
field(2; "Contact Email"; Text[80]) { }
// Old field kept and marked Pending so dependent code keeps compiling and
// an upgrade codeunit can copy its data before it is finally removed.
// Old field keeps its original ID, name, and type and is marked Pending so
// dependent code keeps compiling while an upgrade codeunit migrates its data.
field(3; "Email"; Text[80])
{
ObsoleteState = Pending;