Complete AL review knowledge readiness (#108)

* Complete AL review knowledge readiness

Fill telemetry and Query coverage, strengthen thin review domains, correct audited content defects, and add deterministic cheap-model evaluation and reference-integrity safeguards.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Generalize review fixture discovery

Derive smoke cases from the leaf, domain, and paired-sample conventions so new leaves require no scoring-contract changes. Keep only exceptional selection/context overrides and fail when retrieval metadata cannot rank the selected article.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Preserve published field IDs in sample

Keep the existing Email and Contact Email field IDs unchanged, clarify that the sample represents an independent baseline, and use a local breaking-change rule for the generic smoke evaluation.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Clarify published field identity rules

State explicitly that a published field keeps its ID, name, and type while a replacement is added as a separate field under an unused ID.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

* Align field obsoletion sample baselines

Use Email field ID 3 as the shared baseline so the bad example demonstrates a same-ID rename while the good example retains the original field and adds a separate replacement.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 9825b012-e653-496a-9310-c1f4b6f8ac27

---------

Co-authored-by: Jesper Schulz-Wedde <jesper.schulzwedde@microsoft.com>

microsoft/knowledge/appsource/permission-sets-cover-setup-and-usage-without-super.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+bc-version: [all]
+domain: appsource
+keywords: [permission-set, super, appsource, setup, usage, tabledata, execute, submission]
+technologies: [al]
+countries: [w1]
+application-area: [all]
+---
+
+# AppSource permission sets must cover setup and usage without SUPER
+
+## Description
+
+An AppSource app must provide permission sets that let assigned users complete the app's setup and normal usage without `SUPER`. The requirement is about complete effective grants, not about naming the permission set after the app. A package can compile and install with missing tabledata or execute permissions, then fail only when Marketplace validation or a real non-SUPER user reaches the omitted path.
+
+## Best Practice
+
+Trace every setup page, normal page, report, codeunit, and tabledata operation exposed by the app and cover it through assignable role permission sets composed from focused non-assignable sets. Validate setup and representative workflows as a user assigned only those app roles. Grant the minimum required operations; completeness is not a reason to use wildcards.
+
+See sample: `permission-sets-cover-setup-and-usage-without-super.good.al`.
+
+## Anti Pattern
+
+Shipping no permission set, omitting a tabledata or execute grant used by the app's own UI, or instructing users and validators to assign `SUPER` when setup fails. Do not flag a permission-set name that differs from the app name; no such naming requirement exists.
+
+See sample: `permission-sets-cover-setup-and-usage-without-super.bad.al`.